芬兰腰椎管狭窄手术1年的结果:一项全国性FinSpine登记研究。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Juho Hatakka, Inari Laaksonen, Joel Kostensalo, Keijo T Mäkelä, Henri Salo, Katri Pernaa
{"title":"芬兰腰椎管狭窄手术1年的结果:一项全国性FinSpine登记研究。","authors":"Juho Hatakka, Inari Laaksonen, Joel Kostensalo, Keijo T Mäkelä, Henri Salo, Katri Pernaa","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.42849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> While the rates of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery have increased continuously internationally, the role of fusion surgery in the treatment of LSS has been under debate. We aimed to assess the outcome of LSS surgery at 1 year postoperatively and to compare decompression surgery with or without fusion based on the Finnish national spine register FinSpine data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> FinSpine data of surgically treated LSS from 2015 to 2022 was included. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and secondary ones were Visual Analogue Scale for leg and back pain. Predetermined minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for all outcome measures was used to assess the clinical significance of differences in outcomes. Propensity score matching was utilized to ensure that the treatment groups were comparable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were 8,647 LSS patients in the data, of whom 6,751 (77%) were the subject of decompression surgery. Over 90% of patients without spondylolisthesis received decompression alone. At 1-year follow-up, ODI was on average 20.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.3-21.9]) for the fusion group and 23.3 (CI 22.5-24.0) for the decompression group. Differences in ODI, VAS leg pain, or VAS back pain were below the MCID. The share of patients reaching ODI percentage change score ≥ 30% was 74% (CI 71-78) in the fusion group and 66% (CI 63-68) in the decompression group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Most of the LSS patients experienced significant improvement after LSS surgery. We found no clinical differences between decompression surgery with and without fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1-year results of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery in Finland: a national FinSpine register study.\",\"authors\":\"Juho Hatakka, Inari Laaksonen, Joel Kostensalo, Keijo T Mäkelä, Henri Salo, Katri Pernaa\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2025.42849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> While the rates of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery have increased continuously internationally, the role of fusion surgery in the treatment of LSS has been under debate. We aimed to assess the outcome of LSS surgery at 1 year postoperatively and to compare decompression surgery with or without fusion based on the Finnish national spine register FinSpine data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> FinSpine data of surgically treated LSS from 2015 to 2022 was included. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and secondary ones were Visual Analogue Scale for leg and back pain. Predetermined minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for all outcome measures was used to assess the clinical significance of differences in outcomes. Propensity score matching was utilized to ensure that the treatment groups were comparable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were 8,647 LSS patients in the data, of whom 6,751 (77%) were the subject of decompression surgery. Over 90% of patients without spondylolisthesis received decompression alone. At 1-year follow-up, ODI was on average 20.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.3-21.9]) for the fusion group and 23.3 (CI 22.5-24.0) for the decompression group. Differences in ODI, VAS leg pain, or VAS back pain were below the MCID. The share of patients reaching ODI percentage change score ≥ 30% was 74% (CI 71-78) in the fusion group and 66% (CI 63-68) in the decompression group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Most of the LSS patients experienced significant improvement after LSS surgery. We found no clinical differences between decompression surgery with and without fusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"154-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.42849\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.42849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:虽然国际上腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)手术的发生率不断增加,但融合手术在LSS治疗中的作用一直存在争议。我们的目的是评估术后1年LSS手术的结果,并根据芬兰国家脊柱登记FinSpine数据比较有无融合的减压手术。方法:纳入2015年至2022年手术治疗的LSS的FinSpine数据。主要指标为Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),次要指标为腿部和背部疼痛的视觉模拟量表。所有结果测量指标的预定最小临床重要差异(MCID)用于评估结果差异的临床意义。使用倾向评分匹配来确保治疗组具有可比性。结果:本组共8647例LSS患者,其中6751例(77%)行减压手术。超过90%的无腰椎滑脱患者单独接受减压。1年随访时,融合组的ODI平均为20.6(95%可信区间[CI] 19.3-21.9),减压组的ODI平均为23.3 (CI 22.5-24.0)。ODI、VAS腿部疼痛或VAS背部疼痛的差异低于MCID。ODI百分比变化评分≥30%的患者比例在融合组为74% (CI 71-78),在减压组为66% (CI 63-68)。结论:大多数LSS患者在LSS手术后均有明显改善。我们发现有无融合的减压手术无临床差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
1-year results of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery in Finland: a national FinSpine register study.

Background and purpose:  While the rates of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery have increased continuously internationally, the role of fusion surgery in the treatment of LSS has been under debate. We aimed to assess the outcome of LSS surgery at 1 year postoperatively and to compare decompression surgery with or without fusion based on the Finnish national spine register FinSpine data.

Methods:  FinSpine data of surgically treated LSS from 2015 to 2022 was included. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and secondary ones were Visual Analogue Scale for leg and back pain. Predetermined minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for all outcome measures was used to assess the clinical significance of differences in outcomes. Propensity score matching was utilized to ensure that the treatment groups were comparable.

Results:  There were 8,647 LSS patients in the data, of whom 6,751 (77%) were the subject of decompression surgery. Over 90% of patients without spondylolisthesis received decompression alone. At 1-year follow-up, ODI was on average 20.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.3-21.9]) for the fusion group and 23.3 (CI 22.5-24.0) for the decompression group. Differences in ODI, VAS leg pain, or VAS back pain were below the MCID. The share of patients reaching ODI percentage change score ≥ 30% was 74% (CI 71-78) in the fusion group and 66% (CI 63-68) in the decompression group.

Conclusion:  Most of the LSS patients experienced significant improvement after LSS surgery. We found no clinical differences between decompression surgery with and without fusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信