蒸汽侵入评价中扩散的新认识被动吸附扩散采样器

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES
Michael Niemet, Ben Thompson, Katie Rabe, Harry O'Neill
{"title":"蒸汽侵入评价中扩散的新认识被动吸附扩散采样器","authors":"Michael Niemet,&nbsp;Ben Thompson,&nbsp;Katie Rabe,&nbsp;Harry O'Neill","doi":"10.1111/gwmr.12683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vapor intrusion of toxic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from subsurface soil vapor, through a building slab/floor, and into the indoor air is an important environmental contaminant transport mechanism. It is widely believed that advective flow, driven by the pressure differential between the subslab and indoor air, is the primary mechanism of subslab soil vapor entry into buildings. This paper explores the hypothesis that molecular diffusion through the slab may potentially play a larger role in vapor intrusion than previously believed and may even be the predominant vapor intrusion mechanism when the subslab vapor source strength is sufficiently high or the pressure differential is relatively low. A novel sampling device, referred to as a Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Sampler (PADS), is presented for the purpose of directly measuring the diffusion of VOCs through a building slab. A vacant warehouse was identified as a case study site where historical sampling had determined that vapor intrusion of trichloroethene (TCE) was adversely impacting the indoor air. Calculations using Fick's First Law of Diffusion are presented which demonstrate that diffusion alone can theoretically account for all the TCE observed in the indoor air at this building based on an effective diffusion coefficient for concrete that was calculated from the Johnson and Ettinger Model. Two groups of nine replicate PADS were deployed at two areas on the slab and used to measure the flux and effective diffusion coefficient at each of the 18 total points, which showed an order of magnitude variability within each area and over two orders of magnitude variability overall. These results indicate that diffusion through concrete is inherently variable when measured at a sub-meter scale. However, when combined over both areas, the overall average approached that calculated from the Johnson and Ettinger Model. An additional 12 PADS were deployed across the building slab (for a total of 30) to quantify the overall building-wide diffusive flux. This area-weighted average diffusive flux was consistent with the predicted diffusive flux as calculated from Fick's First Law and the vapor intrusion mass input required to achieve the observed indoor air TCE concentration. The results of this study show that PADS provides a simple way to measure diffusive flux directly without having to drill through the slab. However, significant variability in the measured flux should be expected and will need to be accounted for by the inclusion of a relatively large number of samples including replicates. When using PADs at a new site, the collection of traditional subslab vapors at a select number of locations is recommended for the verification of a building-specific effective diffusion coefficient, which may not necessarily be the same as for this building.</p>","PeriodicalId":55081,"journal":{"name":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","volume":"45 1","pages":"30-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Look at Diffusion in Vapor Intrusion Assessments; Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Samplers\",\"authors\":\"Michael Niemet,&nbsp;Ben Thompson,&nbsp;Katie Rabe,&nbsp;Harry O'Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwmr.12683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Vapor intrusion of toxic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from subsurface soil vapor, through a building slab/floor, and into the indoor air is an important environmental contaminant transport mechanism. It is widely believed that advective flow, driven by the pressure differential between the subslab and indoor air, is the primary mechanism of subslab soil vapor entry into buildings. This paper explores the hypothesis that molecular diffusion through the slab may potentially play a larger role in vapor intrusion than previously believed and may even be the predominant vapor intrusion mechanism when the subslab vapor source strength is sufficiently high or the pressure differential is relatively low. A novel sampling device, referred to as a Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Sampler (PADS), is presented for the purpose of directly measuring the diffusion of VOCs through a building slab. A vacant warehouse was identified as a case study site where historical sampling had determined that vapor intrusion of trichloroethene (TCE) was adversely impacting the indoor air. Calculations using Fick's First Law of Diffusion are presented which demonstrate that diffusion alone can theoretically account for all the TCE observed in the indoor air at this building based on an effective diffusion coefficient for concrete that was calculated from the Johnson and Ettinger Model. Two groups of nine replicate PADS were deployed at two areas on the slab and used to measure the flux and effective diffusion coefficient at each of the 18 total points, which showed an order of magnitude variability within each area and over two orders of magnitude variability overall. These results indicate that diffusion through concrete is inherently variable when measured at a sub-meter scale. However, when combined over both areas, the overall average approached that calculated from the Johnson and Ettinger Model. An additional 12 PADS were deployed across the building slab (for a total of 30) to quantify the overall building-wide diffusive flux. This area-weighted average diffusive flux was consistent with the predicted diffusive flux as calculated from Fick's First Law and the vapor intrusion mass input required to achieve the observed indoor air TCE concentration. The results of this study show that PADS provides a simple way to measure diffusive flux directly without having to drill through the slab. However, significant variability in the measured flux should be expected and will need to be accounted for by the inclusion of a relatively large number of samples including replicates. When using PADs at a new site, the collection of traditional subslab vapors at a select number of locations is recommended for the verification of a building-specific effective diffusion coefficient, which may not necessarily be the same as for this building.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"30-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12683\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有毒挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)从地下土壤蒸汽中通过建筑楼板/地板进入室内空气是一种重要的环境污染物输送机制。人们普遍认为,由底板与室内空气压差驱动的平流是底板土壤水汽进入建筑物的主要机制。本文探讨了一种假设,即当板下蒸汽源强度足够高或压差相对较低时,通过板的分子扩散可能在蒸汽侵入中发挥比以前认为的更大的作用,甚至可能是主要的蒸汽侵入机制。提出了一种新型的采样装置,即被动吸附扩散采样器(PADS),用于直接测量voc通过建筑板的扩散。一个空置的仓库被确定为案例研究地点,在那里,历史采样确定三氯乙烯(TCE)的蒸汽侵入对室内空气产生不利影响。利用菲克第一扩散定律进行的计算表明,根据Johnson和Ettinger模型计算的混凝土有效扩散系数,理论上,仅扩散就可以解释该建筑室内空气中观察到的所有TCE。在平板上的两个区域部署了两组9个重复PADS,用于测量18个总点中的每个点的通量和有效扩散系数,结果显示每个区域内的变化幅度有一个数量级,总体变化幅度超过两个数量级。这些结果表明,当在亚米尺度上测量时,通过混凝土的扩散是固有的变量。然而,当把这两个地区结合起来时,总体平均水平接近约翰逊和埃廷格模型计算出来的结果。另外12个pad在整个建筑面板上部署(总共30个),以量化整个建筑范围的扩散通量。该面积加权平均扩散通量与根据菲克第一定律计算的预测扩散通量以及达到观测室内空气TCE浓度所需的蒸汽侵入质量输入一致。本研究结果表明,PADS提供了一种直接测量扩散通量的简单方法,而无需钻穿板材。但是,应该预期测量到的通量有很大的可变性,并且需要通过纳入相对大量的样本(包括重复)来加以解释。当在新场地使用pad时,建议在选定的几个地点收集传统的板下蒸汽,以验证建筑物特定的有效扩散系数,该系数可能不一定与本建筑物相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A New Look at Diffusion in Vapor Intrusion Assessments; Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Samplers

