出售私募股权拥有的医师实践和医师更替。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Victoria Berquist, Lev Klarnet, Leemore Dafny
{"title":"出售私募股权拥有的医师实践和医师更替。","authors":"Victoria Berquist, Lev Klarnet, Leemore Dafny","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Private equity (PE) acquisition of physician practices is increasing, with owners targeting sales, or exits, in 3 to 7 years. Little is known about the association of exit with physician retention and subsequent employment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether PE exit of physician practices is associated with changes in physician retention and subsequent choice of practice size.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Using data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File from December 31, 2014, to December 31, 2020, this case-control study compared employment changes for physicians at PE-exiting practices sold between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018 (treatment group), with employment changes for matched control physicians in practices not sold by PE owners but with the same specialty, hospital referral region, practice size, and time period. Physicians billing fee-for-service Medicare during the study period were eligible for inclusion. A difference-in-differences design was used to compare retention between the treatment and control groups in the 2 years before and after exit using a multinomial logit model that adjusted for physician decade of graduation. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2023, to November 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Exit of a PE-owned physician practice.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Physician employment outcomes included staying (continuing to bill through the initial practice), working elsewhere (only billing through other practices), and retirement (no longer billing). Whether a physician left to a join large (>120-physician) practice was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1215 physicians included in the analysis (405 at 70 PE-exiting practices and 810 matched controls; 814 [67.0%] male and 401 (33.0%) were female. Physicians in all PE-exiting practices were typically in practices of more than 20 physicians (471 [65.2%]) and often in the South (373 [51.7%]). Dermatology was the leading specialty (216 [29.9%]), followed by family medicine (94 [13.0%]). Physicians employed in PE-exiting practices were 16.5 (95% CI, 10.6-22.3) percentage points less likely to continue working in that practice 2 years after exit compared with matched controls. There was no significant change in the probability of retirement (0 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 4.0). Physicians in PE-exiting practices were 10.1 (95% CI, 6.5 to 13.7) percentage points likelier than matched controls to join a large practice of more than 120 physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this case-control study, PE exit was followed by an increase in physician turnover and subsequent employment at a large (>120-physician) practice relative to matched controls, notwithstanding similar turnover rates between these physicians and matched controls prior to exit. The increase in physician turnover and consolidation following PE exits has important implications for patients, physicians, investors, and physician markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 2","pages":"e245376"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sale of Private Equity-Owned Physician Practices and Physician Turnover.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Berquist, Lev Klarnet, Leemore Dafny\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Private equity (PE) acquisition of physician practices is increasing, with owners targeting sales, or exits, in 3 to 7 years. Little is known about the association of exit with physician retention and subsequent employment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether PE exit of physician practices is associated with changes in physician retention and subsequent choice of practice size.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Using data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File from December 31, 2014, to December 31, 2020, this case-control study compared employment changes for physicians at PE-exiting practices sold between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018 (treatment group), with employment changes for matched control physicians in practices not sold by PE owners but with the same specialty, hospital referral region, practice size, and time period. Physicians billing fee-for-service Medicare during the study period were eligible for inclusion. A difference-in-differences design was used to compare retention between the treatment and control groups in the 2 years before and after exit using a multinomial logit model that adjusted for physician decade of graduation. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2023, to November 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Exit of a PE-owned physician practice.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Physician employment outcomes included staying (continuing to bill through the initial practice), working elsewhere (only billing through other practices), and retirement (no longer billing). Whether a physician left to a join large (>120-physician) practice was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1215 physicians included in the analysis (405 at 70 PE-exiting practices and 810 matched controls; 814 [67.0%] male and 401 (33.0%) were female. Physicians in all PE-exiting practices were typically in practices of more than 20 physicians (471 [65.2%]) and often in the South (373 [51.7%]). Dermatology was the leading specialty (216 [29.9%]), followed by family medicine (94 [13.0%]). Physicians employed in PE-exiting practices were 16.5 (95% CI, 10.6-22.3) percentage points less likely to continue working in that practice 2 years after exit compared with matched controls. There was no significant change in the probability of retirement (0 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 4.0). Physicians in PE-exiting practices were 10.1 (95% CI, 6.5 to 13.7) percentage points likelier than matched controls to join a large practice of more than 120 physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this case-control study, PE exit was followed by an increase in physician turnover and subsequent employment at a large (>120-physician) practice relative to matched controls, notwithstanding similar turnover rates between these physicians and matched controls prior to exit. The increase in physician turnover and consolidation following PE exits has important implications for patients, physicians, investors, and physician markets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"e245376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829224/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:私募股权(PE)对医生诊所的收购正在增加,所有者的目标是在3到7年内出售或退出。很少有人知道退出与医生保留和随后的就业的关系。目的:研究PE退出医师执业是否与医师保留和后续执业规模选择的变化有关。设计、设置和参与者:使用2014年12月31日至2020年12月31日的医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医生和临床医生国家可下载文件的数据,本病例对照研究比较了2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日(治疗组)出售PE退出诊所的医生的就业变化,以及非PE所有者出售但具有相同专业、医院转诊区域、诊所规模和时间段的匹配对照医生的就业变化。在研究期间,按服务收费的医疗保险医生符合纳入条件。采用双差设计比较治疗组和对照组在离职前后2年的保留情况,采用多项logit模型调整医师毕业年限。数据分析时间为2023年8月1日至2024年11月9日。暴露:pe拥有的医师执业的退出。主要结果和措施:医生就业结果包括留下来(继续通过初始诊所计费),在其他地方工作(仅通过其他诊所计费)和退休(不再计费)。是否医生离开加入大(bbb120医生)的做法也进行了评估。结果:在纳入分析的1215名医生中(405名来自70家pe退出诊所,810名匹配对照;男性814例(67.0%),女性401例(33.0%)。所有pe退出诊所的医生通常在超过20名医生的诊所工作(471名[65.2%]),通常在南方(373名[51.7%])。皮肤科占首位(216例[29.9%]),家庭医学次之(94例[13.0%])。与匹配的对照组相比,在pe退出诊所工作的医生在退出该诊所2年后继续工作的可能性降低了16.5个百分点(95% CI, 10.6-22.3)。退休概率没有显著变化(0个百分点;95% CI, -4.1至4.0)。在pe退出实践中的医生加入超过120名医生的大型实践的可能性比匹配对照高10.1个百分点(95% CI, 6.5至13.7)。结论和相关性:在本病例对照研究中,PE退出后,相对于匹配的对照组,在大型(bbb120名医生)诊所工作的医生流动率增加,尽管这些医生和匹配的对照组在退出前的流动率相似。私募股权退出后,医生更替和整合的增加对患者、医生、投资者和医生市场都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sale of Private Equity-Owned Physician Practices and Physician Turnover.

