长期条件下处方持续时间的变化:使用OpenPrescribing的英国NHS初级保健队列研究。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-26 Print Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0326
Brian MacKenna, Andrew D Brown, Richard Croker, Alex J Walker, Ben Goldacre, Apostolos Tsiachristas, Dave Evans, Peter Inglesby, Seb Bacon, Helen J Curtis
{"title":"长期条件下处方持续时间的变化:使用OpenPrescribing的英国NHS初级保健队列研究。","authors":"Brian MacKenna, Andrew D Brown, Richard Croker, Alex J Walker, Ben Goldacre, Apostolos Tsiachristas, Dave Evans, Peter Inglesby, Seb Bacon, Helen J Curtis","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients receive repeat prescriptions for routine medications used to treat chronic conditions. Doctors typically issue repeat prescriptions with durations ranging from 28 to 84 days. There is currently no national guidance in England for the optimal prescription duration for routine medications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate current prescription durations for five common routine medications in England; explore and visualise geographical variation; and identify practice factors that are associated with shorter prescribing duration to inform policy making.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of NHS primary care prescribing data in England from December 2018 to November 2019.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The prescription duration was analysed for five common routine medications in England; ramipril, atorvastatin, simvastatin, levothyroxine, and amlodipine. Variation was assessed between regional clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), and practice factors associated with different durations were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the common medications included, 28-day prescriptions accounted for 48.5% (2.5 billion) tablets/capsules issued, while 43.6% were issued for 56 days. There was very wide regional variation (7.2%-95.0%) in the proportion of 28-day prescriptions issued by CCGs. Practice dispensing status was the most likely predictor of prescription duration; dispensing practices had a higher 28-day prescribing proportion than non-dispensing practices. The proportion of patients with chronic conditions and the electronic health record system used by a practice were also associated with prescription duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis of OpenPrescribing data showed that repeat prescriptions of 28 days are common for patients taking routine medications for chronic conditions, particularly in dispensing practices. This provides data to inform the policy debate on current practice. Configuration of electronic health record systems offer an opportunity to implement and evaluate new policies on repeat prescription duration in England.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e448-e456"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in duration of repeat prescriptions: a primary care cohort study in England.\",\"authors\":\"Brian MacKenna, Andrew D Brown, Richard Croker, Alex J Walker, Ben Goldacre, Apostolos Tsiachristas, Dave Evans, Peter Inglesby, Seb Bacon, Helen J Curtis\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients receive repeat prescriptions for routine medications used to treat chronic conditions. Doctors typically issue repeat prescriptions with durations ranging from 28 to 84 days. There is currently no national guidance in England for the optimal prescription duration for routine medications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate current prescription durations for five common routine medications in England; explore and visualise geographical variation; and identify practice factors that are associated with shorter prescribing duration to inform policy making.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of NHS primary care prescribing data in England from December 2018 to November 2019.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The prescription duration was analysed for five common routine medications in England; ramipril, atorvastatin, simvastatin, levothyroxine, and amlodipine. Variation was assessed between regional clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), and practice factors associated with different durations were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the common medications included, 28-day prescriptions accounted for 48.5% (2.5 billion) tablets/capsules issued, while 43.6% were issued for 56 days. There was very wide regional variation (7.2%-95.0%) in the proportion of 28-day prescriptions issued by CCGs. Practice dispensing status was the most likely predictor of prescription duration; dispensing practices had a higher 28-day prescribing proportion than non-dispensing practices. The proportion of patients with chronic conditions and the electronic health record system used by a practice were also associated with prescription duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis of OpenPrescribing data showed that repeat prescriptions of 28 days are common for patients taking routine medications for chronic conditions, particularly in dispensing practices. This provides data to inform the policy debate on current practice. Configuration of electronic health record systems offer an opportunity to implement and evaluate new policies on repeat prescription duration in England.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e448-e456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236966/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多患者接受常规药物治疗长期疾病(LTCs)。医生通常会在一到三个月的时间里重复开处方,但英国目前没有关于最佳时间的全国性指导。目的:描述当前英格兰常见LTCs的处方持续时间,探索和可视化地理差异,并确定与较短处方持续时间相关的实践因素,为政策制定提供信息。设计与设置2018年12月- 2019年11月英国全科医生处方数据的回顾性队列研究方法:计算英国常见LTCs的处方持续时间,包括雷米普利、阿托伐他汀、辛伐他汀、左旋甲状腺素和氨氯地平。我们评估了区域临床调试组(ccg)之间的差异水平,并确定了与不同持续时间相关的实践因素。结果:纳入的常用药物中,28天(1个月)处方占48.5%(25亿粒),56天(2个月)处方占43.6%。28天处方比例的区域差异非常大(7.2% ~ 95.0%)。实践配药状态是最可能的预测处方持续时间。LTCs患者的比例和诊所使用的电子健康记录软件也与处方持续时间有关。结论:一个月的处方持续时间是常见的患者服用常规药物长期条件,特别是在配药实践。在英国,电子健康记录配置为实施和评估关于重复处方持续时间的新政策提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Variation in duration of repeat prescriptions: a primary care cohort study in England.

Variation in duration of repeat prescriptions: a primary care cohort study in England.

Variation in duration of repeat prescriptions: a primary care cohort study in England.

Background: Many patients receive repeat prescriptions for routine medications used to treat chronic conditions. Doctors typically issue repeat prescriptions with durations ranging from 28 to 84 days. There is currently no national guidance in England for the optimal prescription duration for routine medications.

Aim: To evaluate current prescription durations for five common routine medications in England; explore and visualise geographical variation; and identify practice factors that are associated with shorter prescribing duration to inform policy making.

Design and setting: A retrospective cohort study of NHS primary care prescribing data in England from December 2018 to November 2019.

Method: The prescription duration was analysed for five common routine medications in England; ramipril, atorvastatin, simvastatin, levothyroxine, and amlodipine. Variation was assessed between regional clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), and practice factors associated with different durations were identified.

Results: Of the common medications included, 28-day prescriptions accounted for 48.5% (2.5 billion) tablets/capsules issued, while 43.6% were issued for 56 days. There was very wide regional variation (7.2%-95.0%) in the proportion of 28-day prescriptions issued by CCGs. Practice dispensing status was the most likely predictor of prescription duration; dispensing practices had a higher 28-day prescribing proportion than non-dispensing practices. The proportion of patients with chronic conditions and the electronic health record system used by a practice were also associated with prescription duration.

Conclusion: This analysis of OpenPrescribing data showed that repeat prescriptions of 28 days are common for patients taking routine medications for chronic conditions, particularly in dispensing practices. This provides data to inform the policy debate on current practice. Configuration of electronic health record systems offer an opportunity to implement and evaluate new policies on repeat prescription duration in England.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信