处理实验动物工人少报职业事故的评估。

Q4 Medicine
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1275
Flávia Soares Lessa, Isabella Brasil Succi, Gilberto Marcelo Sperandio da Silva
{"title":"处理实验动物工人少报职业事故的评估。","authors":"Flávia Soares Lessa, Isabella Brasil Succi, Gilberto Marcelo Sperandio da Silva","doi":"10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Occupational accidents pose a substantial health risk and represent a critical public health concern. While reporting occupational accidents is legally mandated, occupational accidents are significantly underreported, leading to institutional challenges and obstacles in planning and implementing preventive policies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how often workers who handle laboratory animals report their occupational accidents at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz and to correlate this rate with their possible causes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational cohort study including workers who handle laboratory animals at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Data were collected from questionnaires that these workers filled in and then compared to the accident records reported to the Núcleo de Saúde do Trabalhador (Brazil Workers' Health Center) between 2014 and 2019. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture for data entry and Stata 14 for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Occupational accidents were underreported by 44.8% of the workers who handle laboratory animals at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. The characteristics of those who mostly underreported were women (63.6%), of mixed-race (55.6%), 35-44 years old (53.3%), with a doctorate degree (80%), and permanently employed (50%). The most common types of occupational accident reported in the questionnaires were scratches (17.2%) and bites (13.8%), while the most common injuries recorded were cuts (26.7%) and trips/falls (17.8%). Reasons for non-notification were apparent minor severity (57.2%), unwillingness to report (14.3%), no specific protocol to treat (14.3%), excessive bureaucracy (7.1%), and high occurrence (7.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The underreporting rate of occupational accidents is 44.8% at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Workers' awareness of the importance and compulsory nature of reporting should be raised to reduce this rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":38694,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho","volume":"22 4","pages":"e20241275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of underreporting occupational accidents among workers who handle laboratory animals.\",\"authors\":\"Flávia Soares Lessa, Isabella Brasil Succi, Gilberto Marcelo Sperandio da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Occupational accidents pose a substantial health risk and represent a critical public health concern. While reporting occupational accidents is legally mandated, occupational accidents are significantly underreported, leading to institutional challenges and obstacles in planning and implementing preventive policies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how often workers who handle laboratory animals report their occupational accidents at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz and to correlate this rate with their possible causes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational cohort study including workers who handle laboratory animals at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Data were collected from questionnaires that these workers filled in and then compared to the accident records reported to the Núcleo de Saúde do Trabalhador (Brazil Workers' Health Center) between 2014 and 2019. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture for data entry and Stata 14 for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Occupational accidents were underreported by 44.8% of the workers who handle laboratory animals at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. The characteristics of those who mostly underreported were women (63.6%), of mixed-race (55.6%), 35-44 years old (53.3%), with a doctorate degree (80%), and permanently employed (50%). The most common types of occupational accident reported in the questionnaires were scratches (17.2%) and bites (13.8%), while the most common injuries recorded were cuts (26.7%) and trips/falls (17.8%). Reasons for non-notification were apparent minor severity (57.2%), unwillingness to report (14.3%), no specific protocol to treat (14.3%), excessive bureaucracy (7.1%), and high occurrence (7.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The underreporting rate of occupational accidents is 44.8% at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Workers' awareness of the importance and compulsory nature of reporting should be raised to reduce this rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"e20241275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822970/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业事故构成重大的健康风险,是一个重要的公共卫生问题。虽然报告职业事故是法律规定的,但职业事故的报告严重不足,导致在规划和执行预防政策方面的体制挑战和障碍。目的:评估处理实验动物的工人报告其职业事故的频率,并将这一比率与可能的原因联系起来(Ciência e tecologia em biomedical / funda o Oswaldo Cruz)。方法:这是一项观察性队列研究,包括在Ciência e tecologia em Biomodelos研究所/ funda o Oswaldo Cruz处理实验动物的工作人员。数据是从这些工人填写的问卷中收集的,然后与2014年至2019年期间向Núcleo de Saúde do Trabalhador(巴西工人健康中心)报告的事故记录进行比较。我们使用Research Electronic Data Capture进行数据输入,使用Stata 14进行统计分析。结果:Ciência e tecologia em Biomodelos研究所/ o Oswaldo Cruz基金会处理实验动物的工人中有44.8%的职业事故漏报。低报的主要特征是女性(63.6%)、混血(55.6%)、35-44岁(53.3%)、拥有博士学位(80%)和长期就业(50%)。调查问卷中最常见的职业意外类型是抓伤(17.2%)和咬伤(13.8%),而最常见的伤害是割伤(26.7%)和绊倒/跌倒(17.8%)。未通报原因为明显轻微(57.2%)、不愿报告(14.3%)、无特定治疗方案(14.3%)、官僚主义过度(7.1%)和高发生率(7.1%)。结论:在Ciência生物技术研究所/ o Oswaldo Cruz基金会,职业事故漏报率为44.8%。应提高工人对报告的重要性和强制性的认识,以降低这一比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of underreporting occupational accidents among workers who handle laboratory animals.

Introduction: Occupational accidents pose a substantial health risk and represent a critical public health concern. While reporting occupational accidents is legally mandated, occupational accidents are significantly underreported, leading to institutional challenges and obstacles in planning and implementing preventive policies.

Objectives: To evaluate how often workers who handle laboratory animals report their occupational accidents at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz and to correlate this rate with their possible causes.

Methods: This is an observational cohort study including workers who handle laboratory animals at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Data were collected from questionnaires that these workers filled in and then compared to the accident records reported to the Núcleo de Saúde do Trabalhador (Brazil Workers' Health Center) between 2014 and 2019. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture for data entry and Stata 14 for statistical analysis.

Results: Occupational accidents were underreported by 44.8% of the workers who handle laboratory animals at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. The characteristics of those who mostly underreported were women (63.6%), of mixed-race (55.6%), 35-44 years old (53.3%), with a doctorate degree (80%), and permanently employed (50%). The most common types of occupational accident reported in the questionnaires were scratches (17.2%) and bites (13.8%), while the most common injuries recorded were cuts (26.7%) and trips/falls (17.8%). Reasons for non-notification were apparent minor severity (57.2%), unwillingness to report (14.3%), no specific protocol to treat (14.3%), excessive bureaucracy (7.1%), and high occurrence (7.1%).

Conclusions: The underreporting rate of occupational accidents is 44.8% at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Workers' awareness of the importance and compulsory nature of reporting should be raised to reduce this rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信