替西帕肽在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的肾效应和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Abm Kamrul-Hasan, Shinjan Patra, Deep Dutta, Lakshmi Nagendra, Afm Muntahi-Reza, Sanja Borozan, Joseph M Pappachan
{"title":"替西帕肽在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的肾效应和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abm Kamrul-Hasan, Shinjan Patra, Deep Dutta, Lakshmi Nagendra, Afm Muntahi-Reza, Sanja Borozan, Joseph M Pappachan","doi":"10.4239/wjd.v16.i2.101282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (T2D), as well as obesity, are risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease. The renal impacts of glucose-lowering and weight-lowering drugs and their potential benefits in preventing CKD often guide clinicians in choosing them appropriately. Only limited data based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is currently available on the renal effects and safety profile of tirzepatide.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the renal benefits and safety of tirzepatide <i>vs</i> controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RCTs involving patients receiving tirzepatide for any indication in the intervention arm and placebo or active comparator in the control arm were searched through multiple electronic databases. The co-primary outcomes were percent change from baseline (CFB) in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and absolute CFB in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; in mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>); the secondary outcome was tirzepatide's renal safety profile. RevMan web was used to conduct meta-analysis using random-effects models. Outcomes were presented as mean differences (MD) or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs (<i>n</i> = 14471) with mostly low risk of bias (RoB) were included. Over 26-72 weeks, tirzepatide 10 mg [MD -26.95% (-40.13, -13.76), <i>P</i> < 0.0001] and 15 mg [MD -18.03% (-28.58, -7.47), <i>P</i> = 0.0008] were superior to placebo in percent reductions of UACR. Tirzepatide, at all doses, outperformed insulin in percent reductions of UACR. Compared to the placebo, the percent UACR reduction was greater in subjects with T2D than those with obesity but without T2D (MD -33.25% <i>vs</i> -7.93%; <i>P</i> = 0.001). The CFB in eGFR with all doses of tirzepatide was comparable [5 mg: MD 0.36 (-1.41, 2.14); 10 mg: MD 1.17 (-0.22, 2.56); 15 mg: MD 1.42 (-0.04, 2.88)]; <i>P</i> > 0.05 for all] <i>vs</i> insulin. Tirzepatide (pooled and separate doses) did not increase the risks of adverse renal events, urinary tract infection, nephrolithiasis, acute kidney injury, and renal cancer compared to the placebo, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term data from RCTs with low RoB suggests that tirzepatide positively impacts UACR without detrimental effects on eGFR in subjects with T2D and obesity without T2D, with a reassuring renal safety profile. Larger RCTs are warranted to prove the longer-term renal benefits of tirzepatide, which might also prevent eGFR decline and worsening of CKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48607,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Diabetes","volume":"16 2","pages":"101282"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renal effects and safety of tirzepatide in subjects with and without diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abm Kamrul-Hasan, Shinjan Patra, Deep Dutta, Lakshmi Nagendra, Afm Muntahi-Reza, Sanja Borozan, Joseph M Pappachan\",\"doi\":\"10.4239/wjd.v16.i2.101282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (T2D), as well as obesity, are risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease. The renal impacts of glucose-lowering and weight-lowering drugs and their potential benefits in preventing CKD often guide clinicians in choosing them appropriately. Only limited data based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is currently available on the renal effects and safety profile of tirzepatide.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the renal benefits and safety of tirzepatide <i>vs</i> controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RCTs involving patients receiving tirzepatide for any indication in the intervention arm and placebo or active comparator in the control arm were searched through multiple electronic databases. The co-primary outcomes were percent change from baseline (CFB) in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and absolute CFB in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; in mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>); the secondary outcome was tirzepatide's renal safety profile. RevMan web was used to conduct meta-analysis using random-effects models. Outcomes were presented as mean differences (MD) or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs (<i>n</i> = 14471) with mostly low risk of bias (RoB) were included. Over 26-72 weeks, tirzepatide 10 mg [MD -26.95% (-40.13, -13.76), <i>P</i> < 0.0001] and 15 mg [MD -18.03% (-28.58, -7.47), <i>P</i> = 0.0008] were superior to placebo in percent reductions of UACR. Tirzepatide, at all doses, outperformed insulin in percent reductions of UACR. Compared to the placebo, the percent UACR reduction was greater in subjects with T2D than those with obesity but without T2D (MD -33.25% <i>vs</i> -7.93%; <i>P</i> = 0.001). The CFB in eGFR with all doses of tirzepatide was comparable [5 mg: MD 0.36 (-1.41, 2.14); 10 mg: MD 1.17 (-0.22, 2.56); 15 mg: MD 1.42 (-0.04, 2.88)]; <i>P</i> > 0.05 for all] <i>vs</i> insulin. Tirzepatide (pooled and separate doses) did not increase the risks of adverse renal events, urinary tract infection, nephrolithiasis, acute kidney injury, and renal cancer compared to the placebo, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term data from RCTs with low RoB suggests that tirzepatide positively impacts UACR without detrimental effects on eGFR in subjects with T2D and obesity without T2D, with a reassuring renal safety profile. Larger RCTs are warranted to prove the longer-term renal benefits of tirzepatide, which might also prevent eGFR decline and worsening of CKD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"101282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718474/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i2.101282\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i2.101282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2型糖尿病(T2D)和肥胖是慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)和终末期肾脏疾病的危险因素。降糖药和减肥药对肾脏的影响及其在预防慢性肾病方面的潜在益处经常指导临床医生正确选择它们。目前只有基于随机对照试验(rct)的有限数据可用于替西帕肽的肾脏效应和安全性。目的:探讨替西帕肽与对照组相比对肾脏的益处和安全性。方法:通过多个电子数据库检索干预组接受替西帕肽治疗的患者和对照组接受安慰剂或活性比较剂治疗的患者的随机对照试验。共同主要结局是尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(UACR)的基线变化百分比(CFB)和估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR;单位:mL/min/1.73 m2);次要终点是替西帕肽的肾脏安全性。采用RevMan web进行meta分析,采用随机效应模型。结果以平均差异(MD)或95%置信区间的风险比表示。结果:纳入15项rct (n = 14471),多数为低偏倚风险(RoB)。在26-72周内,替西帕肽10 mg [MD -26.95% (-40.13, -13.76), P < 0.0001]和15 mg [MD -18.03% (-28.58, -7.47), P = 0.0008]在UACR降低百分比方面优于安慰剂。在降低UACR百分比方面,替西帕肽在所有剂量下都优于胰岛素。与安慰剂相比,患有T2D的受试者UACR降低的百分比大于肥胖但没有T2D的受试者(MD -33.25% vs -7.93%;P = 0.001)。所有剂量替西帕肽的eGFR CFB相当[5 mg: MD 0.36 (-1.41, 2.14);10 mg: MD 1.17 (-0.22, 2.56);15毫克:MD 1.42 (-0.04, 2.88)];P[0.05]与胰岛素比较。与安慰剂、胰岛素和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂相比,替西帕肽(合并剂量和单独剂量)没有增加不良肾脏事件、尿路感染、肾结石、急性肾损伤和肾癌的风险。结论:来自低RoB的随机对照试验的短期数据表明,替西肽对T2D和肥胖无T2D患者的UACR有积极影响,而对eGFR没有不利影响,具有可靠的肾脏安全性。需要更大的随机对照试验来证明替西帕肽对肾脏的长期益处,它也可能防止eGFR下降和CKD恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renal effects and safety of tirzepatide in subjects with and without diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D), as well as obesity, are risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease. The renal impacts of glucose-lowering and weight-lowering drugs and their potential benefits in preventing CKD often guide clinicians in choosing them appropriately. Only limited data based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is currently available on the renal effects and safety profile of tirzepatide.

