Joanna M Roy, Basel Musmar, Matthews Lan, Shyam Majmundar, Cheritesh Amaravadi, Sarah Winiker, Charles Morse, Erica Sais, Shray Patel, Kareem El Naamani, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal M Jabbour
{"title":"显微外科夹持术治疗老年患者颅内动脉瘤:结果与年轻患者相当。","authors":"Joanna M Roy, Basel Musmar, Matthews Lan, Shyam Majmundar, Cheritesh Amaravadi, Sarah Winiker, Charles Morse, Erica Sais, Shray Patel, Kareem El Naamani, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal M Jabbour","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS242494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years, there has been a shift toward the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, particularly among elderly patients, that is, those aged 70 years and older. However, microsurgical clipping remains the preferred modality for aneurysms of a certain morphology and location. The authors of this study aimed to compare the outcomes of clipping on the basis of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center study of patients who had undergone microsurgical clipping of an intracranial aneurysm between February 2016 and November 2022. Propensity scores were estimated using the 1:2 nearest neighbor method. Outcomes of interest were intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge (NHD), functional dependence on discharge, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 50 patients older than 70 years were matched with 100 patients younger than 70 years of age. Aneurysm location, morphology, and rupture status were comparable between the matched cohorts. There was no significant difference in complications (14.0% for age ≥ 70 vs 13.0% for age < 70, p > 0.99), extended LOS (30% vs 19%, respectively, p = 0.129), NHD (38.0% vs 26.0%, respectively, p = 0.131), functional dependence on discharge (22% vs 17%, respectively, p = 0.509), or mortality (8.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, p = 0.077).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results demonstrated rates of complications, LOS, NHD, functional dependence, and mortality in elderly patients comparable to those in younger patients. The authors acknowledge the importance of patient selection and encourage further studies to assess the safety of clipping in the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microsurgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: outcomes comparable to those in younger cohorts.\",\"authors\":\"Joanna M Roy, Basel Musmar, Matthews Lan, Shyam Majmundar, Cheritesh Amaravadi, Sarah Winiker, Charles Morse, Erica Sais, Shray Patel, Kareem El Naamani, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal M Jabbour\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.10.JNS242494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years, there has been a shift toward the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, particularly among elderly patients, that is, those aged 70 years and older. However, microsurgical clipping remains the preferred modality for aneurysms of a certain morphology and location. The authors of this study aimed to compare the outcomes of clipping on the basis of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center study of patients who had undergone microsurgical clipping of an intracranial aneurysm between February 2016 and November 2022. Propensity scores were estimated using the 1:2 nearest neighbor method. Outcomes of interest were intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge (NHD), functional dependence on discharge, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 50 patients older than 70 years were matched with 100 patients younger than 70 years of age. Aneurysm location, morphology, and rupture status were comparable between the matched cohorts. There was no significant difference in complications (14.0% for age ≥ 70 vs 13.0% for age < 70, p > 0.99), extended LOS (30% vs 19%, respectively, p = 0.129), NHD (38.0% vs 26.0%, respectively, p = 0.131), functional dependence on discharge (22% vs 17%, respectively, p = 0.509), or mortality (8.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, p = 0.077).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results demonstrated rates of complications, LOS, NHD, functional dependence, and mortality in elderly patients comparable to those in younger patients. The authors acknowledge the importance of patient selection and encourage further studies to assess the safety of clipping in the elderly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS242494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS242494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:近年来,颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗逐渐转向,特别是在老年患者中,即70岁及以上的患者。然而,对于特定形态和位置的动脉瘤,显微外科夹闭仍然是首选的方式。这项研究的作者旨在比较基于年龄的修剪的结果。方法:这是一项回顾性的单中心研究,研究对象是2016年2月至2022年11月期间接受显微手术夹闭颅内动脉瘤的患者。倾向得分采用1:2最近邻法估计。关注的结果是术中和术后并发症、住院时间(LOS)、非家庭出院(NHD)、出院后的功能依赖和死亡率。结果:倾向评分匹配后,50例70岁以上患者与100例70岁以下患者匹配。动脉瘤位置、形态和破裂状态在匹配队列之间具有可比性。并发症(≥70岁14.0% vs < 70岁13.0%,p = 0.99)、延长LOS(分别为30% vs 19%, p = 0.129)、NHD(分别为38.0% vs 26.0%, p = 0.131)、出院功能依赖(分别为22% vs 17%, p = 0.509)或死亡率(分别为8.0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.077)方面无显著差异。结论:研究结果表明,老年患者的并发症、LOS、NHD、功能依赖和死亡率与年轻患者相当。作者承认患者选择的重要性,并鼓励进一步的研究来评估老年人夹夹的安全性。
Microsurgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: outcomes comparable to those in younger cohorts.
Objective: In recent years, there has been a shift toward the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, particularly among elderly patients, that is, those aged 70 years and older. However, microsurgical clipping remains the preferred modality for aneurysms of a certain morphology and location. The authors of this study aimed to compare the outcomes of clipping on the basis of age.
Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study of patients who had undergone microsurgical clipping of an intracranial aneurysm between February 2016 and November 2022. Propensity scores were estimated using the 1:2 nearest neighbor method. Outcomes of interest were intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge (NHD), functional dependence on discharge, and mortality.
Results: After propensity score matching, 50 patients older than 70 years were matched with 100 patients younger than 70 years of age. Aneurysm location, morphology, and rupture status were comparable between the matched cohorts. There was no significant difference in complications (14.0% for age ≥ 70 vs 13.0% for age < 70, p > 0.99), extended LOS (30% vs 19%, respectively, p = 0.129), NHD (38.0% vs 26.0%, respectively, p = 0.131), functional dependence on discharge (22% vs 17%, respectively, p = 0.509), or mortality (8.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, p = 0.077).
Conclusions: The study results demonstrated rates of complications, LOS, NHD, functional dependence, and mortality in elderly patients comparable to those in younger patients. The authors acknowledge the importance of patient selection and encourage further studies to assess the safety of clipping in the elderly.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.