与他人一起独立:团队科学博士后给人类学带来的启示。

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sonia Rupcic, Lily N Shapiro, Aaron Seaman, Gemmae M Fix
{"title":"与他人一起独立:团队科学博士后给人类学带来的启示。","authors":"Sonia Rupcic, Lily N Shapiro, Aaron Seaman, Gemmae M Fix","doi":"10.1080/00187259.2024.2417197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite critiques from inside the discipline of anthropology, the figure of the \"lone wolf\" anthropologist perdures in the ways sociocultural doctoral students are (and are not) trained. Failure to prepare graduates to engage in substantive interdisciplinary collaboration poorly prepares them for careers inside and outside academia, and limits their capacity to meaningfully apply their research to pressing problems of the day. An increasing share of graduates occupy precarious postdoctoral positions in the humanities and social sciences; these are temporary posts from which they might continue to conduct research in precarity and relative isolation. To the extent that they are acknowledged at all, postdocs are worried over as signs of the crisis in academic hiring. Certain postdoctoral positions, however, can offer training in \"team science,\" research conducted by interdisciplinary teams whose members meaningfully work together to apply for funding, design a research protocol, collect data, analyze data, and publish and present findings. Drawing on our own experiences, we propose taking the \"fellowship\" in \"postdoctoral fellowship\" as an epistemological challenge to anthropology to produce knowledge in the company of others.</p>","PeriodicalId":47620,"journal":{"name":"Human Organization","volume":"83 4","pages":"413-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independence with others: Lessons for anthropology from postdocs in team science.\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Rupcic, Lily N Shapiro, Aaron Seaman, Gemmae M Fix\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00187259.2024.2417197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite critiques from inside the discipline of anthropology, the figure of the \\\"lone wolf\\\" anthropologist perdures in the ways sociocultural doctoral students are (and are not) trained. Failure to prepare graduates to engage in substantive interdisciplinary collaboration poorly prepares them for careers inside and outside academia, and limits their capacity to meaningfully apply their research to pressing problems of the day. An increasing share of graduates occupy precarious postdoctoral positions in the humanities and social sciences; these are temporary posts from which they might continue to conduct research in precarity and relative isolation. To the extent that they are acknowledged at all, postdocs are worried over as signs of the crisis in academic hiring. Certain postdoctoral positions, however, can offer training in \\\"team science,\\\" research conducted by interdisciplinary teams whose members meaningfully work together to apply for funding, design a research protocol, collect data, analyze data, and publish and present findings. Drawing on our own experiences, we propose taking the \\\"fellowship\\\" in \\\"postdoctoral fellowship\\\" as an epistemological challenge to anthropology to produce knowledge in the company of others.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Organization\",\"volume\":\"83 4\",\"pages\":\"413-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823433/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00187259.2024.2417197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00187259.2024.2417197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人类学学科内部提出了批评,但 "独狼 "人类学家的形象在社会文化学博士生的培养方式中依然存在。如果不能培养毕业生参与实质性的跨学科合作,他们就不能很好地为学术界内外的职业生涯做好准备,也限制了他们将研究成果有意义地应用于解决当今紧迫问题的能力。越来越多的毕业生在人文和社会科学领域担任不稳定的博士后职位;这些职位都是临时性的,他们可以在这些职位上继续从事不稳定和相对孤立的研究工作。博士后职位即使得到承认,也会被视为学术界招聘危机的标志而备受担忧。然而,某些博士后职位可以提供 "团队科学 "方面的培训,即由跨学科团队开展的研究,其成员通过有意义的合作来申请经费、设计研究方案、收集数据、分析数据、发表和展示研究结果。根据我们自身的经验,我们建议将 "博士后研究金 "中的 "研究金 "作为人类学在认识论上的一项挑战,即与他人一起创造知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independence with others: Lessons for anthropology from postdocs in team science.

Despite critiques from inside the discipline of anthropology, the figure of the "lone wolf" anthropologist perdures in the ways sociocultural doctoral students are (and are not) trained. Failure to prepare graduates to engage in substantive interdisciplinary collaboration poorly prepares them for careers inside and outside academia, and limits their capacity to meaningfully apply their research to pressing problems of the day. An increasing share of graduates occupy precarious postdoctoral positions in the humanities and social sciences; these are temporary posts from which they might continue to conduct research in precarity and relative isolation. To the extent that they are acknowledged at all, postdocs are worried over as signs of the crisis in academic hiring. Certain postdoctoral positions, however, can offer training in "team science," research conducted by interdisciplinary teams whose members meaningfully work together to apply for funding, design a research protocol, collect data, analyze data, and publish and present findings. Drawing on our own experiences, we propose taking the "fellowship" in "postdoctoral fellowship" as an epistemological challenge to anthropology to produce knowledge in the company of others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Organization
Human Organization Multiple-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信