分析主要排放国实现《巴黎协定》气候目标的成本效益减排途径

Elena Hooijschuur , Michel G.J. den Elzen , Ioannis Dafnomilis , Detlef P. van Vuuren
{"title":"分析主要排放国实现《巴黎协定》气候目标的成本效益减排途径","authors":"Elena Hooijschuur ,&nbsp;Michel G.J. den Elzen ,&nbsp;Ioannis Dafnomilis ,&nbsp;Detlef P. van Vuuren","doi":"10.1016/j.gecadv.2025.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving the global climate goal of the Paris Agreement depends on collective action by individual countries, as reflected in the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). To inform the next NDCs to be submitted by 2025, which should include emission reduction targets for 2035/2040, this study aims to identify the reduction pathways required for major emitting economies to achieve the Paris Agreement climate targets at the lowest possible global mitigation costs. We selected least-cost mitigation scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models of the latest IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report scenario database for five major emitting economies (EU-27, China, India, Japan and the United States) and the world. We downscaled modelled regional emission pathways to the regional level for the five economies, harmonised the emission data with national inventory data, and analysed the results and assessed their robustness with respect to the methodology used. Since the results do not indicate how to account for equity and feasibility considerations, policymakers should not regard them as directly indicative of national targets. Our study shows that to keep global warming to 1.5 °C with at least 50 % probability and limited overshoot, the least-cost greenhouse gas reductions by 2040 for the EU-27, Japan and the United States are around 70 %–100 % relative to 2015 levels (including LULUCF). If the selection of scenarios is limited to those consistent with existing national targets, this range increases substantially to around 85–115 %. For China and India, ranges for both selections of scenarios are similar and around 65 %–80 % and 30 %–80 %, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100586,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Advances","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of cost-effective reduction pathways for major emitting countries to achieve the Paris Agreement climate goal\",\"authors\":\"Elena Hooijschuur ,&nbsp;Michel G.J. den Elzen ,&nbsp;Ioannis Dafnomilis ,&nbsp;Detlef P. van Vuuren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecadv.2025.100014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Achieving the global climate goal of the Paris Agreement depends on collective action by individual countries, as reflected in the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). To inform the next NDCs to be submitted by 2025, which should include emission reduction targets for 2035/2040, this study aims to identify the reduction pathways required for major emitting economies to achieve the Paris Agreement climate targets at the lowest possible global mitigation costs. We selected least-cost mitigation scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models of the latest IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report scenario database for five major emitting economies (EU-27, China, India, Japan and the United States) and the world. We downscaled modelled regional emission pathways to the regional level for the five economies, harmonised the emission data with national inventory data, and analysed the results and assessed their robustness with respect to the methodology used. Since the results do not indicate how to account for equity and feasibility considerations, policymakers should not regard them as directly indicative of national targets. Our study shows that to keep global warming to 1.5 °C with at least 50 % probability and limited overshoot, the least-cost greenhouse gas reductions by 2040 for the EU-27, Japan and the United States are around 70 %–100 % relative to 2015 levels (including LULUCF). If the selection of scenarios is limited to those consistent with existing national targets, this range increases substantially to around 85–115 %. For China and India, ranges for both selections of scenarios are similar and around 65 %–80 % and 30 %–80 %, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Environmental Change Advances\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Environmental Change Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950138525000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950138525000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现《巴黎协定》的全球气候目标取决于各国的集体行动,这体现在国家自主贡献(NDCs)中。为了向2025年之前提交的下一次国家自主贡献提供信息,其中应包括2035/2040年的减排目标,本研究旨在确定主要排放经济体以尽可能低的全球减排成本实现《巴黎协定》气候目标所需的减排途径。我们从IPCC最新的《第六次评估报告》情景数据库的综合评估模型中选择了五个主要排放经济体(欧盟27国、中国、印度、日本和美国)和世界上成本最低的缓解情景。我们将五个经济体的区域排放路径模型缩小到区域水平,将排放数据与国家清单数据协调起来,并分析了结果,并评估了它们在使用方法方面的稳健性。由于结果没有说明如何考虑公平性和可行性因素,决策者不应将其视为国家目标的直接指示。我们的研究表明,要将全球变暖控制在1.5°C以内,且有至少50% %的可能性和有限的超调,到2040年,欧盟27国、日本和美国的温室气体减排成本最低,相对于2015年的水平(包括LULUCF)约为70% % - 100% %。如果情景的选择仅限于符合现有国家目标的情景,则这一范围将大大增加到约85 - 115% %。对于中国和印度,两种情景选择的范围相似,分别在65% % - 80% %和30% % - 80% %左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of cost-effective reduction pathways for major emitting countries to achieve the Paris Agreement climate goal
Achieving the global climate goal of the Paris Agreement depends on collective action by individual countries, as reflected in the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). To inform the next NDCs to be submitted by 2025, which should include emission reduction targets for 2035/2040, this study aims to identify the reduction pathways required for major emitting economies to achieve the Paris Agreement climate targets at the lowest possible global mitigation costs. We selected least-cost mitigation scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models of the latest IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report scenario database for five major emitting economies (EU-27, China, India, Japan and the United States) and the world. We downscaled modelled regional emission pathways to the regional level for the five economies, harmonised the emission data with national inventory data, and analysed the results and assessed their robustness with respect to the methodology used. Since the results do not indicate how to account for equity and feasibility considerations, policymakers should not regard them as directly indicative of national targets. Our study shows that to keep global warming to 1.5 °C with at least 50 % probability and limited overshoot, the least-cost greenhouse gas reductions by 2040 for the EU-27, Japan and the United States are around 70 %–100 % relative to 2015 levels (including LULUCF). If the selection of scenarios is limited to those consistent with existing national targets, this range increases substantially to around 85–115 %. For China and India, ranges for both selections of scenarios are similar and around 65 %–80 % and 30 %–80 %, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信