如何系统地确定精神药物的治疗参考范围?AGNP TDM工作队的建议。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1097/FTD.0000000000001264
Xenia M Hart, Friederike Amann, Pierre Baumann, Ursula Havemann-Reinecke, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Werner Steimer, Stefan Unterecker, Gerald Zernig, Gerhard Gründer, Christoph Hiemke
{"title":"如何系统地确定精神药物的治疗参考范围?AGNP TDM工作队的建议。","authors":"Xenia M Hart, Friederike Amann, Pierre Baumann, Ursula Havemann-Reinecke, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Werner Steimer, Stefan Unterecker, Gerald Zernig, Gerhard Gründer, Christoph Hiemke","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for controlling pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic variations and for optimizing pharmacotherapy. However, its value is often underestimated because of nonsystematic recommendations for target ranges in the literature. The purpose of this study was to emphasize transparency and systematization in the forthcoming Updates to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP)-TDM Consensus Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, a stepwise method for determining therapeutic reference ranges (TRRs) in psychiatry is introduced. By using various data types, a multidimensional approach for establishing a range is presented. The data types were classified based on how effectively they supported the target ranges. This method was demonstrated for 3 drugs commonly used in psychiatry (aripiprazole, olanzapine, and escitalopram).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the methodological shortcomings in published concentration-effect studies, the approach used here enabled the determination of reference ranges by combining multiple types of data. The lower limit of the TRR is ideally derived from studies that link blood drug concentrations to clinical effectiveness, particularly symptom-specific responses, after fixed-dose treatment. The upper limit depends on the concentrations associated with adverse reactions or maximal response. Thresholds can be estimated using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Preliminary thresholds were derived from responder concentration data or from expected drug concentrations under approved doses. Positron emission tomography studies were used to further validate these ranges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposed a new standard for determining the TRR of psychotropic drugs, thereby enhancing their clinical utility and validity. Adjusting blood levels to these ranges should improve response rates and medication tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"199-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Determine a Therapeutic Reference Range for a Psychotropic Drug Systematically? Recommendations of the TDM Task Force of the AGNP.\",\"authors\":\"Xenia M Hart, Friederike Amann, Pierre Baumann, Ursula Havemann-Reinecke, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Werner Steimer, Stefan Unterecker, Gerald Zernig, Gerhard Gründer, Christoph Hiemke\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for controlling pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic variations and for optimizing pharmacotherapy. However, its value is often underestimated because of nonsystematic recommendations for target ranges in the literature. The purpose of this study was to emphasize transparency and systematization in the forthcoming Updates to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP)-TDM Consensus Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, a stepwise method for determining therapeutic reference ranges (TRRs) in psychiatry is introduced. By using various data types, a multidimensional approach for establishing a range is presented. The data types were classified based on how effectively they supported the target ranges. This method was demonstrated for 3 drugs commonly used in psychiatry (aripiprazole, olanzapine, and escitalopram).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the methodological shortcomings in published concentration-effect studies, the approach used here enabled the determination of reference ranges by combining multiple types of data. The lower limit of the TRR is ideally derived from studies that link blood drug concentrations to clinical effectiveness, particularly symptom-specific responses, after fixed-dose treatment. The upper limit depends on the concentrations associated with adverse reactions or maximal response. Thresholds can be estimated using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Preliminary thresholds were derived from responder concentration data or from expected drug concentrations under approved doses. Positron emission tomography studies were used to further validate these ranges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposed a new standard for determining the TRR of psychotropic drugs, thereby enhancing their clinical utility and validity. Adjusting blood levels to these ranges should improve response rates and medication tolerance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"199-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001264\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:治疗性药物监测(TDM)对于控制药物遗传和药代动力学变化以及优化药物治疗至关重要。然而,由于文献中对目标范围的非系统推荐,其价值往往被低估。本研究的目的是强调即将发布的《神经精神药理学和药物精神病学(AGNP)-TDM共识指南》更新的透明度和系统性。方法:本文介绍一种逐步确定精神病学治疗参考范围(TRRs)的方法。通过使用多种数据类型,提出了一种多维范围建立方法。根据数据类型对目标范围的支持程度对其进行分类。对精神病学常用的3种药物(阿立哌唑、奥氮平和艾司西酞普兰)进行了验证。结果:尽管已发表的浓度效应研究存在方法学上的缺陷,但本文使用的方法可以通过结合多种类型的数据来确定参考范围。理想情况下,TRR的下限来源于将血药浓度与临床疗效,特别是固定剂量治疗后的症状特异性反应联系起来的研究。上限取决于与不良反应或最大反应相关的浓度。阈值可以使用接收机工作特性分析来估计。初步阈值来自应答者浓度数据或批准剂量下的预期药物浓度。正电子发射断层扫描研究用于进一步验证这些范围。结论:本研究为精神药物TRR的测定提供了新的标准,提高了精神药物的临床有效性。将血药浓度调整到这些范围应能提高反应率和药物耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Determine a Therapeutic Reference Range for a Psychotropic Drug Systematically? Recommendations of the TDM Task Force of the AGNP.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for controlling pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic variations and for optimizing pharmacotherapy. However, its value is often underestimated because of nonsystematic recommendations for target ranges in the literature. The purpose of this study was to emphasize transparency and systematization in the forthcoming Updates to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP)-TDM Consensus Guidelines.

Methods: Here, a stepwise method for determining therapeutic reference ranges (TRRs) in psychiatry is introduced. By using various data types, a multidimensional approach for establishing a range is presented. The data types were classified based on how effectively they supported the target ranges. This method was demonstrated for 3 drugs commonly used in psychiatry (aripiprazole, olanzapine, and escitalopram).

Results: Despite the methodological shortcomings in published concentration-effect studies, the approach used here enabled the determination of reference ranges by combining multiple types of data. The lower limit of the TRR is ideally derived from studies that link blood drug concentrations to clinical effectiveness, particularly symptom-specific responses, after fixed-dose treatment. The upper limit depends on the concentrations associated with adverse reactions or maximal response. Thresholds can be estimated using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Preliminary thresholds were derived from responder concentration data or from expected drug concentrations under approved doses. Positron emission tomography studies were used to further validate these ranges.

Conclusions: This study proposed a new standard for determining the TRR of psychotropic drugs, thereby enhancing their clinical utility and validity. Adjusting blood levels to these ranges should improve response rates and medication tolerance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信