评估轴向麻醉与产后背痛之间的关系:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/anrp/2105413
Sara Timerga, Getaw Walle, Wondwosen Mebratu, Aynalem Befkadu
{"title":"评估轴向麻醉与产后背痛之间的关系:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sara Timerga, Getaw Walle, Wondwosen Mebratu, Aynalem Befkadu","doi":"10.1155/anrp/2105413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Back pain after delivery both under cesarean section and spontaneous vaginal delivery is the most common pregnancy-related musculoskeletal problem. There are multiple studies that emphasize the effect of epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on the incidence and severity of postdelivery back pain. There are others stating no association between the two. <b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study is to summarize the relationship between back pain after delivery and neuraxial anesthesia. <b>Methods:</b> Studies identified from database: Cochrane Library, The Virtual Health Library, National Library of Medicine PubMed, Google Scholar, and citation searching with both experimental and observational study design were included. Exposed and nonexposed incidence of back pain was extracted to analyze the pooled odds ratio assessing the association of postpartum back pain and neuraxial anesthesia. Heterogeneity was checked across studies using Cochrane <i>Q</i> test statistic and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>. Small study effect was assessed using a funnel plot graphically and nonparametric rank correlation (Begg) test. <b>Results:</b> Four RCT and 11 observational studies were identified for analysis. The studies included mothers delivering under cesarean section and vaginal delivery with epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Based on the 15 studies included in this meta-analysis, the pooled odds ratio according to random effect restricted maximum-likelihood model was 1.2 (95% CI (0.77-1.86)) with <i>p</i> value = 0.43. There was a significant heterogeneity with <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 97.76%, <i>H</i> <sup>2</sup> = 44.58, and Cochrane <i>Q</i> statistics <i>p</i> value = 0.001. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our result suggests neuraxial anesthesia may not be the cause or the risk factor for the overwhelmingly high incidence of back pain women experience after delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2105413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11824844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the Association Between Neuraxial Anesthesia and Back Pain After Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Timerga, Getaw Walle, Wondwosen Mebratu, Aynalem Befkadu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/anrp/2105413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Back pain after delivery both under cesarean section and spontaneous vaginal delivery is the most common pregnancy-related musculoskeletal problem. There are multiple studies that emphasize the effect of epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on the incidence and severity of postdelivery back pain. There are others stating no association between the two. <b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study is to summarize the relationship between back pain after delivery and neuraxial anesthesia. <b>Methods:</b> Studies identified from database: Cochrane Library, The Virtual Health Library, National Library of Medicine PubMed, Google Scholar, and citation searching with both experimental and observational study design were included. Exposed and nonexposed incidence of back pain was extracted to analyze the pooled odds ratio assessing the association of postpartum back pain and neuraxial anesthesia. Heterogeneity was checked across studies using Cochrane <i>Q</i> test statistic and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>. Small study effect was assessed using a funnel plot graphically and nonparametric rank correlation (Begg) test. <b>Results:</b> Four RCT and 11 observational studies were identified for analysis. The studies included mothers delivering under cesarean section and vaginal delivery with epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Based on the 15 studies included in this meta-analysis, the pooled odds ratio according to random effect restricted maximum-likelihood model was 1.2 (95% CI (0.77-1.86)) with <i>p</i> value = 0.43. There was a significant heterogeneity with <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 97.76%, <i>H</i> <sup>2</sup> = 44.58, and Cochrane <i>Q</i> statistics <i>p</i> value = 0.001. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our result suggests neuraxial anesthesia may not be the cause or the risk factor for the overwhelmingly high incidence of back pain women experience after delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2105413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11824844/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/2105413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/2105413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产和自然阴道分娩后背部疼痛是最常见的妊娠相关肌肉骨骼问题。有多项研究强调硬膜外麻醉和脊髓麻醉对分娩后背部疼痛的发生率和严重程度的影响。还有一些人说这两者之间没有联系。目的:总结神经轴麻醉与产后腰痛的关系。方法:从Cochrane图书馆、The Virtual Health Library、National Library of Medicine PubMed、谷歌Scholar等数据库中筛选的研究,并采用实验和观察性研究设计进行引文检索。提取暴露和未暴露的背痛发生率,分析评估产后背痛与神经轴麻醉关系的合并优势比。采用Cochrane Q检验统计量和i2检验各研究的异质性。采用漏斗图和非参数秩相关(Begg)检验评估小研究效果。结果:4项RCT和11项观察性研究被纳入分析。研究对象包括剖宫产、阴道分娩、硬膜外麻醉、脊髓麻醉和脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉。本meta分析纳入的15项研究中,随机效应限制最大似然模型的合并优势比为1.2 (95% CI (0.77-1.86)), p值= 0.43。异质性显著,i2 = 97.76%, h2 = 44.58, Cochrane Q统计p值= 0.001。结论:我们的研究结果表明,神经轴麻醉可能不是产妇产后背痛发生率极高的原因或危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the Association Between Neuraxial Anesthesia and Back Pain After Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Back pain after delivery both under cesarean section and spontaneous vaginal delivery is the most common pregnancy-related musculoskeletal problem. There are multiple studies that emphasize the effect of epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on the incidence and severity of postdelivery back pain. There are others stating no association between the two. Objective: The aim of this study is to summarize the relationship between back pain after delivery and neuraxial anesthesia. Methods: Studies identified from database: Cochrane Library, The Virtual Health Library, National Library of Medicine PubMed, Google Scholar, and citation searching with both experimental and observational study design were included. Exposed and nonexposed incidence of back pain was extracted to analyze the pooled odds ratio assessing the association of postpartum back pain and neuraxial anesthesia. Heterogeneity was checked across studies using Cochrane Q test statistic and I 2. Small study effect was assessed using a funnel plot graphically and nonparametric rank correlation (Begg) test. Results: Four RCT and 11 observational studies were identified for analysis. The studies included mothers delivering under cesarean section and vaginal delivery with epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Based on the 15 studies included in this meta-analysis, the pooled odds ratio according to random effect restricted maximum-likelihood model was 1.2 (95% CI (0.77-1.86)) with p value = 0.43. There was a significant heterogeneity with I 2 = 97.76%, H 2 = 44.58, and Cochrane Q statistics p value = 0.001. Conclusion: Our result suggests neuraxial anesthesia may not be the cause or the risk factor for the overwhelmingly high incidence of back pain women experience after delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信