Derrick F Campbell, Mansoor Alameri, Felicity Macahilig-Rice, Sean E Witkin, Nancy G Hellman
{"title":"修订后的美国物理治疗协会物理治疗师临床表现工具3.0的验证。","authors":"Derrick F Campbell, Mansoor Alameri, Felicity Macahilig-Rice, Sean E Witkin, Nancy G Hellman","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Validation of the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI 3.0) is essential to ensure that we are effectively assessing Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' clinical performance. The purpose was to validate the revised PT CPI 3.0 for use with DPT students as a measure of clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive and exploratory combined cross-sectional retrospective and prospective cohort design was used. University DPT students' clinical education experiences were explored. Participants were selected using a convenience sample of 693 DPT students from 1 US multicampus DPT program(s) during Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 clinical education experiences. DPT students on (1) integrated (ICE) and (2) 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II) participated in the study. Clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students at midterm and final assessments during clinical education experiences were investigated. Descriptive and inferential statistics evaluated differences between clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students during clinical education experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PT CPI 3.0 demonstrated good internal reliability, and factor analysis with a 1-factor solution explained 81.3% of variance. Construct validity was supported by significant differences in PT CPI item scores between DPT students on ICE and each of TCE I and TCE II. Construct and convergent validity were supported by significant score increases from midterm to final assessments for DPT students on ICE and TCEs and by moderate to large correlations between prior clinical experiences and remaining didactic coursework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings support validity of the revised PT CPI 3.0 as a measure of clinical performance. A limitation is that this study did not assess rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study provides preliminary support for validation of the newly revised APTA PT CPI 3.0 as a measure to assess entry-level physical therapist student clinical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Revised American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0.\",\"authors\":\"Derrick F Campbell, Mansoor Alameri, Felicity Macahilig-Rice, Sean E Witkin, Nancy G Hellman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzaf015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Validation of the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI 3.0) is essential to ensure that we are effectively assessing Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' clinical performance. The purpose was to validate the revised PT CPI 3.0 for use with DPT students as a measure of clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive and exploratory combined cross-sectional retrospective and prospective cohort design was used. University DPT students' clinical education experiences were explored. Participants were selected using a convenience sample of 693 DPT students from 1 US multicampus DPT program(s) during Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 clinical education experiences. DPT students on (1) integrated (ICE) and (2) 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II) participated in the study. Clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students at midterm and final assessments during clinical education experiences were investigated. Descriptive and inferential statistics evaluated differences between clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students during clinical education experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PT CPI 3.0 demonstrated good internal reliability, and factor analysis with a 1-factor solution explained 81.3% of variance. Construct validity was supported by significant differences in PT CPI item scores between DPT students on ICE and each of TCE I and TCE II. Construct and convergent validity were supported by significant score increases from midterm to final assessments for DPT students on ICE and TCEs and by moderate to large correlations between prior clinical experiences and remaining didactic coursework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings support validity of the revised PT CPI 3.0 as a measure of clinical performance. A limitation is that this study did not assess rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study provides preliminary support for validation of the newly revised APTA PT CPI 3.0 as a measure to assess entry-level physical therapist student clinical performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the Revised American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0.
Objective: Validation of the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI 3.0) is essential to ensure that we are effectively assessing Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' clinical performance. The purpose was to validate the revised PT CPI 3.0 for use with DPT students as a measure of clinical performance.
Methods: A descriptive and exploratory combined cross-sectional retrospective and prospective cohort design was used. University DPT students' clinical education experiences were explored. Participants were selected using a convenience sample of 693 DPT students from 1 US multicampus DPT program(s) during Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 clinical education experiences. DPT students on (1) integrated (ICE) and (2) 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II) participated in the study. Clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students at midterm and final assessments during clinical education experiences were investigated. Descriptive and inferential statistics evaluated differences between clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students during clinical education experiences.
Results: The PT CPI 3.0 demonstrated good internal reliability, and factor analysis with a 1-factor solution explained 81.3% of variance. Construct validity was supported by significant differences in PT CPI item scores between DPT students on ICE and each of TCE I and TCE II. Construct and convergent validity were supported by significant score increases from midterm to final assessments for DPT students on ICE and TCEs and by moderate to large correlations between prior clinical experiences and remaining didactic coursework.
Conclusion: Findings support validity of the revised PT CPI 3.0 as a measure of clinical performance. A limitation is that this study did not assess rater reliability.
Impact: This study provides preliminary support for validation of the newly revised APTA PT CPI 3.0 as a measure to assess entry-level physical therapist student clinical performance.
期刊介绍：
Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
