静脉血栓栓塞患者在初始和延长治疗期间直接口服抗凝剂的出血风险高于人群对照。

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Katarina Glise Sandblad, Annika Rosengren, Sam Schulman, Maria Roupe, Tatiana Zverkova Sandström, Jacob Philipson, Kristina Svennerholm, Mazdak Tavoly
{"title":"静脉血栓栓塞患者在初始和延长治疗期间直接口服抗凝剂的出血风险高于人群对照。","authors":"Katarina Glise Sandblad,&nbsp;Annika Rosengren,&nbsp;Sam Schulman,&nbsp;Maria Roupe,&nbsp;Tatiana Zverkova Sandström,&nbsp;Jacob Philipson,&nbsp;Kristina Svennerholm,&nbsp;Mazdak Tavoly","doi":"10.1111/joim.20067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The risk of major bleeding from anticoagulant treatment is influenced by both the treatment and the patient's baseline risk, which is often disregarded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the excess bleeding risk in venous thromboembolism (VTE) cases during initial (0 to 6 months) and extended (6 months to 5 years) treatment compared to matched population controls without VTE or anticoagulant treatment, overall, and stratified by sex and age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer-free patients with VTE treated with direct oral anticoagulants from 2014 to 2020, along with propensity score–matched controls, were identified from nationwide Swedish registers. Excess risk of major bleeding was assessed using the incidence rate difference (IRD) calculated by subtracting the control bleeding rate from the case bleeding rate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The matched cohort comprised 36,115 VTE cases and 36,115 controls. During initial treatment, 388 VTE cases (1.07%) and 103 controls (0.29%) experienced bleeding, IRD: 2.19 (95% confidence interval 1.89–2.49) per 100 person-years. Following rematching at 6 months, 139 cases (0.70%) and 214 controls (1.08%) experienced bleeding, IRD: 0.70 (0.52–0.89). During initial treatment, females had a higher excess bleeding risk than males, with male IRD: 1.73 (1.34–2.12) and female IRD: 2.69 (2.23–3.15). Excess bleeding risk was highest in the oldest patient population. In extended treatment, excess bleeding was not dependent on sex—male IRD: 0.60 (0.35–0.85), female IRD: 0.81 (0.54–1.08)—and did not increase with age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The excess bleeding risk from anticoagulant treatment was high during initial treatment, particularly among females and the elderly, but lower and not influenced by sex or age during extended treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"297 4","pages":"382-399"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.20067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excess risk of bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism on direct oral anticoagulants during initial and extended treatment versus population controls\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Glise Sandblad,&nbsp;Annika Rosengren,&nbsp;Sam Schulman,&nbsp;Maria Roupe,&nbsp;Tatiana Zverkova Sandström,&nbsp;Jacob Philipson,&nbsp;Kristina Svennerholm,&nbsp;Mazdak Tavoly\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joim.20067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The risk of major bleeding from anticoagulant treatment is influenced by both the treatment and the patient's baseline risk, which is often disregarded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine the excess bleeding risk in venous thromboembolism (VTE) cases during initial (0 to 6 months) and extended (6 months to 5 years) treatment compared to matched population controls without VTE or anticoagulant treatment, overall, and stratified by sex and age.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cancer-free patients with VTE treated with direct oral anticoagulants from 2014 to 2020, along with propensity score–matched controls, were identified from nationwide Swedish registers. Excess risk of major bleeding was assessed using the incidence rate difference (IRD) calculated by subtracting the control bleeding rate from the case bleeding rate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The matched cohort comprised 36,115 VTE cases and 36,115 controls. During initial treatment, 388 VTE cases (1.07%) and 103 controls (0.29%) experienced bleeding, IRD: 2.19 (95% confidence interval 1.89–2.49) per 100 person-years. Following rematching at 6 months, 139 cases (0.70%) and 214 controls (1.08%) experienced bleeding, IRD: 0.70 (0.52–0.89). During initial treatment, females had a higher excess bleeding risk than males, with male IRD: 1.73 (1.34–2.12) and female IRD: 2.69 (2.23–3.15). Excess bleeding risk was highest in the oldest patient population. In extended treatment, excess bleeding was not dependent on sex—male IRD: 0.60 (0.35–0.85), female IRD: 0.81 (0.54–1.08)—and did not increase with age.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The excess bleeding risk from anticoagulant treatment was high during initial treatment, particularly among females and the elderly, but lower and not influenced by sex or age during extended treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"297 4\",\"pages\":\"382-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.20067\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.20067\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.20067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗凝治疗引起大出血的风险受到治疗和患者基线风险的影响,这一点经常被忽视。目的:确定静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)病例在初始(0 - 6个月)和延长(6个月- 5年)治疗期间的过度出血风险,与未接受VTE或抗凝治疗的匹配人群对照进行总体和按性别和年龄分层。方法:2014年至2020年接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的无癌静脉血栓栓塞患者,以及倾向评分匹配的对照组,来自瑞典全国登记册。用病例出血率减去对照出血率计算的发生率差(IRD)来评估大出血的过度风险。结果:匹配队列包括36,115例静脉血栓栓塞病例和36,115例对照。在初始治疗期间,388例静脉血栓栓塞患者(1.07%)和103例对照组(0.29%)出现出血,IRD: 2.19(95%可信区间1.89-2.49)/ 100人年。6个月重新配对后,139例(0.70%)和214例对照组(1.08%)出现出血,IRD: 0.70(0.52-0.89)。在初始治疗期间,女性的过量出血风险高于男性,男性IRD: 1.73(1.34-2.12),女性IRD: 2.69(2.23-3.15)。高龄患者的过度出血风险最高。在长期治疗中,过量出血不依赖于性别——男性IRD: 0.60(0.35-0.85),女性IRD: 0.81(0.54-1.08)——并且不随年龄增加而增加。结论:抗凝治疗引起的过量出血风险在初始治疗期间较高,特别是在女性和老年人中,但在延长治疗期间较低且不受性别和年龄的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Excess risk of bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism on direct oral anticoagulants during initial and extended treatment versus population controls