Aim: To explore the renal benefits and safety of tirzepatide vs controls.

Methods: RCTs involving patients receiving tirzepatide for any indication in the intervention arm and placebo or active comparator in the control arm were searched through multiple electronic databases. The co-primary outcomes were percent change from baseline (CFB) in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and absolute CFB in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; in mL/min/1.73 m2); the secondary outcome was tirzepatide's renal safety profile. RevMan web was used to conduct meta-analysis using random-effects models. Outcomes were presented as mean differences (MD) or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Fifteen RCTs (n = 14471) with mostly low risk of bias (RoB) were included. Over 26-72 weeks, tirzepatide 10 mg [MD -26.95% (-40.13, -13.76), P < 0.0001] and 15 mg [MD -18.03% (-28.58, -7.47), P = 0.0008] were superior to placebo in percent reductions of UACR. Tirzepatide, at all doses, outperformed insulin in percent reductions of UACR. Compared to the placebo, the percent UACR reduction was greater in subjects with T2D than those with obesity but without T2D (MD -33.25% vs -7.93%; P = 0.001). The CFB in eGFR with all doses of tirzepatide was comparable [5 mg: MD 0.36 (-1.41, 2.14); 10 mg: MD 1.17 (-0.22, 2.56); 15 mg: MD 1.42 (-0.04, 2.88)]; P > 0.05 for all] vs insulin. Tirzepatide (pooled and separate doses) did not increase the risks of adverse renal events, urinary tract infection, nephrolithiasis, acute kidney injury, and renal cancer compared to the placebo, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

Conclusion: Short-term data from RCTs with low RoB suggests that tirzepatide positively impacts UACR without detrimental effects on eGFR in subjects with T2D and obesity without T2D, with a reassuring renal safety profile. Larger RCTs are warranted to prove the longer-term renal benefits of tirzepatide, which might also prevent eGFR decline and worsening of CKD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Diabetes
World Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
自引率
2.40%
发文量
909
期刊介绍: The WJD is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJD is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of diabetes. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJD is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJD are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in diabetes. Scope: Diabetes Complications, Experimental Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes, Gestational, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Cardiomyopathies, Diabetic Coma, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Neuropathies, Donohue Syndrome, Fetal Macrosomia, and Prediabetic State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信