从超临界二氧化碳流体中萃取 Lindera neesiana 精油的优化以及与蒸汽萃取和同时蒸馏萃取的比较

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Sajan L. Shyaula, Mandira Ghimire, Sajan Maharjan, Khilendra Gurung
{"title":"从超临界二氧化碳流体中萃取 Lindera neesiana 精油的优化以及与蒸汽萃取和同时蒸馏萃取的比较","authors":"Sajan L. Shyaula,&nbsp;Mandira Ghimire,&nbsp;Sajan Maharjan,&nbsp;Khilendra Gurung","doi":"10.1002/ffj.3835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A study was performed on the fruits of <i>Lindera neesiana</i> (Wall. ex Nees) Kurz essential oil extracted by different methods; steam distillation (SD), simultaneous distillation extraction (SDE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). The operating conditions tested achieved a maximum yield, 11.08% for supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> extraction, 1.03% for steam distillation and 2.53% for solvent distillation. The response surface methodology was used to optimise the experiment. The extractions using supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> were performed at different pressure 131, 140, 163, 185 and 194 bar and at temperatures 41°C to 49°C. The optimised condition for the experiment was the pressure of 162 bar and temperature of 42°C in order to get the maximum extraction yield of about 10.44% of <i>L. neesiana</i> oil. Total 33 compounds were identified in <i>L. neesiana</i> oil from the fruits by GCMS. The constituents of oil extracted by different methods were mostly similar qualitatively whereas the relative proportions of compounds identified were markedly different. In the SFE, the less volatile compounds such as myristicin, elemicin, geranic acid and caryophyllene oxide are predominant whereas, in the SDE and SD process, the high volatile compounds including sulcatone, citral, <i>α</i>-pinene and eucalyptol are principal compounds. This variation in chemical composition suggests diverse potential industrial applications for the essential oils extracted by different methods. The increment of extraction yields upto 11.08% from SFE is an impressive achievement in the plant business.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":170,"journal":{"name":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","volume":"40 2","pages":"267-277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimisation of Essential Oil Extraction of Lindera neesiana From Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Fluid and Comparison to Steam and Simultaneous Distillation Extraction\",\"authors\":\"Sajan L. Shyaula,&nbsp;Mandira Ghimire,&nbsp;Sajan Maharjan,&nbsp;Khilendra Gurung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ffj.3835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>A study was performed on the fruits of <i>Lindera neesiana</i> (Wall. ex Nees) Kurz essential oil extracted by different methods; steam distillation (SD), simultaneous distillation extraction (SDE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). The operating conditions tested achieved a maximum yield, 11.08% for supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> extraction, 1.03% for steam distillation and 2.53% for solvent distillation. The response surface methodology was used to optimise the experiment. The extractions using supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> were performed at different pressure 131, 140, 163, 185 and 194 bar and at temperatures 41°C to 49°C. The optimised condition for the experiment was the pressure of 162 bar and temperature of 42°C in order to get the maximum extraction yield of about 10.44% of <i>L. neesiana</i> oil. Total 33 compounds were identified in <i>L. neesiana</i> oil from the fruits by GCMS. The constituents of oil extracted by different methods were mostly similar qualitatively whereas the relative proportions of compounds identified were markedly different. In the SFE, the less volatile compounds such as myristicin, elemicin, geranic acid and caryophyllene oxide are predominant whereas, in the SDE and SD process, the high volatile compounds including sulcatone, citral, <i>α</i>-pinene and eucalyptol are principal compounds. This variation in chemical composition suggests diverse potential industrial applications for the essential oils extracted by different methods. The increment of extraction yields upto 11.08% from SFE is an impressive achievement in the plant business.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flavour and Fragrance Journal\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"267-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flavour and Fragrance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffj.3835\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flavour and Fragrance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffj.3835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员采用蒸汽蒸馏(SD)、同步蒸馏萃取(SDE)和超临界流体萃取(SFE)等不同方法萃取 Lindera neesiana (Wall. ex Nees) Kurz 果实的精油。在测试的操作条件下,超临界二氧化碳萃取法的最高产率为 11.08%,蒸汽蒸馏法为 1.03%,溶剂蒸馏法为 2.53%。实验采用响应面方法进行优化。使用超临界二氧化碳进行萃取的压力分别为 131、140、163、185 和 194 巴,温度为 41°C 至 49°C。实验的最佳条件是压力为 162 巴,温度为 42°C,以获得最高的萃取率(约 10.44%)。通过气相色谱法(GCMS)从果实中鉴定出了 33 种 L. neesiana 油中的化合物。不同方法萃取的油的成分在质量上基本相似,但鉴定出的化合物的相对比例却明显不同。在 SFE 法中,肉豆蔻苷、榄香素、香叶酸和氧化香叶烯等挥发性较低的化合物占主导地位,而在 SDE 和 SD 法中,高挥发性化合物(包括舒尔卡酮、柠檬醛、α-蒎烯和桉叶油醇)则是主要化合物。化学成分的这种变化表明,用不同方法萃取的精油具有多种潜在的工业用途。SFE 的萃取率提高到 11.08%,这在植物行业中是一个令人印象深刻的成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimisation of Essential Oil Extraction of Lindera neesiana From Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Fluid and Comparison to Steam and Simultaneous Distillation Extraction

A study was performed on the fruits of Lindera neesiana (Wall. ex Nees) Kurz essential oil extracted by different methods; steam distillation (SD), simultaneous distillation extraction (SDE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). The operating conditions tested achieved a maximum yield, 11.08% for supercritical CO2 extraction, 1.03% for steam distillation and 2.53% for solvent distillation. The response surface methodology was used to optimise the experiment. The extractions using supercritical CO2 were performed at different pressure 131, 140, 163, 185 and 194 bar and at temperatures 41°C to 49°C. The optimised condition for the experiment was the pressure of 162 bar and temperature of 42°C in order to get the maximum extraction yield of about 10.44% of L. neesiana oil. Total 33 compounds were identified in L. neesiana oil from the fruits by GCMS. The constituents of oil extracted by different methods were mostly similar qualitatively whereas the relative proportions of compounds identified were markedly different. In the SFE, the less volatile compounds such as myristicin, elemicin, geranic acid and caryophyllene oxide are predominant whereas, in the SDE and SD process, the high volatile compounds including sulcatone, citral, α-pinene and eucalyptol are principal compounds. This variation in chemical composition suggests diverse potential industrial applications for the essential oils extracted by different methods. The increment of extraction yields upto 11.08% from SFE is an impressive achievement in the plant business.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Flavour and Fragrance Journal
Flavour and Fragrance Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
40
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Flavour and Fragrance Journal publishes original research articles, reviews and special reports on all aspects of flavour and fragrance. Its high scientific standards and international character is ensured by a strict refereeing system and an editorial team representing the multidisciplinary expertise of our field of research. Because analysis is the matter of many submissions and supports the data used in many other domains, a special attention is placed on the quality of analytical techniques. All natural or synthetic products eliciting or influencing a sensory stimulus related to gustation or olfaction are eligible for publication in the Journal. Eligible as well are the techniques related to their preparation, characterization and safety. This notably involves analytical and sensory analysis, physical chemistry, modeling, microbiology – antimicrobial properties, biology, chemosensory perception and legislation. The overall aim is to produce a journal of the highest quality which provides a scientific forum for academia as well as for industry on all aspects of flavors, fragrances and related materials, and which is valued by readers and contributors alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信