Importance: Private equity (PE) acquisition of physician practices is increasing, with owners targeting sales, or exits, in 3 to 7 years. Little is known about the association of exit with physician retention and subsequent employment.

Objective: To examine whether PE exit of physician practices is associated with changes in physician retention and subsequent choice of practice size.

Design, setting, and participants: Using data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File from December 31, 2014, to December 31, 2020, this case-control study compared employment changes for physicians at PE-exiting practices sold between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018 (treatment group), with employment changes for matched control physicians in practices not sold by PE owners but with the same specialty, hospital referral region, practice size, and time period. Physicians billing fee-for-service Medicare during the study period were eligible for inclusion. A difference-in-differences design was used to compare retention between the treatment and control groups in the 2 years before and after exit using a multinomial logit model that adjusted for physician decade of graduation. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2023, to November 9, 2024.

Exposure: Exit of a PE-owned physician practice.

Main outcomes and measures: Physician employment outcomes included staying (continuing to bill through the initial practice), working elsewhere (only billing through other practices), and retirement (no longer billing). Whether a physician left to a join large (>120-physician) practice was also evaluated.

Results: Of the 1215 physicians included in the analysis (405 at 70 PE-exiting practices and 810 matched controls; 814 [67.0%] male and 401 (33.0%) were female. Physicians in all PE-exiting practices were typically in practices of more than 20 physicians (471 [65.2%]) and often in the South (373 [51.7%]). Dermatology was the leading specialty (216 [29.9%]), followed by family medicine (94 [13.0%]). Physicians employed in PE-exiting practices were 16.5 (95% CI, 10.6-22.3) percentage points less likely to continue working in that practice 2 years after exit compared with matched controls. There was no significant change in the probability of retirement (0 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 4.0). Physicians in PE-exiting practices were 10.1 (95% CI, 6.5 to 13.7) percentage points likelier than matched controls to join a large practice of more than 120 physicians.

Conclusions and relevance: In this case-control study, PE exit was followed by an increase in physician turnover and subsequent employment at a large (>120-physician) practice relative to matched controls, notwithstanding similar turnover rates between these physicians and matched controls prior to exit. The increase in physician turnover and consolidation following PE exits has important implications for patients, physicians, investors, and physician markets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信