MiNa量表:评估自然中的正念及其对幼儿心理健康、福祉和整体发展的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Agathi Argyriadi, Alexandros Argyriadis, Emmanuel Kopanakis, Panagiotis Koutras, Isabel Vieira, Olga Drakopoulou, Konstantinos Louvaris, Zoi Mammi, Dimitra Katsarou, Panagiotis Paoullis
{"title":"MiNa量表:评估自然中的正念及其对幼儿心理健康、福祉和整体发展的影响。","authors":"Agathi Argyriadi, Alexandros Argyriadis, Emmanuel Kopanakis, Panagiotis Koutras, Isabel Vieira, Olga Drakopoulou, Konstantinos Louvaris, Zoi Mammi, Dimitra Katsarou, Panagiotis Paoullis","doi":"10.36740/Merkur202406104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>. Aim: The aim of this study was to design, validate, and assess the effectiveness of the MiNa scale in measuring mindfulness and its impact on young students' mental health and holistic development, with a focus on diverse educational needs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: This study utilized a mixed-methods approach to validate the MiNa Questionnaire. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted on a sample of 224 students from Greece and Cyprus, who completed the questionnaire. Psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, were also assessed using standard statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: EFA revealed a three-factor structure explaining 53% of the variance, with strong factor loadings and reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.7). CFA further confirmed the model fit, with RMSEA = 0.03, CFI = 0.97, and SRMR = 0.08. The results indicated significant improvements in students that attended mindfulness interventional programs, especially on their emotional regulation, and cognitive focus. It is important to note that positive results were predominantly observed among the sample of students characterized by vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: The MiNa Questionnaire has proven to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing mindfulness in students from diverse educational backgrounds. Its adaptability for students with disabilities, combined with its cultural inclusivity, makes it a valuable resource for educators seeking to implement mindfulness programs in varied educational contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":39518,"journal":{"name":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","volume":"52 6","pages":"638-646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MiNa scale: Assessing mindfulness in nature and its impact on the mental health, wellbeing and holistic development of young children.\",\"authors\":\"Agathi Argyriadi, Alexandros Argyriadis, Emmanuel Kopanakis, Panagiotis Koutras, Isabel Vieira, Olga Drakopoulou, Konstantinos Louvaris, Zoi Mammi, Dimitra Katsarou, Panagiotis Paoullis\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/Merkur202406104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>. Aim: The aim of this study was to design, validate, and assess the effectiveness of the MiNa scale in measuring mindfulness and its impact on young students' mental health and holistic development, with a focus on diverse educational needs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: This study utilized a mixed-methods approach to validate the MiNa Questionnaire. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted on a sample of 224 students from Greece and Cyprus, who completed the questionnaire. Psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, were also assessed using standard statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: EFA revealed a three-factor structure explaining 53% of the variance, with strong factor loadings and reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.7). CFA further confirmed the model fit, with RMSEA = 0.03, CFI = 0.97, and SRMR = 0.08. The results indicated significant improvements in students that attended mindfulness interventional programs, especially on their emotional regulation, and cognitive focus. It is important to note that positive results were predominantly observed among the sample of students characterized by vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: The MiNa Questionnaire has proven to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing mindfulness in students from diverse educational backgrounds. Its adaptability for students with disabilities, combined with its cultural inclusivity, makes it a valuable resource for educators seeking to implement mindfulness programs in varied educational contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"638-646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202406104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202406104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:。目的:本研究旨在设计、验证和评估MiNa量表在测量正念的有效性及其对年轻学生心理健康和整体发展的影响,重点关注不同的教育需求。患者和方法:材料和方法:本研究采用混合方法验证MiNa问卷。对来自希腊和塞浦路斯的224名学生进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA),他们完成了问卷调查。心理测量特性,包括信度和效度,也使用标准统计方法进行评估。结果:EFA揭示了一个三因素结构,解释了53%的方差,具有很强的因素负荷和可靠性(Cronbach's α > 0.7)。CFA进一步证实了模型的拟合,RMSEA = 0.03, CFI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.08。结果表明,参加正念干预项目的学生在情绪调节和认知焦点方面有显著改善。值得注意的是,在以脆弱为特征的学生样本中,主要观察到积极的结果。结论:MiNa问卷已被证明是评估不同教育背景学生正念的可靠和有效的工具。它对残疾学生的适应性,加上它的文化包容性,使它成为教育工作者在各种教育环境中实施正念课程的宝贵资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MiNa scale: Assessing mindfulness in nature and its impact on the mental health, wellbeing and holistic development of young children.

Objective: . Aim: The aim of this study was to design, validate, and assess the effectiveness of the MiNa scale in measuring mindfulness and its impact on young students' mental health and holistic development, with a focus on diverse educational needs.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: This study utilized a mixed-methods approach to validate the MiNa Questionnaire. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted on a sample of 224 students from Greece and Cyprus, who completed the questionnaire. Psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, were also assessed using standard statistical methods.

Results: Results: EFA revealed a three-factor structure explaining 53% of the variance, with strong factor loadings and reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.7). CFA further confirmed the model fit, with RMSEA = 0.03, CFI = 0.97, and SRMR = 0.08. The results indicated significant improvements in students that attended mindfulness interventional programs, especially on their emotional regulation, and cognitive focus. It is important to note that positive results were predominantly observed among the sample of students characterized by vulnerability.

Conclusion: Conclusions: The MiNa Questionnaire has proven to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing mindfulness in students from diverse educational backgrounds. Its adaptability for students with disabilities, combined with its cultural inclusivity, makes it a valuable resource for educators seeking to implement mindfulness programs in varied educational contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信