非糖尿病视网膜病变筛查在联邦合格卫生中心初级保健设置:主动外展与护理点检测的比较。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Adam G Hidad, Paul J Bryar
{"title":"非糖尿病视网膜病变筛查在联邦合格卫生中心初级保健设置:主动外展与护理点检测的比较。","authors":"Adam G Hidad, Paul J Bryar","doi":"10.1353/hpu.2025.a951586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the efficacy of a diabetic eye care coordinator (DECC) conducting non-mydriatic diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) compared with primary care team screenings at the point-of-care (POC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DECC model involved one person scheduling stand-alone, non-mydriatic diabetic eye-screening appointments, while the POC model incorporated these screenings into primary care visits. Metrics analyzed included average weekly screening (AWS), rate of DR, and percentage of gradable images (%GI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DECC model significantly increased AWS (from 7.3 to 15.8, p=.0005) and %GI (from 70.90% to 83.5%, p=.002). The rate of DR was similar across both models (32.77% POC vs. 34.18% DECC, p=.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a DECC model significantly boosts the efficiency of diabetic retinopathy screening processes in FQHCs, potentially enhancing vision preservation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","volume":"36 1","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonmydriatic Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in the Federally Qualified Health Center Primary Care Setting: Comparison of Active Outreach Versus Point-of-Care Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Adam G Hidad, Paul J Bryar\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hpu.2025.a951586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the efficacy of a diabetic eye care coordinator (DECC) conducting non-mydriatic diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) compared with primary care team screenings at the point-of-care (POC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DECC model involved one person scheduling stand-alone, non-mydriatic diabetic eye-screening appointments, while the POC model incorporated these screenings into primary care visits. Metrics analyzed included average weekly screening (AWS), rate of DR, and percentage of gradable images (%GI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DECC model significantly increased AWS (from 7.3 to 15.8, p=.0005) and %GI (from 70.90% to 83.5%, p=.002). The rate of DR was similar across both models (32.77% POC vs. 34.18% DECC, p=.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a DECC model significantly boosts the efficiency of diabetic retinopathy screening processes in FQHCs, potentially enhancing vision preservation efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"75-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2025.a951586\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2025.a951586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估糖尿病眼保健协调员(DECC)在联邦合格医疗中心(fqhc)进行非糖尿病性糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)筛查的效果,并与在护理点(POC)进行初级保健团队筛查的效果进行比较。方法:DECC模型涉及一个人安排独立的非糖尿病眼筛查预约,而POC模型将这些筛查纳入初级保健就诊。分析的指标包括平均每周筛查(AWS)、DR率和可分级图像的百分比(%GI)。结果:DECC模型显著提高AWS(从7.3提高到15.8,p= 0.0005)和%GI(从70.90%提高到83.5%,p= 0.002)。两种模型的DR率相似(POC为32.77%,DECC为34.18%,p= 0.89)。结论:实施DECC模型可显著提高fqhc患者糖尿病视网膜病变筛查过程的效率,可能加强视力保护工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonmydriatic Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in the Federally Qualified Health Center Primary Care Setting: Comparison of Active Outreach Versus Point-of-Care Testing.

Purpose: This study evaluates the efficacy of a diabetic eye care coordinator (DECC) conducting non-mydriatic diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) compared with primary care team screenings at the point-of-care (POC).

Methods: The DECC model involved one person scheduling stand-alone, non-mydriatic diabetic eye-screening appointments, while the POC model incorporated these screenings into primary care visits. Metrics analyzed included average weekly screening (AWS), rate of DR, and percentage of gradable images (%GI).

Results: The DECC model significantly increased AWS (from 7.3 to 15.8, p=.0005) and %GI (from 70.90% to 83.5%, p=.002). The rate of DR was similar across both models (32.77% POC vs. 34.18% DECC, p=.89).

Conclusion: Implementing a DECC model significantly boosts the efficiency of diabetic retinopathy screening processes in FQHCs, potentially enhancing vision preservation efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: The journal has as its goal the dissemination of information on the health of, and health care for, low income and other medically underserved communities to health care practitioners, policy makers, and community leaders who are in a position to effect meaningful change. Issues dealt with include access to, quality of, and cost of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信