设计和报告幼儿数学干预中护理人员培训的最佳做法

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mackenna Vander Tuin , Gena Nelson , Lois Ndungu
{"title":"设计和报告幼儿数学干预中护理人员培训的最佳做法","authors":"Mackenna Vander Tuin ,&nbsp;Gena Nelson ,&nbsp;Lois Ndungu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Caregivers are essential to children's growth and development and are now being recognized as important stakeholders in academic interventions (e.g., mathematics). Although researchers are making strides to involve caregivers in implementing interventions, there is still work to be done to improve the overall study reporting related to the development and implementation of caregiver training. We developed a coding rubric based on the Division for Early Childhood (DEC; 2016) Recommended Practices and current literature to examine the quality of information reported about caregiver training across seven domains. In this systematic review, we identified 51 research studies (48 research articles) published between 1982 and 2023 that focused on early childhood mathematics interventions with the involvement of a caregiver. Overall, findings suggest that the identified studies could improve their reporting and/or practices in all domains of caregiver training (i.e., evidence-based training content, family partnerships, delivery, environment, cultural competence, materials, fidelity). We provide recommendations for future research teams to consider when developing, implementing, and reporting on caregiver training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 69-79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practices for designing and reporting caregiver training in early childhood mathematics interventions\",\"authors\":\"Mackenna Vander Tuin ,&nbsp;Gena Nelson ,&nbsp;Lois Ndungu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Caregivers are essential to children's growth and development and are now being recognized as important stakeholders in academic interventions (e.g., mathematics). Although researchers are making strides to involve caregivers in implementing interventions, there is still work to be done to improve the overall study reporting related to the development and implementation of caregiver training. We developed a coding rubric based on the Division for Early Childhood (DEC; 2016) Recommended Practices and current literature to examine the quality of information reported about caregiver training across seven domains. In this systematic review, we identified 51 research studies (48 research articles) published between 1982 and 2023 that focused on early childhood mathematics interventions with the involvement of a caregiver. Overall, findings suggest that the identified studies could improve their reporting and/or practices in all domains of caregiver training (i.e., evidence-based training content, family partnerships, delivery, environment, cultural competence, materials, fidelity). We provide recommendations for future research teams to consider when developing, implementing, and reporting on caregiver training.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000146\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

照顾者对儿童的成长和发展至关重要,现在被认为是学术干预(例如数学)的重要利益攸关方。尽管研究人员在让护理人员参与实施干预措施方面取得了长足进步,但仍有工作要做,以改善与护理人员培训的发展和实施相关的整体研究报告。我们根据幼儿部(DEC;2016)推荐的做法和当前的文献,以检查七个领域的护理人员培训报告的信息质量。在本系统综述中,我们确定了1982年至2023年间发表的51项研究(48篇研究文章),这些研究集中在照顾者参与的幼儿数学干预方面。总体而言,研究结果表明,确定的研究可以在护理人员培训的所有领域(即基于证据的培训内容、家庭伙伴关系、交付、环境、文化能力、材料、忠诚度)改进其报告和/或实践。我们为未来的研究团队在制定、实施和报告护理人员培训时提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best practices for designing and reporting caregiver training in early childhood mathematics interventions
Caregivers are essential to children's growth and development and are now being recognized as important stakeholders in academic interventions (e.g., mathematics). Although researchers are making strides to involve caregivers in implementing interventions, there is still work to be done to improve the overall study reporting related to the development and implementation of caregiver training. We developed a coding rubric based on the Division for Early Childhood (DEC; 2016) Recommended Practices and current literature to examine the quality of information reported about caregiver training across seven domains. In this systematic review, we identified 51 research studies (48 research articles) published between 1982 and 2023 that focused on early childhood mathematics interventions with the involvement of a caregiver. Overall, findings suggest that the identified studies could improve their reporting and/or practices in all domains of caregiver training (i.e., evidence-based training content, family partnerships, delivery, environment, cultural competence, materials, fidelity). We provide recommendations for future research teams to consider when developing, implementing, and reporting on caregiver training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信