2016 - 2022年中国大陆皮肤科药物临床试验变化的叙述性回顾

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Beibei Zhu, Jing Li, Qi Ni, Shuo Yang, Zheng Yin, Xueyuan Yang
{"title":"2016 - 2022年中国大陆皮肤科药物临床试验变化的叙述性回顾","authors":"Beibei Zhu, Jing Li, Qi Ni, Shuo Yang, Zheng Yin, Xueyuan Yang","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00743-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Policy reforms in drug regulation and reimbursement have encouraged drug research and development in China. However, there is a lack of insights on industry trends for dermatology research. We aim to describe trends and features of clinical trials for dermatology drugs in China, understand recent achievements, and forecast development trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical trial records posted on the Registration and Information Disclosure Platform of Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) were screened. All trials for dermatological drugs, posted on platform between 2016 and 2022 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1172 trial records were identified, among which studies for skin infection, immune-mediated and inflammatory skin disease (IMIDs) and skin malignancy accounted for 48.9% (n = 573), 42.0% (n = 492) and 9.1% (n = 107), respectively. Most trials focused on generic drugs (n = 728, 62.1%). Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) accounted for less than 6% of all trials. The number of trials on dermatology drugs increased sharply from 2016 to 2018 followed by a decline, which is mainly driven by the drop in bioequivalence evaluation (BE) studies for generic drugs indicated for skin infection. A growing trend in the number of trials for innovative drugs was observed. After removing duplicated drugs based on generic name, a total of 607 tested dermatology drugs were identified among which 51.9% were indicated for IMIDs. The number of innovative drugs exceeded generic drugs from 2020 to 2022. The geographic distribution of lead sites (the site where the principal investigator being employed) was uneven, with most of them located in east China. Of 1,068 trials sponsored by Chinese firms, most were BE (n = 692, 64.8%) and generic drugs (n = 722, 67.6%), while among 104 trials sponsored by multinational corporations (MNC), a majority were phase III (n = 53, 51.0%) trials and focused on innovative drugs (n = 94, 90.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrated positive consequences of reforms in the healthcare industry in China. Nevertheless, long-term policies are expected to enhance the innovative capabilities of Chinese pharmaceutical companies while ensuring accessible and affordable drug supply with generics, encourage early participation in global drug R&D activities to shorten \"drug lag\", and promote investment in innovative drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"450-461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Clinical Trials of Dermatological Drugs in Mainland China Between 2016 and 2022: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Beibei Zhu, Jing Li, Qi Ni, Shuo Yang, Zheng Yin, Xueyuan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-025-00743-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Policy reforms in drug regulation and reimbursement have encouraged drug research and development in China. However, there is a lack of insights on industry trends for dermatology research. We aim to describe trends and features of clinical trials for dermatology drugs in China, understand recent achievements, and forecast development trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical trial records posted on the Registration and Information Disclosure Platform of Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) were screened. All trials for dermatological drugs, posted on platform between 2016 and 2022 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1172 trial records were identified, among which studies for skin infection, immune-mediated and inflammatory skin disease (IMIDs) and skin malignancy accounted for 48.9% (n = 573), 42.0% (n = 492) and 9.1% (n = 107), respectively. Most trials focused on generic drugs (n = 728, 62.1%). Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) accounted for less than 6% of all trials. The number of trials on dermatology drugs increased sharply from 2016 to 2018 followed by a decline, which is mainly driven by the drop in bioequivalence evaluation (BE) studies for generic drugs indicated for skin infection. A growing trend in the number of trials for innovative drugs was observed. After removing duplicated drugs based on generic name, a total of 607 tested dermatology drugs were identified among which 51.9% were indicated for IMIDs. The number of innovative drugs exceeded generic drugs from 2020 to 2022. The geographic distribution of lead sites (the site where the principal investigator being employed) was uneven, with most of them located in east China. Of 1,068 trials sponsored by Chinese firms, most were BE (n = 692, 64.8%) and generic drugs (n = 722, 67.6%), while among 104 trials sponsored by multinational corporations (MNC), a majority were phase III (n = 53, 51.0%) trials and focused on innovative drugs (n = 94, 90.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrated positive consequences of reforms in the healthcare industry in China. Nevertheless, long-term policies are expected to enhance the innovative capabilities of Chinese pharmaceutical companies while ensuring accessible and affordable drug supply with generics, encourage early participation in global drug R&D activities to shorten \\\"drug lag\\\", and promote investment in innovative drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"450-461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00743-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00743-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:药品监管和报销方面的政策改革鼓励了中国的药物研发。然而,缺乏对皮肤学研究的行业趋势的见解。我们的目标是描述中国皮肤科药物临床试验的趋势和特点,了解最近的成果,并预测发展趋势。方法:对药品审评中心注册信息公开平台上发布的临床试验记录进行筛选。2016年至2022年期间发布在平台上的所有皮肤病药物试验都被纳入其中。结果:共纳入1172项试验记录,其中皮肤感染研究占48.9% (n = 573),免疫介导性和炎症性皮肤病(IMIDs)研究占42.0% (n = 492),皮肤恶性肿瘤研究占9.1% (n = 107)。大多数试验集中在仿制药上(n = 728, 62.1%)。多区域临床试验(mrct)占所有试验的不到6%。2016年至2018年,皮肤科药物试验数量急剧增加,随后下降,这主要是由于针对皮肤感染的仿制药的生物等效性评价(BE)研究减少。观察到创新药物试验的数量呈增长趋势。剔除仿制名重复用药后,共鉴定出607种皮肤科药物,其中51.9%为IMIDs适应症。2020年至2022年,创新药数量超过仿制药。主要研究点(聘请首席研究员的研究点)的地理分布不均匀,大部分位于华东地区。在中国企业赞助的1068项试验中,以BE (n = 692, 64.8%)和仿制药(n = 722, 67.6%)为主,而在跨国公司(MNC)赞助的104项试验中,以III期试验(n = 53, 51.0%)为主,以创新药为主(n = 94, 90.4%)。结论:研究结果显示了中国医疗保健行业改革的积极影响。然而,长期政策有望提高中国制药企业的创新能力,同时确保仿制药的可及性和可负担性,鼓励早期参与全球药物研发活动,缩短“药物滞后”,并促进对创新药物的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Clinical Trials of Dermatological Drugs in Mainland China Between 2016 and 2022: A Narrative Review.