Excess risk of bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism on direct oral anticoagulants during initial and extended treatment versus population controls

Background

The risk of major bleeding from anticoagulant treatment is influenced by both the treatment and the patient's baseline risk, which is often disregarded.

Objectives

To determine the excess bleeding risk in venous thromboembolism (VTE) cases during initial (0 to 6 months) and extended (6 months to 5 years) treatment compared to matched population controls without VTE or anticoagulant treatment, overall, and stratified by sex and age.

Methods

Cancer-free patients with VTE treated with direct oral anticoagulants from 2014 to 2020, along with propensity score–matched controls, were identified from nationwide Swedish registers. Excess risk of major bleeding was assessed using the incidence rate difference (IRD) calculated by subtracting the control bleeding rate from the case bleeding rate.

Results

The matched cohort comprised 36,115 VTE cases and 36,115 controls. During initial treatment, 388 VTE cases (1.07%) and 103 controls (0.29%) experienced bleeding, IRD: 2.19 (95% confidence interval 1.89–2.49) per 100 person-years. Following rematching at 6 months, 139 cases (0.70%) and 214 controls (1.08%) experienced bleeding, IRD: 0.70 (0.52–0.89). During initial treatment, females had a higher excess bleeding risk than males, with male IRD: 1.73 (1.34–2.12) and female IRD: 2.69 (2.23–3.15). Excess bleeding risk was highest in the oldest patient population. In extended treatment, excess bleeding was not dependent on sex—male IRD: 0.60 (0.35–0.85), female IRD: 0.81 (0.54–1.08)—and did not increase with age.

Conclusion

The excess bleeding risk from anticoagulant treatment was high during initial treatment, particularly among females and the elderly, but lower and not influenced by sex or age during extended treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Internal Medicine
Journal of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JIM – The Journal of Internal Medicine, in continuous publication since 1863, is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original work in clinical science, spanning from bench to bedside, encompassing a wide range of internal medicine and its subspecialties. JIM showcases original articles, reviews, brief reports, and research letters in the field of internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信