扩张型心肌病患者DBIL/HDLC比值的预后意义

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xinyi Wang, Qiqi Song, Qingqing Zhang, Xinyi Li, Jiaqi Wang, Jiantao Gong, Ziyi Zhang, Ning Tan, Tsang Suk Ying, Wing-tak Wong, Dunliang Ma, Lei Jiang
{"title":"扩张型心肌病患者DBIL/HDLC比值的预后意义","authors":"Xinyi Wang,&nbsp;Qiqi Song,&nbsp;Qingqing Zhang,&nbsp;Xinyi Li,&nbsp;Jiaqi Wang,&nbsp;Jiantao Gong,&nbsp;Ziyi Zhang,&nbsp;Ning Tan,&nbsp;Tsang Suk Ying,&nbsp;Wing-tak Wong,&nbsp;Dunliang Ma,&nbsp;Lei Jiang","doi":"10.1155/cdr/8835736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> In cardiovascular pathology, both direct bilirubin (DBIL) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) have been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, the prognostic significance of these biomarkers in the context of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains unclear. To address this gap, this study conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of the DBIL/HDLC ratio in patients diagnosed with DCM.</p><p><b>Methods and Results:</b> A total of 986 consecutive DCM patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2010 to December 2019 and divided into two groups based on the DBIL/HDLC ratio cut-off value: ≤ 4.45 (<i>n</i> = 483) and &gt; 4.45 (<i>n</i> = 503). Patients with lower DBIL/HDLC (≤ 4.45) experienced lower in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and major adverse clinical events (MACEs) (0.8%, 32.9%, and 12.2%, respectively) compared to those with higher DBIL/HDLC (&gt; 4.45) (6.4%, 59.1%, and 16.7%, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified DBIL/HDLC as an independent risk factor for long-term mortality (odds ratio: 1.026; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005–1.048; <i>p</i> = 0.016) and all-cause mortality over a median follow-up of 67 ± 1.8 months (hazard ratio: 1.011; 95% CI: 1.005–1.018; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed good discrimination for long-term mortality (area under the curve (AUC): 0.675; 95% CI: 0.692–0.708; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a better prognosis for patients with DBIL/HDLC ≤ 4.45 (log-rank <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 40.356, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, the impact of additional variables on the results was investigated by a subgroup analysis.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The DBIL/HDLC ratio could serve as a simple and cost-effective tool for evaluating prognosis in DCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9582,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/cdr/8835736","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prognostic Significance of the DBIL/HDLC Ratio in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy\",\"authors\":\"Xinyi Wang,&nbsp;Qiqi Song,&nbsp;Qingqing Zhang,&nbsp;Xinyi Li,&nbsp;Jiaqi Wang,&nbsp;Jiantao Gong,&nbsp;Ziyi Zhang,&nbsp;Ning Tan,&nbsp;Tsang Suk Ying,&nbsp;Wing-tak Wong,&nbsp;Dunliang Ma,&nbsp;Lei Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/cdr/8835736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> In cardiovascular pathology, both direct bilirubin (DBIL) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) have been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, the prognostic significance of these biomarkers in the context of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains unclear. To address this gap, this study conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of the DBIL/HDLC ratio in patients diagnosed with DCM.</p><p><b>Methods and Results:</b> A total of 986 consecutive DCM patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2010 to December 2019 and divided into two groups based on the DBIL/HDLC ratio cut-off value: ≤ 4.45 (<i>n</i> = 483) and &gt; 4.45 (<i>n</i> = 503). Patients with lower DBIL/HDLC (≤ 4.45) experienced lower in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and major adverse clinical events (MACEs) (0.8%, 32.9%, and 12.2%, respectively) compared to those with higher DBIL/HDLC (&gt; 4.45) (6.4%, 59.1%, and 16.7%, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified DBIL/HDLC as an independent risk factor for long-term mortality (odds ratio: 1.026; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005–1.048; <i>p</i> = 0.016) and all-cause mortality over a median follow-up of 67 ± 1.8 months (hazard ratio: 1.011; 95% CI: 1.005–1.018; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed good discrimination for long-term mortality (area under the curve (AUC): 0.675; 95% CI: 0.692–0.708; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a better prognosis for patients with DBIL/HDLC ≤ 4.45 (log-rank <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 40.356, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, the impact of additional variables on the results was investigated by a subgroup analysis.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The DBIL/HDLC ratio could serve as a simple and cost-effective tool for evaluating prognosis in DCM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/cdr/8835736\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/cdr/8835736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/cdr/8835736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在心血管病理中,直接胆红素(DBIL)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLC)均与不良临床结果相关。然而,这些生物标志物在扩张型心肌病(DCM)中的预后意义尚不清楚。为了弥补这一空白,本研究进行了回顾性分析,以评估DBIL/HDLC比值在诊断为DCM患者中的预后价值。方法与结果:回顾性纳入2010年1月至2019年12月连续986例DCM患者,根据DBIL/HDLC比值临界值分为≤4.45 (n = 483)和>; 4.45 (n = 503)两组。与DBIL/HDLC(≤4.45)较高的患者(分别为6.4%、59.1%和16.7%)相比,DBIL/HDLC较低(≤4.45)的患者的住院死亡率、长期死亡率和主要临床不良事件(mace)较低(分别为0.8%、32.9%和12.2%)。多因素分析表明,DBIL/HDLC是长期死亡的独立危险因素(优势比:1.026;95%置信区间(CI): 1.005-1.048;P = 0.016),全因死亡率中位随访时间为67±1.8个月(风险比:1.011;95% ci: 1.005-1.018;p & lt;0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线对长期死亡率具有较好的判别性(曲线下面积(AUC): 0.675;95% ci: 0.692-0.708;p & lt;0.001)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,DBIL/HDLC≤4.45的患者预后较好(log-rank χ2 = 40.356, p <;0.001)。此外,通过亚组分析调查了其他变量对结果的影响。结论:DBIL/HDLC比值可作为评估DCM预后的一种简便、经济的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Prognostic Significance of the DBIL/HDLC Ratio in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

