腰椎手术后功能变化:1451例患者的一项基于登记的研究

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Konsta K J Koivunen, Sara S Widbom-Kolhanen, Katri I Pernaa, Jari P A Arokoski, Mikhail Saltychev
{"title":"腰椎手术后功能变化:1451例患者的一项基于登记的研究","authors":"Konsta K J Koivunen, Sara S Widbom-Kolhanen, Katri I Pernaa, Jari P A Arokoski, Mikhail Saltychev","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.42850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> The Oswestry Disability Index has usually only been used as a composite score but, according to previous studies, disability caused by back pain may be too broad a concept to be explained by a single number. We aimed to analyze changes in each ODI item's score from preoperative to 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery by creating a functional profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a register-based study of 1,451 patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery between 2018 and 2021. The patients responded to a repeated survey preoperatively and 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The significance of change in the ODI items' scores was assessed by a symmetry test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> All the ODI items' scores and total score improved between baseline and 3-month follow-up (P < 0.001). The magnitude of this improvement varied across different items. After 3 months, no significant change was seen for most of the items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> During a postoperative 2-year follow-up, individual items of the ODI demonstrated changes of different magnitude. The results imply that the use of a single composite score of the ODI might be insufficient to describe changes in functioning among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Instead, in some situations, creating a functional profile based on the scores from individual items may be a better solution to describe the changes in disability level.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"161-166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in functional profile after lumbar spinal surgery: a register-based study among 1,451 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Konsta K J Koivunen, Sara S Widbom-Kolhanen, Katri I Pernaa, Jari P A Arokoski, Mikhail Saltychev\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2025.42850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> The Oswestry Disability Index has usually only been used as a composite score but, according to previous studies, disability caused by back pain may be too broad a concept to be explained by a single number. We aimed to analyze changes in each ODI item's score from preoperative to 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery by creating a functional profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a register-based study of 1,451 patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery between 2018 and 2021. The patients responded to a repeated survey preoperatively and 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The significance of change in the ODI items' scores was assessed by a symmetry test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> All the ODI items' scores and total score improved between baseline and 3-month follow-up (P < 0.001). The magnitude of this improvement varied across different items. After 3 months, no significant change was seen for most of the items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> During a postoperative 2-year follow-up, individual items of the ODI demonstrated changes of different magnitude. The results imply that the use of a single composite score of the ODI might be insufficient to describe changes in functioning among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Instead, in some situations, creating a functional profile based on the scores from individual items may be a better solution to describe the changes in disability level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"161-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.42850\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.42850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:Oswestry残疾指数通常只被用作一个综合评分,但根据以往的研究,背痛导致的残疾可能是一个过于宽泛的概念,无法用一个数字来解释。我们的目的是通过创建功能档案来分析术前至术后3、12和24个月各ODI项目评分的变化。方法:这是一项基于登记的研究,共有1451名患者在2018年至2021年间接受腰椎手术。患者术前和术后3、12、24个月的反复调查均有反应。采用对称检验评估ODI项目得分变化的显著性。结果:各ODI项目得分和总分较基线和随访3个月均有改善(P < 0.001)。这种改善的程度在不同的项目中有所不同。3个月后,大多数项目没有明显变化。结论:在术后2年的随访中,ODI的各个项目表现出不同程度的变化。结果表明,使用单一的ODI综合评分可能不足以描述腰椎手术患者的功能变化。相反,在某些情况下,基于单个项目的分数创建功能概要可能是描述残疾水平变化的更好解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Change in functional profile after lumbar spinal surgery: a register-based study among 1,451 patients.

Background and purpose:  The Oswestry Disability Index has usually only been used as a composite score but, according to previous studies, disability caused by back pain may be too broad a concept to be explained by a single number. We aimed to analyze changes in each ODI item's score from preoperative to 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery by creating a functional profile.

Methods:  This was a register-based study of 1,451 patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery between 2018 and 2021. The patients responded to a repeated survey preoperatively and 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The significance of change in the ODI items' scores was assessed by a symmetry test.

Results:  All the ODI items' scores and total score improved between baseline and 3-month follow-up (P < 0.001). The magnitude of this improvement varied across different items. After 3 months, no significant change was seen for most of the items.

Conclusion:  During a postoperative 2-year follow-up, individual items of the ODI demonstrated changes of different magnitude. The results imply that the use of a single composite score of the ODI might be insufficient to describe changes in functioning among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Instead, in some situations, creating a functional profile based on the scores from individual items may be a better solution to describe the changes in disability level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信