A New Look at Diffusion in Vapor Intrusion Assessments; Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Samplers

A New Look at Diffusion in Vapor Intrusion Assessments; Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Samplers

A New Look at Diffusion in Vapor Intrusion Assessments; Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Samplers

A New Look at Diffusion in Vapor Intrusion Assessments; Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Samplers

Vapor intrusion of toxic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from subsurface soil vapor, through a building slab/floor, and into the indoor air is an important environmental contaminant transport mechanism. It is widely believed that advective flow, driven by the pressure differential between the subslab and indoor air, is the primary mechanism of subslab soil vapor entry into buildings. This paper explores the hypothesis that molecular diffusion through the slab may potentially play a larger role in vapor intrusion than previously believed and may even be the predominant vapor intrusion mechanism when the subslab vapor source strength is sufficiently high or the pressure differential is relatively low. A novel sampling device, referred to as a Passive Adsorptive Diffusion Sampler (PADS), is presented for the purpose of directly measuring the diffusion of VOCs through a building slab. A vacant warehouse was identified as a case study site where historical sampling had determined that vapor intrusion of trichloroethene (TCE) was adversely impacting the indoor air. Calculations using Fick's First Law of Diffusion are presented which demonstrate that diffusion alone can theoretically account for all the TCE observed in the indoor air at this building based on an effective diffusion coefficient for concrete that was calculated from the Johnson and Ettinger Model. Two groups of nine replicate PADS were deployed at two areas on the slab and used to measure the flux and effective diffusion coefficient at each of the 18 total points, which showed an order of magnitude variability within each area and over two orders of magnitude variability overall. These results indicate that diffusion through concrete is inherently variable when measured at a sub-meter scale. However, when combined over both areas, the overall average approached that calculated from the Johnson and Ettinger Model. An additional 12 PADS were deployed across the building slab (for a total of 30) to quantify the overall building-wide diffusive flux. This area-weighted average diffusive flux was consistent with the predicted diffusive flux as calculated from Fick's First Law and the vapor intrusion mass input required to achieve the observed indoor air TCE concentration. The results of this study show that PADS provides a simple way to measure diffusive flux directly without having to drill through the slab. However, significant variability in the measured flux should be expected and will need to be accounted for by the inclusion of a relatively large number of samples including replicates. When using PADs at a new site, the collection of traditional subslab vapors at a select number of locations is recommended for the verification of a building-specific effective diffusion coefficient, which may not necessarily be the same as for this building.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1981, Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation® has been a resource for researchers and practitioners in the field. It is a quarterly journal that offers the best in application oriented, peer-reviewed papers together with insightful articles from the practitioner''s perspective. Each issue features papers containing cutting-edge information on treatment technology, columns by industry experts, news briefs, and equipment news. GWMR plays a unique role in advancing the practice of the groundwater monitoring and remediation field by providing forward-thinking research with practical solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信