IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Cindy M Pabon, Janine Wong, Marcela Perez, Jessica Jimenez-Abarca, Lianchun Xiao, Lymesia Jackson, Anne Park, Anjali Lankford, Vinita Akula, Saumil Datar, Taylor Hopper, Yaser Alkhatib, Terri Earles, Tejal Patel
{"title":"Successful posthospitalisation oncology workflow implementing LACE+ score to stratify and reduce readmissions within a safety-net hospital.","authors":"Cindy M Pabon, Janine Wong, Marcela Perez, Jessica Jimenez-Abarca, Lianchun Xiao, Lymesia Jackson, Anne Park, Anjali Lankford, Vinita Akula, Saumil Datar, Taylor Hopper, Yaser Alkhatib, Terri Earles, Tejal Patel","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with advanced cancers visit the emergency room and get hospitalised frequently, with potentially half of these visits being avoidable. Our institution provides comprehensive, low-cost cancer treatment to a safety-net population in Texas. We performed a retrospective review of hospital readmission patterns amongst our oncology patients and developed a posthospitalisation workflow to reduce readmissions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following discharge, oncology patients were risk stratified based on their Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson comorbidity index score and Emergency department visits+index in the past 6 months. The higher the score, the quicker the outpatient oncology follow-up. In addition to addressing acute issues related to hospitalisation, patients were also able to receive newly translated resources while in clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preintervention 30-day-readmission rate was 17.3% (June 2022-December 2022) (95% CI 13.4% to 21.8%). Meanwhile, the postintervention 30-day-readmission rate was 14.7% (June 2023-December 2023) (95% CI 10.9% to 19.2%). While a 2.6% reduction in readmissions was achieved, this decrease was not statistically significant (-2.6%; 95% CI -8.4% to 3.2%; p value=0.375). Emergency use utilisation decreased from 90% to 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our team was able to facilitate and coordinate outpatient care for oncology patients following hospitalisation. The expedited care allowed providers to ensure that the care plan after hospitalisation was well understood and accessible to the patient. Furthermore, language-appropriate resources were provided to patients at that time. Our intervention was feasible, easy to implement and quick to produce tangible improvements in patient care. More time is needed to determine whether this will create a statistically significant impact on readmission rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:晚期癌症患者经常到急诊室就诊和住院,其中有一半可能是可以避免的。我们所在的机构为得克萨斯州的安全网人群提供全面、低成本的癌症治疗。我们对肿瘤患者的再入院模式进行了回顾性研究,并制定了一套入院后工作流程,以减少再入院率:出院后,我们根据肿瘤患者的住院时间、入院时的严重程度、查尔森合并症指数评分以及过去 6 个月的急诊就诊次数+指数对其进行了风险分层。得分越高,肿瘤科门诊随访越快。除了解决与住院相关的急性问题外,患者还能在门诊时获得新翻译的资源:干预前的 30 天再入院率为 17.3%(2022 年 6 月至 2022 年 12 月)(95% CI 为 13.4% 至 21.8%)。而干预后的 30 天再入院率为 14.7%(2023 年 6 月至 2023 年 12 月)(95% CI 为 10.9% 至 19.2%)。虽然再入院率降低了 2.6%,但这一降幅在统计学上并不显著(-2.6%;95% CI -8.4% 至 3.2%;P 值=0.375)。急诊使用率从 90% 降至 15%:我们的团队能够促进和协调肿瘤患者住院后的门诊治疗。快速护理使医疗服务提供者能够确保患者充分理解并接受住院后的护理计划。此外,当时还向患者提供了与语言相适应的资源。我们的干预措施是可行的,易于实施,并能迅速为患者带来切实的护理改善。我们还需要更多的时间来确定这是否会对再入院率产生统计学意义上的重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Successful posthospitalisation oncology workflow implementing LACE+ score to stratify and reduce readmissions within a safety-net hospital.

Background: Patients with advanced cancers visit the emergency room and get hospitalised frequently, with potentially half of these visits being avoidable. Our institution provides comprehensive, low-cost cancer treatment to a safety-net population in Texas. We performed a retrospective review of hospital readmission patterns amongst our oncology patients and developed a posthospitalisation workflow to reduce readmissions.

Method: Following discharge, oncology patients were risk stratified based on their Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson comorbidity index score and Emergency department visits+index in the past 6 months. The higher the score, the quicker the outpatient oncology follow-up. In addition to addressing acute issues related to hospitalisation, patients were also able to receive newly translated resources while in clinic.

Results: The preintervention 30-day-readmission rate was 17.3% (June 2022-December 2022) (95% CI 13.4% to 21.8%). Meanwhile, the postintervention 30-day-readmission rate was 14.7% (June 2023-December 2023) (95% CI 10.9% to 19.2%). While a 2.6% reduction in readmissions was achieved, this decrease was not statistically significant (-2.6%; 95% CI -8.4% to 3.2%; p value=0.375). Emergency use utilisation decreased from 90% to 15%.

Conclusions: Our team was able to facilitate and coordinate outpatient care for oncology patients following hospitalisation. The expedited care allowed providers to ensure that the care plan after hospitalisation was well understood and accessible to the patient. Furthermore, language-appropriate resources were provided to patients at that time. Our intervention was feasible, easy to implement and quick to produce tangible improvements in patient care. More time is needed to determine whether this will create a statistically significant impact on readmission rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信