{"title":"设计和报告幼儿数学干预中护理人员培训的最佳做法","authors":"Mackenna Vander Tuin , Gena Nelson , Lois Ndungu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Caregivers are essential to children's growth and development and are now being recognized as important stakeholders in academic interventions (e.g., mathematics). Although researchers are making strides to involve caregivers in implementing interventions, there is still work to be done to improve the overall study reporting related to the development and implementation of caregiver training. We developed a coding rubric based on the Division for Early Childhood (DEC; 2016) Recommended Practices and current literature to examine the quality of information reported about caregiver training across seven domains. In this systematic review, we identified 51 research studies (48 research articles) published between 1982 and 2023 that focused on early childhood mathematics interventions with the involvement of a caregiver. Overall, findings suggest that the identified studies could improve their reporting and/or practices in all domains of caregiver training (i.e., evidence-based training content, family partnerships, delivery, environment, cultural competence, materials, fidelity). We provide recommendations for future research teams to consider when developing, implementing, and reporting on caregiver training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 69-79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practices for designing and reporting caregiver training in early childhood mathematics interventions\",\"authors\":\"Mackenna Vander Tuin , Gena Nelson , Lois Ndungu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Caregivers are essential to children's growth and development and are now being recognized as important stakeholders in academic interventions (e.g., mathematics). Although researchers are making strides to involve caregivers in implementing interventions, there is still work to be done to improve the overall study reporting related to the development and implementation of caregiver training. We developed a coding rubric based on the Division for Early Childhood (DEC; 2016) Recommended Practices and current literature to examine the quality of information reported about caregiver training across seven domains. In this systematic review, we identified 51 research studies (48 research articles) published between 1982 and 2023 that focused on early childhood mathematics interventions with the involvement of a caregiver. Overall, findings suggest that the identified studies could improve their reporting and/or practices in all domains of caregiver training (i.e., evidence-based training content, family partnerships, delivery, environment, cultural competence, materials, fidelity). We provide recommendations for future research teams to consider when developing, implementing, and reporting on caregiver training.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000146\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Best practices for designing and reporting caregiver training in early childhood mathematics interventions
Caregivers are essential to children's growth and development and are now being recognized as important stakeholders in academic interventions (e.g., mathematics). Although researchers are making strides to involve caregivers in implementing interventions, there is still work to be done to improve the overall study reporting related to the development and implementation of caregiver training. We developed a coding rubric based on the Division for Early Childhood (DEC; 2016) Recommended Practices and current literature to examine the quality of information reported about caregiver training across seven domains. In this systematic review, we identified 51 research studies (48 research articles) published between 1982 and 2023 that focused on early childhood mathematics interventions with the involvement of a caregiver. Overall, findings suggest that the identified studies could improve their reporting and/or practices in all domains of caregiver training (i.e., evidence-based training content, family partnerships, delivery, environment, cultural competence, materials, fidelity). We provide recommendations for future research teams to consider when developing, implementing, and reporting on caregiver training.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.