心衰自我照护指标中文版的跨文化适应与心理测量评估。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/nur.22441
Yanfei Miao, Qing Zhang, Hongmin Huang, Fei She, Bingjian Wang, Yiping Mao
{"title":"心衰自我照护指标中文版的跨文化适应与心理测量评估。","authors":"Yanfei Miao, Qing Zhang, Hongmin Huang, Fei She, Bingjian Wang, Yiping Mao","doi":"10.1002/nur.22441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To translate and adapt the English version of the Caregiver Contributions to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) to Chinese, and further to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CC-SCHFI in a cohort of caregivers of people with heart failure. CC-SCHFI translation and cross-cultural adaption were performed. 240 caregivers were recruited to complete the instrument. The internal construct reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's α and item-to-total correlations. The concurrent validity was tested by using the CACHS which also measures caregivers' contribution to HF self-care. Psychometric analysis was performed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated 4-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care maintenance scale, 1-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care management scale and 2-factor structure for confidence in contributing to self-care scale. All the subjects successfully completed the interviews in an average of 12.3 ± 3.2 min. The internal consistency reliability analysis of the CC-SCHFI showed Cronbach α of 0.83. All items showed adequate discrimination, with the item-total correlation coefficient of greater than 0.4. The scores of CC-SCHFI scales were significantly correlated with the CACHS scale scores. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.341 to 0.765, indicating acceptable concurrent validity. For CFA, all factor loadings were significant at > 0.30 and generally medium to high. The simplified Chinese version of CC-SCHFI is a psychometrically reliable instrument with empirically supported validity, which can be applied to clinical evaluation of the contribution of caregivers to HF self-care. Compared with CACHS, CC-SCHFI can be more easily completed and simultaneously maintains acceptable concurrent validity. Further studies are warranted to investigate the combined use of these two instruments among other populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese Version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index.\",\"authors\":\"Yanfei Miao, Qing Zhang, Hongmin Huang, Fei She, Bingjian Wang, Yiping Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nur.22441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To translate and adapt the English version of the Caregiver Contributions to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) to Chinese, and further to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CC-SCHFI in a cohort of caregivers of people with heart failure. CC-SCHFI translation and cross-cultural adaption were performed. 240 caregivers were recruited to complete the instrument. The internal construct reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's α and item-to-total correlations. The concurrent validity was tested by using the CACHS which also measures caregivers' contribution to HF self-care. Psychometric analysis was performed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated 4-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care maintenance scale, 1-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care management scale and 2-factor structure for confidence in contributing to self-care scale. All the subjects successfully completed the interviews in an average of 12.3 ± 3.2 min. The internal consistency reliability analysis of the CC-SCHFI showed Cronbach α of 0.83. All items showed adequate discrimination, with the item-total correlation coefficient of greater than 0.4. The scores of CC-SCHFI scales were significantly correlated with the CACHS scale scores. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.341 to 0.765, indicating acceptable concurrent validity. For CFA, all factor loadings were significant at > 0.30 and generally medium to high. The simplified Chinese version of CC-SCHFI is a psychometrically reliable instrument with empirically supported validity, which can be applied to clinical evaluation of the contribution of caregivers to HF self-care. Compared with CACHS, CC-SCHFI can be more easily completed and simultaneously maintains acceptable concurrent validity. Further studies are warranted to investigate the combined use of these two instruments among other populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"203-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:将英文版《心衰护理者自我护理贡献指数》(CC-SCHFI)翻译成中文,并进一步探讨中文版CC-SCHFI在心衰患者护理者队列中的心理测量特性。进行CC-SCHFI翻译和跨文化改编。240名护理人员被招募来完成这项研究。内部结构信度采用Cronbach’s α和项目-总相关进行评估。同时效度采用CACHS量表进行测试,CACHS量表也测量照顾者对HF自我护理的贡献。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)进行心理测量分析。我们评估了照顾者自我照顾维持贡献量表的4因子结构、照顾者自我照顾管理贡献量表的1因子结构和自我照顾贡献量表的2因子结构。所有被试平均在12.3±3.2分钟内完成访谈。CC-SCHFI的内部一致性信度分析显示Cronbach α为0.83。所有项目均表现出充分的辨别力,项目-总相关系数均大于0.4。CC-SCHFI量表得分与CACHS量表得分显著相关。相关系数在0.341 ~ 0.765之间,为可接受的并发效度。对于CFA,所有因子负荷在> - 0.30之间显著,一般为中高负荷。简体中文版CC-SCHFI量表在心理计量学上是可靠的,具有经验支持的效度,可用于临床评价照护者对心衰自我照顾的贡献。与CACHS相比,CC-SCHFI更容易完成,同时保持可接受的并发效度。有必要进一步研究这两种工具在其他人群中的联合使用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Cultural Adaption and Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese Version of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index.

To translate and adapt the English version of the Caregiver Contributions to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) to Chinese, and further to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CC-SCHFI in a cohort of caregivers of people with heart failure. CC-SCHFI translation and cross-cultural adaption were performed. 240 caregivers were recruited to complete the instrument. The internal construct reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's α and item-to-total correlations. The concurrent validity was tested by using the CACHS which also measures caregivers' contribution to HF self-care. Psychometric analysis was performed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated 4-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care maintenance scale, 1-factor structure for caregiver contribution to self-care management scale and 2-factor structure for confidence in contributing to self-care scale. All the subjects successfully completed the interviews in an average of 12.3 ± 3.2 min. The internal consistency reliability analysis of the CC-SCHFI showed Cronbach α of 0.83. All items showed adequate discrimination, with the item-total correlation coefficient of greater than 0.4. The scores of CC-SCHFI scales were significantly correlated with the CACHS scale scores. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.341 to 0.765, indicating acceptable concurrent validity. For CFA, all factor loadings were significant at > 0.30 and generally medium to high. The simplified Chinese version of CC-SCHFI is a psychometrically reliable instrument with empirically supported validity, which can be applied to clinical evaluation of the contribution of caregivers to HF self-care. Compared with CACHS, CC-SCHFI can be more easily completed and simultaneously maintains acceptable concurrent validity. Further studies are warranted to investigate the combined use of these two instruments among other populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信