利用先天性上肢差异(can)登记法重新探讨短指和裂型共指亚型的区分。

Emma Landes, Charles A Goldfarb, Michelle James, Deborah Bohn, Andrea Bauer, Lindley B Wall
{"title":"利用先天性上肢差异(can)登记法重新探讨短指和裂型共指亚型的区分。","authors":"Emma Landes, Charles A Goldfarb, Michelle James, Deborah Bohn, Andrea Bauer, Lindley B Wall","doi":"10.1177/17531934251318222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this investigation was to investigate short finger and cleft type symbrachydactyly to identify the defining features of these two subtypes. This retrospective study extracted data from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry. Five paediatric hand surgeons reviewed photographs and radiographic imaging to evaluate the characteristics of each subtype and the reliability of diagnosis and evaluated the recorded diagnosis in the registry. Final analysis included 50 short finger and 54 cleft type symbrachydactyly. Key characteristic patterns were identified for each type, with further subdivision of subtypes with notable hypoplasia of the index or ring fingers or all digits. Consensus was obtained (inter-rater reliability 78%) and reliably applied for these unique subclassifications. While no clear trend in increasing severity was identified for these two subgroups of symbrachydactyly, this re-classification exercise provides clearer definition of the different subtypes and may give insight into the developmental biology of these conditions, predict future clinical function and guide surgical outcomes.<b>Level of evidence:</b> IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"17531934251318222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting short finger and cleft type symbrachydactyly subtype differentiation utilizing the congenital upper limb differences (CoULD) registry.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Landes, Charles A Goldfarb, Michelle James, Deborah Bohn, Andrea Bauer, Lindley B Wall\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17531934251318222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this investigation was to investigate short finger and cleft type symbrachydactyly to identify the defining features of these two subtypes. This retrospective study extracted data from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry. Five paediatric hand surgeons reviewed photographs and radiographic imaging to evaluate the characteristics of each subtype and the reliability of diagnosis and evaluated the recorded diagnosis in the registry. Final analysis included 50 short finger and 54 cleft type symbrachydactyly. Key characteristic patterns were identified for each type, with further subdivision of subtypes with notable hypoplasia of the index or ring fingers or all digits. Consensus was obtained (inter-rater reliability 78%) and reliably applied for these unique subclassifications. While no clear trend in increasing severity was identified for these two subgroups of symbrachydactyly, this re-classification exercise provides clearer definition of the different subtypes and may give insight into the developmental biology of these conditions, predict future clinical function and guide surgical outcomes.<b>Level of evidence:</b> IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17531934251318222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251318222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251318222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是调查短指和裂型共指,以确定这两个亚型的定义特征。本回顾性研究从先天性上肢差异(CoULD)登记处提取数据。五名儿科手外科医生回顾了照片和放射成像,以评估每种亚型的特征和诊断的可靠性,并评估了登记中记录的诊断。最后分析了50例短指和54例裂型共指。确定了每种类型的关键特征模式,并进一步细分了亚型,显着的食指或无名指或所有手指发育不全。获得了共识(评分间信度78%),并可靠地应用于这些独特的子分类。虽然没有明确的趋势,增加严重程度的这两个亚群的共指,这种重新分类的练习提供了不同亚型的更清晰的定义,并可能提供洞察这些条件的发育生物学,预测未来的临床功能和指导手术结果。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting short finger and cleft type symbrachydactyly subtype differentiation utilizing the congenital upper limb differences (CoULD) registry.

The purpose of this investigation was to investigate short finger and cleft type symbrachydactyly to identify the defining features of these two subtypes. This retrospective study extracted data from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry. Five paediatric hand surgeons reviewed photographs and radiographic imaging to evaluate the characteristics of each subtype and the reliability of diagnosis and evaluated the recorded diagnosis in the registry. Final analysis included 50 short finger and 54 cleft type symbrachydactyly. Key characteristic patterns were identified for each type, with further subdivision of subtypes with notable hypoplasia of the index or ring fingers or all digits. Consensus was obtained (inter-rater reliability 78%) and reliably applied for these unique subclassifications. While no clear trend in increasing severity was identified for these two subgroups of symbrachydactyly, this re-classification exercise provides clearer definition of the different subtypes and may give insight into the developmental biology of these conditions, predict future clinical function and guide surgical outcomes.Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信