抑郁的躯体和认知情感症状与炎症和胰岛素抵抗的差异关联:GRADE研究的情绪困扰子研究的横断面和纵向结果

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetologia Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s00125-025-06369-8
Dominic Ehrmann, Heidi Krause-Steinrauf, Diane Uschner, Hui Wen, Claire J Hoogendoorn, Gladys Crespo-Ramos, Caroline Presley, Valerie L Arends, Robert M Cohen, W Timothy Garvey, Thomas Martens, Holly J Willis, Andrea Cherrington, Jeffrey S Gonzalez
{"title":"抑郁的躯体和认知情感症状与炎症和胰岛素抵抗的差异关联:GRADE研究的情绪困扰子研究的横断面和纵向结果","authors":"Dominic Ehrmann, Heidi Krause-Steinrauf, Diane Uschner, Hui Wen, Claire J Hoogendoorn, Gladys Crespo-Ramos, Caroline Presley, Valerie L Arends, Robert M Cohen, W Timothy Garvey, Thomas Martens, Holly J Willis, Andrea Cherrington, Jeffrey S Gonzalez","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06369-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>Insulin resistance and inflammation are components of a biological framework that is hypothesised to be shared by type 2 diabetes and depression. However, depressive symptoms include a large heterogeneity of somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms, and this may obscure the associations within this biological framework. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were used to disentangle the contributions of insulin resistance and inflammation to somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis used data from the Emotional Distress Sub-Study of the GRADE trial. Insulin resistance and inflammation were assessed using the HOMA-IR estimation and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels, respectively, at baseline and at the study visits at year 1 and year 3 (HOMA-IR) and every 6 months (hsCRP) for up to 3 years of follow-up. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), and a total score as well as symptom cluster scores for cognitive-affective and somatic symptoms were calculated. For the cross-sectional analyses, linear regression analyses were performed, with inflammation and insulin resistance at baseline as dependent variables. For the longitudinal analyses, linear mixed-effect regression analyses were performed, with inflammation and insulin resistance at the various time points as dependent variables. In all analyses, depressive symptoms (total score and symptom cluster scores) were the independent variables, controlled for important demographic, anthropometric and metabolic confounders. For the analysis of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), data from 1321 participants were analysed. For the analysis of inflammation (hsCRP), data from 1739 participants were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cross-sectional analysis and after adjustment for potential confounders, a one-unit increase in PHQ-8 total score was significantly associated with a 0.8% increase in HOMA-IR (p=0.007), but not with hsCRP (0.6% increase, p=0.283). The somatic symptom score was associated with a 5.8% increase in HOMA-IR (p=0.004). Single-item analyses of depressive symptoms showed that fatigue (3.6% increase, p=0.002) and increased/decreased appetite (3.5% increase, p=0.009) were significantly associated with HOMA-IR cross-sectionally. The cognitive-affective symptom score was not significantly associated with HOMA-IR at baseline. In longitudinal analyses, a one-unit increase in PHQ-8 total score was significantly associated with a 0.8% increase in hsCRP over time (p=0.014), but not with HOMA-IR over time (0.1% decrease, p=0.564). Again, only the somatic symptom cluster was significantly associated with hsCRP over time (5.2% increase, p=0.017), while the cognitive-affective symptom score was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/interpretation: </strong>The results highlight the associations of depressive symptoms with markers of inflammation and insulin resistance, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In particular, somatic symptoms of depression appear to be the driver of these associations, even after controlling for concomitant conditions, with a potential role for fatigue and issues with appetite.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01794143.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":"1403-1415"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential associations of somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms of depression with inflammation and insulin resistance: cross-sectional and longitudinal results from the Emotional Distress Sub-Study of the GRADE study.\",\"authors\":\"Dominic Ehrmann, Heidi Krause-Steinrauf, Diane Uschner, Hui Wen, Claire J Hoogendoorn, Gladys Crespo-Ramos, Caroline Presley, Valerie L Arends, Robert M Cohen, W Timothy Garvey, Thomas Martens, Holly J Willis, Andrea Cherrington, Jeffrey S Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00125-025-06369-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>Insulin resistance and inflammation are components of a biological framework that is hypothesised to be shared by type 2 diabetes and depression. However, depressive symptoms include a large heterogeneity of somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms, and this may obscure the associations within this biological framework. