加速电动汽车革命:收费补贴和环保税的政策含义

IF 2.1 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Sanchari Guha Niyogi
{"title":"加速电动汽车革命:收费补贴和环保税的政策含义","authors":"Sanchari Guha Niyogi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtl.2025.100152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) are central to global efforts to reduce transportation emissions, yet limited charging infrastructure remains a primary barrier to widespread adoption. Governments worldwide have implemented various subsidies for EV purchasers and manufacturers, alongside green tax schemes, to incentivise infrastructure expansion and boost EV uptake. This research explores the efficacy of policy combinations — specifically purchase-based or per-station subsidies and green taxes — in a duopolistic market setting. By employing a game-theoretic model comprising profit-maximising EV and gasoline vehicle (GV) manufacturers, a population of utility-maximising consumers, and a social welfare-maximising government, we observe that a purchase-based subsidy in combination with a green tax provides a win–win–win outcome for the government and the manufacturers. Incorporating consumers’ EV-related anxieties, our analysis suggests that a green tax, either on its own or combined with subsidies, is the most effective policy for governments aiming to maximise social welfare. In markets characterised by diverse and sometimes misinformed consumers, a policy mix of green taxes and charging subsidies proves especially beneficial when the environmental impact of EV adoption is substantial. Additionally, when accounting for network effects, which could result in congested charging stations, pairing consumer subsidies with a green tax emerges as the preferential policy. Manufacturers and policymakers are provided with multifaceted insights that aid in conceptualising electric mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45871,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerating the electric vehicle revolution: Policy implications of charging subsidies and green taxes\",\"authors\":\"Sanchari Guha Niyogi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejtl.2025.100152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) are central to global efforts to reduce transportation emissions, yet limited charging infrastructure remains a primary barrier to widespread adoption. Governments worldwide have implemented various subsidies for EV purchasers and manufacturers, alongside green tax schemes, to incentivise infrastructure expansion and boost EV uptake. This research explores the efficacy of policy combinations — specifically purchase-based or per-station subsidies and green taxes — in a duopolistic market setting. By employing a game-theoretic model comprising profit-maximising EV and gasoline vehicle (GV) manufacturers, a population of utility-maximising consumers, and a social welfare-maximising government, we observe that a purchase-based subsidy in combination with a green tax provides a win–win–win outcome for the government and the manufacturers. Incorporating consumers’ EV-related anxieties, our analysis suggests that a green tax, either on its own or combined with subsidies, is the most effective policy for governments aiming to maximise social welfare. In markets characterised by diverse and sometimes misinformed consumers, a policy mix of green taxes and charging subsidies proves especially beneficial when the environmental impact of EV adoption is substantial. Additionally, when accounting for network effects, which could result in congested charging stations, pairing consumer subsidies with a green tax emerges as the preferential policy. Manufacturers and policymakers are provided with multifaceted insights that aid in conceptualising electric mobility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2192437625000019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2192437625000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电动汽车(ev)是全球减少交通排放努力的核心,但有限的充电基础设施仍然是广泛采用电动汽车的主要障碍。世界各国政府已经对电动汽车购买者和制造商实施了各种补贴,以及绿色税收计划,以激励基础设施扩建,促进电动汽车的普及。本研究探讨了在双寡头市场环境下政策组合的有效性,特别是基于购买或每站补贴和绿色税。通过采用一个由利润最大化的电动汽车和汽油车制造商、效用最大化的消费者群体和社会福利最大化的政府组成的博弈论模型,我们观察到基于购买的补贴与绿色税相结合为政府和制造商提供了一个三赢的结果。考虑到消费者对电动汽车的担忧,我们的分析表明,绿色税,无论是单独征收还是与补贴相结合,都是旨在实现社会福利最大化的政府最有效的政策。在消费者多样化、有时被误导的市场中,当采用电动汽车对环境产生重大影响时,绿色税和充电补贴的政策组合被证明特别有益。此外,考虑到可能导致充电站拥挤的网络效应,将消费者补贴与环保税结合起来就成为了优惠政策。为制造商和政策制定者提供了多方面的见解,有助于概念化电动汽车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accelerating the electric vehicle revolution: Policy implications of charging subsidies and green taxes
Electric vehicles (EVs) are central to global efforts to reduce transportation emissions, yet limited charging infrastructure remains a primary barrier to widespread adoption. Governments worldwide have implemented various subsidies for EV purchasers and manufacturers, alongside green tax schemes, to incentivise infrastructure expansion and boost EV uptake. This research explores the efficacy of policy combinations — specifically purchase-based or per-station subsidies and green taxes — in a duopolistic market setting. By employing a game-theoretic model comprising profit-maximising EV and gasoline vehicle (GV) manufacturers, a population of utility-maximising consumers, and a social welfare-maximising government, we observe that a purchase-based subsidy in combination with a green tax provides a win–win–win outcome for the government and the manufacturers. Incorporating consumers’ EV-related anxieties, our analysis suggests that a green tax, either on its own or combined with subsidies, is the most effective policy for governments aiming to maximise social welfare. In markets characterised by diverse and sometimes misinformed consumers, a policy mix of green taxes and charging subsidies proves especially beneficial when the environmental impact of EV adoption is substantial. Additionally, when accounting for network effects, which could result in congested charging stations, pairing consumer subsidies with a green tax emerges as the preferential policy. Manufacturers and policymakers are provided with multifaceted insights that aid in conceptualising electric mobility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
129 days
期刊介绍: The EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics promotes the use of mathematics in general, and operations research in particular, in the context of transportation and logistics. It is a forum for the presentation of original mathematical models, methodologies and computational results, focussing on advanced applications in transportation and logistics. The journal publishes two types of document: (i) research articles and (ii) tutorials. A research article presents original methodological contributions to the field (e.g. new mathematical models, new algorithms, new simulation techniques). A tutorial provides an introduction to an advanced topic, designed to ease the use of the relevant methodology by researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信