奥地利药物检查服务的利用:一项横断面在线调查。

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Alexandra Karden, Tobias Fragner, Cornelia Feichtinger, Julian Strizek, Daragh T McDermott, Igor Grabovac
{"title":"奥地利药物检查服务的利用:一项横断面在线调查。","authors":"Alexandra Karden, Tobias Fragner, Cornelia Feichtinger, Julian Strizek, Daragh T McDermott, Igor Grabovac","doi":"10.1186/s12954-025-01168-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of psychoactive substances is a key public health issue due to its impact on mental, physical, and social health. Integrated drug checking is a well-known harm reduction and addiction prevention measure and is currently implemented in four federal states in Austria. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of drug checking use among a web-survey sample of people who use drugs (PWUD) in Austria and to examine differences in socio-demographic and substance use characteristics between individuals with and without drug checking experience. In addition, reasons for not using these services are explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis of the Austrian data from the European Web Survey on Drugs (EWSD), a targeted survey conducted between March and May 2021 was performed. Based on reported drug checking experience, the data set was divided into two groups - those with and without drug checking experience - and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this web-survey sample of PWUD (n = 1113), 20.1% reported prior use of a drug checking service in Austria. The groups with drug checking experience (n = 224) and those without (n = 889) differed significantly in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in terms of age, household composition, highest level of education, employment status, region of residence, substance use prevalences and treatment experience. Participants who used cannabis only had significantly less experience with drug checking. No significant differences were found regarding gender and income. While logistic regression analysis showed a significant relationship between sociodemographic predictors and drug checking experience, this relationship was relatively weak. The main reasons for not having used the services yet included a high level of trust in the source of supply (68%), confidence in receiving high quality of substances (64%), and a lack of service availability near the place of residence (62%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate that drug checking services are well-accepted and trusted but not equally accessed by and accessible to all PWUD. Specifically, people who use only cannabis and those residing with parents or in rural or small-town areas access services less. In conclusion, there is considerable potential for expanding the availability and accessibility of drug checking services in Austria, particularly to reach underserved groups of PWUD who could benefit from this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of drug checking services in Austria: a cross-sectional online survey.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Karden, Tobias Fragner, Cornelia Feichtinger, Julian Strizek, Daragh T McDermott, Igor Grabovac\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12954-025-01168-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of psychoactive substances is a key public health issue due to its impact on mental, physical, and social health. Integrated drug checking is a well-known harm reduction and addiction prevention measure and is currently implemented in four federal states in Austria. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of drug checking use among a web-survey sample of people who use drugs (PWUD) in Austria and to examine differences in socio-demographic and substance use characteristics between individuals with and without drug checking experience. In addition, reasons for not using these services are explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis of the Austrian data from the European Web Survey on Drugs (EWSD), a targeted survey conducted between March and May 2021 was performed. Based on reported drug checking experience, the data set was divided into two groups - those with and without drug checking experience - and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this web-survey sample of PWUD (n = 1113), 20.1% reported prior use of a drug checking service in Austria. The groups with drug checking experience (n = 224) and those without (n = 889) differed significantly in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in terms of age, household composition, highest level of education, employment status, region of residence, substance use prevalences and treatment experience. Participants who used cannabis only had significantly less experience with drug checking. No significant differences were found regarding gender and income. While logistic regression analysis showed a significant relationship between sociodemographic predictors and drug checking experience, this relationship was relatively weak. The main reasons for not having used the services yet included a high level of trust in the source of supply (68%), confidence in receiving high quality of substances (64%), and a lack of service availability near the place of residence (62%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate that drug checking services are well-accepted and trusted but not equally accessed by and accessible to all PWUD. Specifically, people who use only cannabis and those residing with parents or in rural or small-town areas access services less. In conclusion, there is considerable potential for expanding the availability and accessibility of drug checking services in Austria, particularly to reach underserved groups of PWUD who could benefit from this intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829356/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01168-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01168-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:精神活性物质的使用对精神、身体和社会健康产生影响,是一个关键的公共卫生问题。综合毒品检查是一项众所周知的减少危害和预防成瘾措施,目前在奥地利四个联邦州实施。本研究的目的是调查在奥地利使用毒品的人(PWUD)的网络调查样本中药物检查使用的流行程度,并检查有和没有药物检查经验的个人之间的社会人口统计学和物质使用特征的差异。此外,还探讨了不使用这些服务的原因。方法:对欧洲药品网络调查(EWSD)的奥地利数据进行二次数据分析,该调查于2021年3月至5月进行。根据报告的药物检查经验,将数据集分为两组-有和没有药物检查经验-并进行比较。结果:在这个网上调查样本的PWUD (n = 1113), 20.1%的报告说,以前使用药物检查服务在奥地利。有药物检查经验组(n = 224)与无药物检查经验组(n = 889)的单因素和多因素分析差异均有统计学意义。单变量分析显示,年龄、家庭组成、最高教育水平、就业状况、居住地区、药物使用流行率和治疗经验方面存在显著差异。使用大麻的参与者在毒品检查方面的经验明显更少。在性别和收入方面没有发现显著差异。logistic回归分析显示,社会人口学预测因子与药物检查经历之间存在显著相关性,但相关性相对较弱。尚未使用服务的主要原因包括对供应来源的高度信任(68%),对获得高质量物质的信心(64%),以及居住地附近缺乏服务(62%)。结论:结果表明,药品检查服务的接受度和信任度较高,但药品检查服务的可及性和可及性不均衡。具体而言,只使用大麻的人以及与父母同住或住在农村或小城镇地区的人获得服务的机会较少。总之,在奥地利,扩大药物检查服务的可得性和可及性具有相当大的潜力,特别是要接触到服务不足的PWUD群体,他们可以从这一干预措施中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of drug checking services in Austria: a cross-sectional online survey.

Background: The use of psychoactive substances is a key public health issue due to its impact on mental, physical, and social health. Integrated drug checking is a well-known harm reduction and addiction prevention measure and is currently implemented in four federal states in Austria. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of drug checking use among a web-survey sample of people who use drugs (PWUD) in Austria and to examine differences in socio-demographic and substance use characteristics between individuals with and without drug checking experience. In addition, reasons for not using these services are explored.

Methods: A secondary data analysis of the Austrian data from the European Web Survey on Drugs (EWSD), a targeted survey conducted between March and May 2021 was performed. Based on reported drug checking experience, the data set was divided into two groups - those with and without drug checking experience - and compared.

Results: In this web-survey sample of PWUD (n = 1113), 20.1% reported prior use of a drug checking service in Austria. The groups with drug checking experience (n = 224) and those without (n = 889) differed significantly in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in terms of age, household composition, highest level of education, employment status, region of residence, substance use prevalences and treatment experience. Participants who used cannabis only had significantly less experience with drug checking. No significant differences were found regarding gender and income. While logistic regression analysis showed a significant relationship between sociodemographic predictors and drug checking experience, this relationship was relatively weak. The main reasons for not having used the services yet included a high level of trust in the source of supply (68%), confidence in receiving high quality of substances (64%), and a lack of service availability near the place of residence (62%).

Conclusions: The results indicate that drug checking services are well-accepted and trusted but not equally accessed by and accessible to all PWUD. Specifically, people who use only cannabis and those residing with parents or in rural or small-town areas access services less. In conclusion, there is considerable potential for expanding the availability and accessibility of drug checking services in Austria, particularly to reach underserved groups of PWUD who could benefit from this intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信