The Prognostic Significance of the DBIL/HDLC Ratio in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Background: In cardiovascular pathology, both direct bilirubin (DBIL) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) have been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, the prognostic significance of these biomarkers in the context of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains unclear. To address this gap, this study conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of the DBIL/HDLC ratio in patients diagnosed with DCM.

Methods and Results: A total of 986 consecutive DCM patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2010 to December 2019 and divided into two groups based on the DBIL/HDLC ratio cut-off value: ≤ 4.45 (n = 483) and > 4.45 (n = 503). Patients with lower DBIL/HDLC (≤ 4.45) experienced lower in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and major adverse clinical events (MACEs) (0.8%, 32.9%, and 12.2%, respectively) compared to those with higher DBIL/HDLC (> 4.45) (6.4%, 59.1%, and 16.7%, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified DBIL/HDLC as an independent risk factor for long-term mortality (odds ratio: 1.026; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005–1.048; p = 0.016) and all-cause mortality over a median follow-up of 67 ± 1.8 months (hazard ratio: 1.011; 95% CI: 1.005–1.018; p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed good discrimination for long-term mortality (area under the curve (AUC): 0.675; 95% CI: 0.692–0.708; p < 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a better prognosis for patients with DBIL/HDLC ≤ 4.45 (log-rank χ2 = 40.356, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the impact of additional variables on the results was investigated by a subgroup analysis.

Conclusion: The DBIL/HDLC ratio could serve as a simple and cost-effective tool for evaluating prognosis in DCM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Therapeutics 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Therapeutics (formerly Cardiovascular Drug Reviews) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on cardiovascular and clinical pharmacology, as well as clinical trials of new cardiovascular therapies. Articles on translational research, pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, device, gene and cell therapies, and pharmacoepidemiology are also encouraged. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): Acute coronary syndrome Arrhythmias Atherosclerosis Basic cardiac electrophysiology Cardiac catheterization Cardiac remodeling Coagulation and thrombosis Diabetic cardiovascular disease Heart failure (systolic HF, HFrEF, diastolic HF, HFpEF) Hyperlipidemia Hypertension Ischemic heart disease Vascular biology Ventricular assist devices Molecular cardio-biology Myocardial regeneration Lipoprotein metabolism Radial artery access Percutaneous coronary intervention Transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信