邻里剥夺与印度老年人社会凝聚力的关系:来自LASI的新证据

IF 1 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Angana Debnath, T.V. Sekher, Arup Jana
{"title":"邻里剥夺与印度老年人社会凝聚力的关系:来自LASI的新证据","authors":"Angana Debnath,&nbsp;T.V. Sekher,&nbsp;Arup Jana","doi":"10.1007/s12126-025-09592-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the relationship between neighborhood deprivation and social cohesion among older individuals in India. The research used data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India Wave-1 (2017–18), which included a substantial sample of 31,646 older adults. Bivariate and binary logistic regression analyses were employed to examine the association between neighborhood deprivation and social cohesion while accounting for potential confounders. The results indicate that 60.69% of older adults in India reported high social cohesion. Among the participants, 47% of those with low neighborhood deprivation reported high social cohesion. Married older adults reported higher social cohesion (59.9%) compared to widowed individuals (52.4%). Additionally, older adults living in urban areas had higher odds of reporting high social cohesion (aOR: 1.19; CI: 1.11–1.27) compared to those in rural areas. Interestingly, older adults living alone had lower odds of high social cohesion than those living with others (aOR: 0.74; CI: 0.63–0.86). Regional differences were also observed. Older adults residing in the West (aOR: 1.75; CI: 1.59–1.93), North-East (aOR: 1.45; CI: 1.30–1.61), and South (aOR: 1.19; CI: 1.09–1.29) regions of India had higher odds of high social cohesion compared to those in the Northern region. This study provides valuable insights into the determinants of social cohesion among older individuals in India. It highlights the interconnected nature of economic, demographic, and health-related factors in shaping social bonds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between Neighborhood Deprivation and Social Cohesion among Indian Older Adults: New Evidence from LASI\",\"authors\":\"Angana Debnath,&nbsp;T.V. Sekher,&nbsp;Arup Jana\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12126-025-09592-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the relationship between neighborhood deprivation and social cohesion among older individuals in India. The research used data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India Wave-1 (2017–18), which included a substantial sample of 31,646 older adults. Bivariate and binary logistic regression analyses were employed to examine the association between neighborhood deprivation and social cohesion while accounting for potential confounders. The results indicate that 60.69% of older adults in India reported high social cohesion. Among the participants, 47% of those with low neighborhood deprivation reported high social cohesion. Married older adults reported higher social cohesion (59.9%) compared to widowed individuals (52.4%). Additionally, older adults living in urban areas had higher odds of reporting high social cohesion (aOR: 1.19; CI: 1.11–1.27) compared to those in rural areas. Interestingly, older adults living alone had lower odds of high social cohesion than those living with others (aOR: 0.74; CI: 0.63–0.86). Regional differences were also observed. Older adults residing in the West (aOR: 1.75; CI: 1.59–1.93), North-East (aOR: 1.45; CI: 1.30–1.61), and South (aOR: 1.19; CI: 1.09–1.29) regions of India had higher odds of high social cohesion compared to those in the Northern region. This study provides valuable insights into the determinants of social cohesion among older individuals in India. It highlights the interconnected nature of economic, demographic, and health-related factors in shaping social bonds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ageing International\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ageing International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-025-09592-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-025-09592-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了印度老年人邻里剥夺与社会凝聚力之间的关系。该研究使用了印度纵向老龄化研究Wave-1(2017-18)的数据,其中包括31,646名老年人的大量样本。采用双变量和二元逻辑回归分析来检验邻里剥夺与社会凝聚力之间的关系,同时考虑潜在的混杂因素。结果表明,印度60.69%的老年人报告社会凝聚力高。在参与者中,47%的邻里剥夺程度较低的人表示社会凝聚力较高。已婚老年人的社会凝聚力(59.9%)高于丧偶者(52.4%)。此外,生活在城市地区的老年人报告高社会凝聚力的几率更高(aOR: 1.19;CI: 1.11-1.27),与农村地区相比。有趣的是,独居的老年人拥有高社会凝聚力的几率低于与他人同住的老年人(aOR: 0.74;置信区间:0.63—-0.86)。区域差异也被观察到。居住在西部的老年人(aOR: 1.75;CI: 1.59-1.93),东北(aOR: 1.45;CI: 1.30-1.61),南方(aOR: 1.19;CI: 1.09-1.29),与北部地区相比,印度地区具有更高的社会凝聚力。这项研究为印度老年人社会凝聚力的决定因素提供了有价值的见解。它突出了经济、人口和健康相关因素在形成社会纽带方面的相互联系性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between Neighborhood Deprivation and Social Cohesion among Indian Older Adults: New Evidence from LASI

This study investigates the relationship between neighborhood deprivation and social cohesion among older individuals in India. The research used data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India Wave-1 (2017–18), which included a substantial sample of 31,646 older adults. Bivariate and binary logistic regression analyses were employed to examine the association between neighborhood deprivation and social cohesion while accounting for potential confounders. The results indicate that 60.69% of older adults in India reported high social cohesion. Among the participants, 47% of those with low neighborhood deprivation reported high social cohesion. Married older adults reported higher social cohesion (59.9%) compared to widowed individuals (52.4%). Additionally, older adults living in urban areas had higher odds of reporting high social cohesion (aOR: 1.19; CI: 1.11–1.27) compared to those in rural areas. Interestingly, older adults living alone had lower odds of high social cohesion than those living with others (aOR: 0.74; CI: 0.63–0.86). Regional differences were also observed. Older adults residing in the West (aOR: 1.75; CI: 1.59–1.93), North-East (aOR: 1.45; CI: 1.30–1.61), and South (aOR: 1.19; CI: 1.09–1.29) regions of India had higher odds of high social cohesion compared to those in the Northern region. This study provides valuable insights into the determinants of social cohesion among older individuals in India. It highlights the interconnected nature of economic, demographic, and health-related factors in shaping social bonds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ageing International
Ageing International GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in: ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信