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were used to disentangle the contributions of insulin resistance and inflammation to somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis used data from the Emotional Distress Sub-Study of the GRADE trial. Insulin resistance and inflammation were assessed using the HOMA-IR estimation and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels, respectively, at baseline and at the study visits at year 1 and year 3 (HOMA-IR) and every 6 months (hsCRP) for up to 3 years of follow-up. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), and a total score as well as symptom cluster scores for cognitive-affective and somatic symptoms were calculated. For the cross-sectional analyses, linear regression analyses were performed, with inflammation and insulin resistance at baseline as dependent variables. For the longitudinal analyses, linear mixed-effect regression analyses were performed, with inflammation and insulin resistance at the various time points as dependent variables. In all analyses, depressive symptoms (total score and symptom cluster scores) were the independent variables, controlled for important demographic, anthropometric and metabolic confounders. For the analysis of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), data from 1321 participants were analysed. For the analysis of inflammation (hsCRP), data from 1739 participants were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cross-sectional analysis and after adjustment for potential confounders, a one-unit increase in PHQ-8 total score was significantly associated with a 0.8% increase in HOMA-IR (p=0.007), but not with hsCRP (0.6% increase, p=0.283). The somatic symptom score was associated with a 5.8% increase in HOMA-IR (p=0.004). Single-item analyses of depressive symptoms showed that fatigue (3.6% increase, p=0.002) and increased/decreased appetite (3.5% increase, p=0.009) were significantly associated with HOMA-IR cross-sectionally. The cognitive-affective symptom score was not significantly associated with HOMA-IR at baseline. In longitudinal analyses, a one-unit increase in PHQ-8 total score was significantly associated with a 0.8% increase in hsCRP over time (p=0.014), but not with HOMA-IR over time (0.1% decrease, p=0.564). Again, only the somatic symptom cluster was significantly associated with hsCRP over time (5.2% increase, p=0.017), while the cognitive-affective symptom score was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/interpretation: </strong>The results highlight the associations of depressive symptoms with markers of inflammation and insulin resistance, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In particular, somatic symptoms of depression appear to be the driver of these associations, even after controlling for concomitant conditions, with a potential role for fatigue and issues with appetite.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01794143.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1403-1415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06369-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06369-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/假设:胰岛素抵抗和炎症是2型糖尿病和抑郁症共同的生物学框架的组成部分。然而,抑郁症状包括躯体和认知情感症状的巨大异质性,这可能模糊了这种生物学框架内的关联。横断面和纵向数据被用来解开胰岛素抵抗和炎症对抑郁的躯体和认知情感症状的贡献。方法:这项二次分析使用了GRADE试验的情绪困扰子研究的数据。胰岛素抵抗和炎症分别使用HOMA-IR估计和高敏感性c反应蛋白(hsCRP)水平进行评估,在基线和研究访问时,在1年和3年(HOMA-IR)和每6个月(hsCRP)进行长达3年的随访。使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-8)在基线时评估抑郁症状,并计算认知-情感和躯体症状的总分以及症状群得分。横断面分析采用线性回归分析,以基线时的炎症和胰岛素抵抗为因变量。纵向分析采用线性混合效应回归分析,以各时间点的炎症和胰岛素抵抗为因变量。在所有分析中,抑郁症状(总分和症状群得分)是独立变量,控制了重要的人口统计学、人体测量学和代谢混杂因素。为了分析胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR),分析了1321名参与者的数据。为了分析炎症(hsCRP),分析了来自1739名参与者的数据。结果:在横断面分析和调整潜在混杂因素后,PHQ-8总分每增加一个单位与HOMA-IR增加0.8%显著相关(p=0.007),但与hsCRP无关(增加0.6%,p=0.283)。躯体症状评分与HOMA-IR升高5.8%相关(p=0.004)。抑郁症状的单项分析显示,疲劳(增加3.6%,p=0.002)和食欲增加/减少(增加3.5%,p=0.009)与HOMA-IR横断面显著相关。认知-情感症状评分与基线HOMA-IR无显著相关。在纵向分析中,PHQ-8总分每增加一个单位与hsCRP随时间增加0.8%显著相关(p=0.014),但与HOMA-IR随时间增加无关(降低0.1%,p=0.564)。同样,随着时间的推移,只有躯体症状组与hsCRP显著相关(增加5.2%,p=0.017),而认知-情感症状评分则没有。结论/解释:研究结果强调了2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状与炎症和胰岛素抵抗标志物的横断面和纵向相关性。特别是,抑郁的躯体症状似乎是这些关联的驱动因素,即使在控制了伴随条件之后,也可能与疲劳和食欲问题有关。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01794143。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential associations of somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms of depression with inflammation and insulin resistance: cross-sectional and longitudinal results from the Emotional Distress Sub-Study of the GRADE study.

