{"title":"食道神经内分泌癌监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中治疗方法与生存率的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"T Yang, P Yang, H Li, M Sun, J Zhang, Y Li, B Zhu","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is an uncommon and highly aggressive tumor with an obscure etiology. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the best treatment option for patients with ENEC. This study identified patients with ENEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1975 and 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and prognostic factors were determined through Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess five-year overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into a combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy group and a surgery group based on treatment modality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. A total of 604 participants were included; univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that ENEC patients with localized or regional disease had significantly higher survival rates (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.51, P < 0.001 and HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71, P < 0.001) than those with distant metastases. The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (HR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.25-0.46, P < 0.001) and surgical treatment (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.59, P < 0.001) significantly improved survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS among treatments (P < 0.0001), with the combination therapy and surgery groups having similar rates of 7.04% and 8.77%, respectively, and outperforming other methods. The combination therapy group maintained the best survival rate over time. The synergistic application of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has markedly enhanced the five-year survival rate of patients with ENEC, offering invaluable insights for clinical management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of treatment methods and survival in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma population of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"T Yang, P Yang, H Li, M Sun, J Zhang, Y Li, B Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doaf008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is an uncommon and highly aggressive tumor with an obscure etiology. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the best treatment option for patients with ENEC. This study identified patients with ENEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1975 and 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and prognostic factors were determined through Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess five-year overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into a combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy group and a surgery group based on treatment modality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. A total of 604 participants were included; univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that ENEC patients with localized or regional disease had significantly higher survival rates (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.51, P < 0.001 and HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71, P < 0.001) than those with distant metastases. The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (HR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.25-0.46, P < 0.001) and surgical treatment (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.59, P < 0.001) significantly improved survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS among treatments (P < 0.0001), with the combination therapy and surgery groups having similar rates of 7.04% and 8.77%, respectively, and outperforming other methods. The combination therapy group maintained the best survival rate over time. The synergistic application of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has markedly enhanced the five-year survival rate of patients with ENEC, offering invaluable insights for clinical management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要食道神经内分泌癌(ENEC)是一种罕见且侵袭性强的肿瘤,病因不明。因此,本研究旨在探讨ENEC患者的最佳治疗方案。该研究从1975年至2021年的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定了ENEC患者。采用描述性统计分析临床病理特征,采用Cox回归分析确定预后因素。Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估5年总生存期(OS)。根据治疗方式将患者分为放化疗联合组和手术组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡两组之间的基线特征。共纳入604名参与者;单因素和多因素分析表明,伴有局部或区域性疾病的ENEC患者的生存率明显更高(HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.51, P
Association of treatment methods and survival in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma population of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: a retrospective cohort study.
Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is an uncommon and highly aggressive tumor with an obscure etiology. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the best treatment option for patients with ENEC. This study identified patients with ENEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1975 and 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and prognostic factors were determined through Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess five-year overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into a combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy group and a surgery group based on treatment modality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. A total of 604 participants were included; univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that ENEC patients with localized or regional disease had significantly higher survival rates (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.51, P < 0.001 and HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71, P < 0.001) than those with distant metastases. The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (HR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.25-0.46, P < 0.001) and surgical treatment (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.59, P < 0.001) significantly improved survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS among treatments (P < 0.0001), with the combination therapy and surgery groups having similar rates of 7.04% and 8.77%, respectively, and outperforming other methods. The combination therapy group maintained the best survival rate over time. The synergistic application of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has markedly enhanced the five-year survival rate of patients with ENEC, offering invaluable insights for clinical management strategies.