在全膝关节置换术中,内侧支点与十字保留设计相比提高股四头肌效率。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Leandra Bauer, Thomas R Niethammer, Christoph Thorwächter, Matthias Woiczinski, Peter E Müller, Florian Simon, Boris M Holzapfel, Johanna-Maria Simon
{"title":"在全膝关节置换术中,内侧支点与十字保留设计相比提高股四头肌效率。","authors":"Leandra Bauer, Thomas R Niethammer, Christoph Thorwächter, Matthias Woiczinski, Peter E Müller, Florian Simon, Boris M Holzapfel, Johanna-Maria Simon","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) design offers rotational freedom but risks abnormal kinematics and instability. The medial pivot (MP) design mimics native joint motion with a high-conformity medial and flat lateral interface. Within clinical studies, the MP design outclassed the CR design, but biomechanical studies are lacking. This study investigates the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics of both implant designs compared to native kinematics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens underwent total knee arthroplasty using MP and CR designs. Testing was performed in a dynamic knee rig simulating active knee flexion (30-130°) under muscle load. Biomechanical assessments included tibial rotation, tibiofemoral translation, patellar tilt/shift, patellofemoral contact/pressure patterns and quadriceps force. Functional regressions were used to analyse the effects of the component designs on the native situation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MP design exhibited increased tibial rotation (130° flexion: MP 9.4° vs. CR 6.6°) and lateral anterior tibial translation during flexion (130° flexion: MP 25.8 mm vs. CR 22.6 mm). Both designs showed no significant differences in patellar tilt or shift and similar patellofemoral pressure (CR 3.2 MPa, MP 3.4 MPa) and contact patterns (CR 213.8 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. MP 230.4 mm<sup>2</sup>). The MP design required lower quadriceps force, particularly in deep flexion (NS 452.6 N, CR 407.8 N and MP 367.3 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MP design provides a more native-like knee kinematic profile than the CR design, with a more pronounced MP motion pattern and reduced quadriceps loading.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved quadriceps efficiency with a medial pivot in comparison to a cruciate-retaining design in total knee arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Leandra Bauer, Thomas R Niethammer, Christoph Thorwächter, Matthias Woiczinski, Peter E Müller, Florian Simon, Boris M Holzapfel, Johanna-Maria Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) design offers rotational freedom but risks abnormal kinematics and instability. The medial pivot (MP) design mimics native joint motion with a high-conformity medial and flat lateral interface. Within clinical studies, the MP design outclassed the CR design, but biomechanical studies are lacking. This study investigates the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics of both implant designs compared to native kinematics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens underwent total knee arthroplasty using MP and CR designs. Testing was performed in a dynamic knee rig simulating active knee flexion (30-130°) under muscle load. Biomechanical assessments included tibial rotation, tibiofemoral translation, patellar tilt/shift, patellofemoral contact/pressure patterns and quadriceps force. Functional regressions were used to analyse the effects of the component designs on the native situation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MP design exhibited increased tibial rotation (130° flexion: MP 9.4° vs. CR 6.6°) and lateral anterior tibial translation during flexion (130° flexion: MP 25.8 mm vs. CR 22.6 mm). Both designs showed no significant differences in patellar tilt or shift and similar patellofemoral pressure (CR 3.2 MPa, MP 3.4 MPa) and contact patterns (CR 213.8 mm<sup>2</sup> vs. MP 230.4 mm<sup>2</sup>). The MP design required lower quadriceps force, particularly in deep flexion (NS 452.6 N, CR 407.8 N and MP 367.3 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MP design provides a more native-like knee kinematic profile than the CR design, with a more pronounced MP motion pattern and reduced quadriceps loading.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12624\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12624","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:后路十字支架保留(CR)设计提供了旋转自由,但存在运动异常和不稳定的风险。内侧枢轴(MP)设计模仿天然关节运动,具有高度一致性的内侧和平坦的外侧界面。在临床研究中,MP设计优于CR设计,但缺乏生物力学研究。本研究调查了两种植入物设计的胫骨股骨和髌骨运动学与天然运动学的比较。方法:采用MP和CR设计对8例新鲜冷冻尸体膝关节标本行全膝关节置换术。在模拟肌肉负荷下主动膝关节屈曲(30-130°)的动态膝关节钻机中进行测试。生物力学评估包括胫骨旋转、胫股平移、髌骨倾斜/移位、髌股接触/压力模式和股四头肌受力。使用功能回归分析组件设计对本地情况的影响。结果:MP设计增加了胫骨旋转(130°屈曲:MP 9.4°对CR 6.6°)和屈曲期间胫骨外侧前平移(130°屈曲:MP 25.8 mm对CR 22.6 mm)。两种设计在髌骨倾斜或移位、髌股压力(CR 3.2 MPa, MP 3.4 MPa)和接触模式(CR 213.8 mm2 vs MP 230.4 mm2)方面均无显著差异。MP设计需要下股四头肌力,特别是在深屈曲时(NS 452.6 N, CR 407.8 N和MP 367.3 N)。结论:与CR设计相比,MP设计提供了更像天然膝关节的运动学轮廓,具有更明显的MP运动模式和减少的股四头肌负荷。证据等级:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved quadriceps efficiency with a medial pivot in comparison to a cruciate-retaining design in total knee arthroplasty.

Purpose: The posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) design offers rotational freedom but risks abnormal kinematics and instability. The medial pivot (MP) design mimics native joint motion with a high-conformity medial and flat lateral interface. Within clinical studies, the MP design outclassed the CR design, but biomechanical studies are lacking. This study investigates the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics of both implant designs compared to native kinematics.

Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens underwent total knee arthroplasty using MP and CR designs. Testing was performed in a dynamic knee rig simulating active knee flexion (30-130°) under muscle load. Biomechanical assessments included tibial rotation, tibiofemoral translation, patellar tilt/shift, patellofemoral contact/pressure patterns and quadriceps force. Functional regressions were used to analyse the effects of the component designs on the native situation.

Results: The MP design exhibited increased tibial rotation (130° flexion: MP 9.4° vs. CR 6.6°) and lateral anterior tibial translation during flexion (130° flexion: MP 25.8 mm vs. CR 22.6 mm). Both designs showed no significant differences in patellar tilt or shift and similar patellofemoral pressure (CR 3.2 MPa, MP 3.4 MPa) and contact patterns (CR 213.8 mm2 vs. MP 230.4 mm2). The MP design required lower quadriceps force, particularly in deep flexion (NS 452.6 N, CR 407.8 N and MP 367.3 N).

Conclusion: The MP design provides a more native-like knee kinematic profile than the CR design, with a more pronounced MP motion pattern and reduced quadriceps loading.

Level of evidence: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
418
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication. The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance. Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards. Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信