{"title":"医院人工智能/机器学习采用邻里剥夺。","authors":"Jie Chen, Alice Shijia Yan","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the variation in artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) adoption across different hospital characteristics and explore how AI/ML is utilized, particularly in relation to neighborhood deprivation.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>AI/ML-assisted care coordination has the potential to reduce health disparities, but there is a lack of empirical evidence on AI's impact on health equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used linked datasets from the 2022 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and the 2023 American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement. The data were further linked to the 2022 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) for each hospital's service area. State fixed-effect regressions were employed. A decomposition model was also used to quantify predictors of AI/ML implementation, comparing hospitals in higher versus lower ADI areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospitals serving the most vulnerable areas (ADI Q4) were significantly less likely to apply ML or other predictive models (coef = -0.10, P = 0.01) and provided fewer AI/ML-related workforce applications (coef = -0.40, P = 0.01), compared with those in the least vulnerable areas. Decomposition results showed that our model specifications explained 79% of the variation in AI/ML adoption between hospitals in ADI Q4 versus ADI Q1-Q3. In addition, Accountable Care Organization affiliation accounted for 12%-25% of differences in AI/ML utilization across various measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The underuse of AI/ML in economically disadvantaged and rural areas, particularly in workforce management and electronic health record implementation, suggests that these communities may not fully benefit from advancements in AI-enabled health care. Our results further indicate that value-based payment models could be strategically used to support AI integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 3","pages":"227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Adoption by Neighborhood Deprivation.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Chen, Alice Shijia Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the variation in artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) adoption across different hospital characteristics and explore how AI/ML is utilized, particularly in relation to neighborhood deprivation.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>AI/ML-assisted care coordination has the potential to reduce health disparities, but there is a lack of empirical evidence on AI's impact on health equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used linked datasets from the 2022 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and the 2023 American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement. The data were further linked to the 2022 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) for each hospital's service area. State fixed-effect regressions were employed. A decomposition model was also used to quantify predictors of AI/ML implementation, comparing hospitals in higher versus lower ADI areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospitals serving the most vulnerable areas (ADI Q4) were significantly less likely to apply ML or other predictive models (coef = -0.10, P = 0.01) and provided fewer AI/ML-related workforce applications (coef = -0.40, P = 0.01), compared with those in the least vulnerable areas. Decomposition results showed that our model specifications explained 79% of the variation in AI/ML adoption between hospitals in ADI Q4 versus ADI Q1-Q3. In addition, Accountable Care Organization affiliation accounted for 12%-25% of differences in AI/ML utilization across various measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The underuse of AI/ML in economically disadvantaged and rural areas, particularly in workforce management and electronic health record implementation, suggests that these communities may not fully benefit from advancements in AI-enabled health care. Our results further indicate that value-based payment models could be strategically used to support AI integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"227-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809723/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002110\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:了解人工智能/机器学习(AI/ML)在不同医院特点中的应用差异,并探讨如何利用AI/ML,特别是在邻里剥夺方面。背景:人工智能/机器学习辅助护理协调有可能减少健康差距,但缺乏人工智能对卫生公平影响的经验证据。方法:我们使用来自2022年美国医院协会年度调查和2023年美国医院协会信息技术补充的关联数据集。这些数据进一步与每家医院服务区域的2022年地区剥夺指数(ADI)联系起来。采用状态固定效应回归。还使用分解模型来量化人工智能/机器学习实施的预测因素,比较ADI较高和较低地区的医院。结果:与最脆弱地区的医院相比,服务于最脆弱地区的医院(ADI Q4)应用机器学习或其他预测模型的可能性显著降低(coef = -0.10, P = 0.01),提供与人工智能/机器学习相关的劳动力应用较少(coef = -0.40, P = 0.01)。分解结果表明,我们的模型规范解释了ADI Q4与ADI Q1-Q3中医院之间AI/ML采用差异的79%。此外,在不同的衡量标准中,隶属于问责保健组织的AI/ML利用差异占12%-25%。结论:人工智能/机器学习在经济弱势地区和农村地区的使用不足,特别是在劳动力管理和电子健康记录实施方面,表明这些社区可能无法充分受益于人工智能支持的医疗保健的进步。我们的研究结果进一步表明,基于价值的支付模式可以战略性地用于支持人工智能集成。
Hospital Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Adoption by Neighborhood Deprivation.
Objective: To understand the variation in artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) adoption across different hospital characteristics and explore how AI/ML is utilized, particularly in relation to neighborhood deprivation.
Background: AI/ML-assisted care coordination has the potential to reduce health disparities, but there is a lack of empirical evidence on AI's impact on health equity.
Methods: We used linked datasets from the 2022 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and the 2023 American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement. The data were further linked to the 2022 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) for each hospital's service area. State fixed-effect regressions were employed. A decomposition model was also used to quantify predictors of AI/ML implementation, comparing hospitals in higher versus lower ADI areas.
Results: Hospitals serving the most vulnerable areas (ADI Q4) were significantly less likely to apply ML or other predictive models (coef = -0.10, P = 0.01) and provided fewer AI/ML-related workforce applications (coef = -0.40, P = 0.01), compared with those in the least vulnerable areas. Decomposition results showed that our model specifications explained 79% of the variation in AI/ML adoption between hospitals in ADI Q4 versus ADI Q1-Q3. In addition, Accountable Care Organization affiliation accounted for 12%-25% of differences in AI/ML utilization across various measures.
Conclusions: The underuse of AI/ML in economically disadvantaged and rural areas, particularly in workforce management and electronic health record implementation, suggests that these communities may not fully benefit from advancements in AI-enabled health care. Our results further indicate that value-based payment models could be strategically used to support AI integration.
期刊介绍:
Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.