“毒蛇肉汤”:弗朗西斯·霍姆(1719-1813)和他对毒蛇肉汤治疗皮肤病的益处的实验。

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Shanghavie Loganathan, Max Cooper
{"title":"“毒蛇肉汤”:弗朗西斯·霍姆(1719-1813)和他对毒蛇肉汤治疗皮肤病的益处的实验。","authors":"Shanghavie Loganathan, Max Cooper","doi":"10.1177/09677720251317804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Francis Home (1719-1813) was a Scottish physician and medical author. Here we consider his biography and three brief accounts of experiments on viper (i.e. adder flesh) broth in the treatment of skin disease ('Herpes or Lepra Gracaeorum'). After a fortnight of treatment one patient was improved but not cured (discontinued due to lack of vipers), one 'almost cured' but refused further treatment at 'disgust' of discovering its contents, and one dismissed cured. The second case constitutes a basic 'cross-over' model as it led to comparison of viper with snail broth in the same patient. Home concluded that viper broth was beneficial for skin disease but his findings did not lead to wider adoption of the treatment. His reported clinical benefits likely arose from improved hydration, protein and cessation of other treatments. Home does not discuss his small sample size or present quantitative outcomes. Home's methods were not influenced by Lind's (1753) methodology for comparing treatments. As both were Edinburgh-trained Scots who served in the British military forces, this reveals the limited communication between clinicians of the day. Home appears to have faced many practical challenges, including accessing vipers, motivating patients' participation and the risk of concomitant treatment with other drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Biography","volume":" ","pages":"9677720251317804"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Jus viperinum': Francis Home (1719-1813) and his experiments on the benefits of viper broth in skin disease.\",\"authors\":\"Shanghavie Loganathan, Max Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09677720251317804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Francis Home (1719-1813) was a Scottish physician and medical author. Here we consider his biography and three brief accounts of experiments on viper (i.e. adder flesh) broth in the treatment of skin disease ('Herpes or Lepra Gracaeorum'). After a fortnight of treatment one patient was improved but not cured (discontinued due to lack of vipers), one 'almost cured' but refused further treatment at 'disgust' of discovering its contents, and one dismissed cured. The second case constitutes a basic 'cross-over' model as it led to comparison of viper with snail broth in the same patient. Home concluded that viper broth was beneficial for skin disease but his findings did not lead to wider adoption of the treatment. His reported clinical benefits likely arose from improved hydration, protein and cessation of other treatments. Home does not discuss his small sample size or present quantitative outcomes. Home's methods were not influenced by Lind's (1753) methodology for comparing treatments. As both were Edinburgh-trained Scots who served in the British military forces, this reveals the limited communication between clinicians of the day. Home appears to have faced many practical challenges, including accessing vipers, motivating patients' participation and the risk of concomitant treatment with other drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Biography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9677720251317804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Biography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09677720251317804\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Biography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09677720251317804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弗朗西斯·霍姆(1719-1813)是一位苏格兰医生和医学作家。在这里,我们考虑他的传记和三个简短的实验毒蛇(即蝰蛇肉)肉汤治疗皮肤病(“疱疹或Lepra gracacaeorum”)。经过两周的治疗,一名患者有所好转,但没有治愈(由于缺乏毒蛇而停止),一名患者“几乎治愈”,但因发现其内容物而“厌恶”而拒绝进一步治疗,还有一名患者认为已经治愈。第二个病例构成了一个基本的“交叉”模型,因为它导致了同一患者毒蛇汤和蜗牛汤的比较。Home得出结论,毒蛇肉汤对皮肤病有益,但他的发现并没有导致更广泛地采用这种治疗方法。他报告的临床益处可能来自于改善的水合作用、蛋白质和停止其他治疗。Home没有讨论他的小样本量或目前的定量结果。Home的方法没有受到Lind(1753)比较治疗方法的影响。由于两人都是在爱丁堡受训的苏格兰人,曾在英国军队服役,这揭示了当时临床医生之间的交流有限。Home似乎面临着许多实际的挑战,包括接触毒蛇、激励患者参与以及与其他药物同时治疗的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Jus viperinum': Francis Home (1719-1813) and his experiments on the benefits of viper broth in skin disease.

Francis Home (1719-1813) was a Scottish physician and medical author. Here we consider his biography and three brief accounts of experiments on viper (i.e. adder flesh) broth in the treatment of skin disease ('Herpes or Lepra Gracaeorum'). After a fortnight of treatment one patient was improved but not cured (discontinued due to lack of vipers), one 'almost cured' but refused further treatment at 'disgust' of discovering its contents, and one dismissed cured. The second case constitutes a basic 'cross-over' model as it led to comparison of viper with snail broth in the same patient. Home concluded that viper broth was beneficial for skin disease but his findings did not lead to wider adoption of the treatment. His reported clinical benefits likely arose from improved hydration, protein and cessation of other treatments. Home does not discuss his small sample size or present quantitative outcomes. Home's methods were not influenced by Lind's (1753) methodology for comparing treatments. As both were Edinburgh-trained Scots who served in the British military forces, this reveals the limited communication between clinicians of the day. Home appears to have faced many practical challenges, including accessing vipers, motivating patients' participation and the risk of concomitant treatment with other drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Biography
Journal of Medical Biography HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: This international quarterly publication focuses on the lives of people in or associated with medicine, those considered legendary as well as the less well known. The journal includes much original research about figures from history and their afflictions, thus providing an interesting, fresh and new perspective which can lead to greater understanding of each subject. Journal of Medical Biography is a fascinating and compelling read, providing an insight into the origins of modern medicine and the characters and personalities that made it what it is today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信