Introduction: Policy reforms in drug regulation and reimbursement have encouraged drug research and development in China. However, there is a lack of insights on industry trends for dermatology research. We aim to describe trends and features of clinical trials for dermatology drugs in China, understand recent achievements, and forecast development trends.

Methods: Clinical trial records posted on the Registration and Information Disclosure Platform of Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) were screened. All trials for dermatological drugs, posted on platform between 2016 and 2022 were included.

Results: A total of 1172 trial records were identified, among which studies for skin infection, immune-mediated and inflammatory skin disease (IMIDs) and skin malignancy accounted for 48.9% (n = 573), 42.0% (n = 492) and 9.1% (n = 107), respectively. Most trials focused on generic drugs (n = 728, 62.1%). Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) accounted for less than 6% of all trials. The number of trials on dermatology drugs increased sharply from 2016 to 2018 followed by a decline, which is mainly driven by the drop in bioequivalence evaluation (BE) studies for generic drugs indicated for skin infection. A growing trend in the number of trials for innovative drugs was observed. After removing duplicated drugs based on generic name, a total of 607 tested dermatology drugs were identified among which 51.9% were indicated for IMIDs. The number of innovative drugs exceeded generic drugs from 2020 to 2022. The geographic distribution of lead sites (the site where the principal investigator being employed) was uneven, with most of them located in east China. Of 1,068 trials sponsored by Chinese firms, most were BE (n = 692, 64.8%) and generic drugs (n = 722, 67.6%), while among 104 trials sponsored by multinational corporations (MNC), a majority were phase III (n = 53, 51.0%) trials and focused on innovative drugs (n = 94, 90.4%).

Conclusion: Findings demonstrated positive consequences of reforms in the healthcare industry in China. Nevertheless, long-term policies are expected to enhance the innovative capabilities of Chinese pharmaceutical companies while ensuring accessible and affordable drug supply with generics, encourage early participation in global drug R&D activities to shorten "drug lag", and promote investment in innovative drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信