Aims/hypothesis: Insulin resistance and inflammation are components of a biological framework that is hypothesised to be shared by type 2 diabetes and depression. However, depressive symptoms include a large heterogeneity of somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms, and this may obscure the associations within this biological framework. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were used to disentangle the contributions of insulin resistance and inflammation to somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms of depression.

Methods: This secondary analysis used data from the Emotional Distress Sub-Study of the GRADE trial. Insulin resistance and inflammation were assessed using the HOMA-IR estimation and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels, respectively, at baseline and at the study visits at year 1 and year 3 (HOMA-IR) and every 6 months (hsCRP) for up to 3 years of follow-up. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), and a total score as well as symptom cluster scores for cognitive-affective and somatic symptoms were calculated. For the cross-sectional analyses, linear regression analyses were performed, with inflammation and insulin resistance at baseline as dependent variables. For the longitudinal analyses, linear mixed-effect regression analyses were performed, with inflammation and insulin resistance at the various time points as dependent variables. In all analyses, depressive symptoms (total score and symptom cluster scores) were the independent variables, controlled for important demographic, anthropometric and metabolic confounders. For the analysis of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), data from 1321 participants were analysed. For the analysis of inflammation (hsCRP), data from 1739 participants were analysed.

Results: In cross-sectional analysis and after adjustment for potential confounders, a one-unit increase in PHQ-8 total score was significantly associated with a 0.8% increase in HOMA-IR (p=0.007), but not with hsCRP (0.6% increase, p=0.283). The somatic symptom score was associated with a 5.8% increase in HOMA-IR (p=0.004). Single-item analyses of depressive symptoms showed that fatigue (3.6% increase, p=0.002) and increased/decreased appetite (3.5% increase, p=0.009) were significantly associated with HOMA-IR cross-sectionally. The cognitive-affective symptom score was not significantly associated with HOMA-IR at baseline. In longitudinal analyses, a one-unit increase in PHQ-8 total score was significantly associated with a 0.8% increase in hsCRP over time (p=0.014), but not with HOMA-IR over time (0.1% decrease, p=0.564). Again, only the somatic symptom cluster was significantly associated with hsCRP over time (5.2% increase, p=0.017), while the cognitive-affective symptom score was not.

Conclusion/interpretation: The results highlight the associations of depressive symptoms with markers of inflammation and insulin resistance, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In particular, somatic symptoms of depression appear to be the driver of these associations, even after controlling for concomitant conditions, with a potential role for fatigue and issues with appetite.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01794143.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信