在临床环境中与聋人患者交流:从虚拟患者小组中获得的经验教训。

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20608.1
Natalie P Snyder, Benedicta O Olonilua, Rosemary Frasso, Julia Croce, Dimitrios Papanagnou
{"title":"在临床环境中与聋人患者交流:从虚拟患者小组中获得的经验教训。","authors":"Natalie P Snyder, Benedicta O Olonilua, Rosemary Frasso, Julia Croce, Dimitrios Papanagnou","doi":"10.12688/mep.20608.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communication and cultural differences predispose Deaf patients to suboptimal healthcare. Despite this disparity, health professionals have historically received little to no training in caring for Deaf patients. Patient panels are an effective tool in medical education to model communication strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this paper, we describe the design, implementation, and results of a virtual patient panel focused on communicating with Deaf patients in clinical contexts. We offer practical suggestions for incorporating similar educational interventions in health professions education to prepare trainees to effectively navigate these conversations with their patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The panel consisted of a one-hour question and answer discussion facilitated by the authors with Deaf patients and Certified Deaf Interpreters (CDI). The panel was presented to 271 second-year medical students at our institution in November of 2023. Following this discussion, students were encouraged to share one or two key takeaways from the session through a survey link. These results were analyzed using pile-sorting qualitative analysis to identify main themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 73 respondents, with a response rate of 27%. After the panel, the most popular takeaway points from student reflections included communication ( <i>n</i>=56, 77%) and access to care ( <i>n</i>=47, 64%), followed by autonomy ( <i>n</i>=17, 23%), the doctor-patient relationship ( <i>n</i>=15, 21%), and culture ( <i>n</i>=11, 15%). Based on this initiative, we identified and offer twelve tips for developing similar exercises. These tips are thematically presented under three groupings: Planning Considerations, Patient Panelist Considerations, In-Session Considerations, and Post-Session Considerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This patient panel was the first of its kind in our medical school curriculum. Important considerations in panel design and implementation should focus on delivery time constraints with live-interpreting and further exploring the role of trust and communication in the physician-patient relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"14 ","pages":"218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11814955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating with Deaf Patients in the Clinical Environment: Lessons Learned from a Virtual Patient Panel.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie P Snyder, Benedicta O Olonilua, Rosemary Frasso, Julia Croce, Dimitrios Papanagnou\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.20608.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communication and cultural differences predispose Deaf patients to suboptimal healthcare. Despite this disparity, health professionals have historically received little to no training in caring for Deaf patients. Patient panels are an effective tool in medical education to model communication strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this paper, we describe the design, implementation, and results of a virtual patient panel focused on communicating with Deaf patients in clinical contexts. We offer practical suggestions for incorporating similar educational interventions in health professions education to prepare trainees to effectively navigate these conversations with their patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The panel consisted of a one-hour question and answer discussion facilitated by the authors with Deaf patients and Certified Deaf Interpreters (CDI). The panel was presented to 271 second-year medical students at our institution in November of 2023. Following this discussion, students were encouraged to share one or two key takeaways from the session through a survey link. These results were analyzed using pile-sorting qualitative analysis to identify main themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 73 respondents, with a response rate of 27%. After the panel, the most popular takeaway points from student reflections included communication ( <i>n</i>=56, 77%) and access to care ( <i>n</i>=47, 64%), followed by autonomy ( <i>n</i>=17, 23%), the doctor-patient relationship ( <i>n</i>=15, 21%), and culture ( <i>n</i>=11, 15%). Based on this initiative, we identified and offer twelve tips for developing similar exercises. These tips are thematically presented under three groupings: Planning Considerations, Patient Panelist Considerations, In-Session Considerations, and Post-Session Considerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This patient panel was the first of its kind in our medical school curriculum. Important considerations in panel design and implementation should focus on delivery time constraints with live-interpreting and further exploring the role of trust and communication in the physician-patient relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11814955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20608.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20608.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:沟通和文化差异使聋人患者易出现次优医疗保健。尽管存在这种差异,但卫生专业人员在照顾聋人患者方面几乎没有接受过任何培训。病人小组是医学教育中建立沟通策略模型的有效工具。目的:在本文中,我们描述了一个虚拟患者小组的设计、实现和结果,重点是在临床环境中与聋人患者交流。我们提供实用的建议,将类似的教育干预措施纳入卫生专业教育,使受训者能够有效地与患者进行这些对话。方法:小组由作者与聋人患者和认证聋人口译员(CDI)进行一小时的问答讨论。该小组于2023年11月在我们机构向271名二年级医学生展示。在这个讨论之后,学生们被鼓励通过一个调查链接分享一两个从会议中得到的关键结论。这些结果进行分析,采用堆分类定性分析,以确定主要主题。结果:调查对象73人,回复率27%。在小组讨论之后,学生反思中最受欢迎的要点包括沟通(n=56, 77%)和获得护理(n=47, 64%),其次是自主性(n=17, 23%),医患关系(n=15, 21%)和文化(n=11, 15%)。基于这一倡议,我们确定并提供了开发类似练习的12个技巧。这些提示按主题分为三组:计划注意事项、患者小组注意事项、会期注意事项和会期后注意事项。结论:这个病人小组是我们医学院课程中第一个这样的小组。小组设计和实施的重要考虑因素应集中在现场口译的交付时间限制上,并进一步探索信任和沟通在医患关系中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communicating with Deaf Patients in the Clinical Environment: Lessons Learned from a Virtual Patient Panel.

Background: Communication and cultural differences predispose Deaf patients to suboptimal healthcare. Despite this disparity, health professionals have historically received little to no training in caring for Deaf patients. Patient panels are an effective tool in medical education to model communication strategies.

Objective: In this paper, we describe the design, implementation, and results of a virtual patient panel focused on communicating with Deaf patients in clinical contexts. We offer practical suggestions for incorporating similar educational interventions in health professions education to prepare trainees to effectively navigate these conversations with their patients.

Methods: The panel consisted of a one-hour question and answer discussion facilitated by the authors with Deaf patients and Certified Deaf Interpreters (CDI). The panel was presented to 271 second-year medical students at our institution in November of 2023. Following this discussion, students were encouraged to share one or two key takeaways from the session through a survey link. These results were analyzed using pile-sorting qualitative analysis to identify main themes.

Results: There were 73 respondents, with a response rate of 27%. After the panel, the most popular takeaway points from student reflections included communication ( n=56, 77%) and access to care ( n=47, 64%), followed by autonomy ( n=17, 23%), the doctor-patient relationship ( n=15, 21%), and culture ( n=11, 15%). Based on this initiative, we identified and offer twelve tips for developing similar exercises. These tips are thematically presented under three groupings: Planning Considerations, Patient Panelist Considerations, In-Session Considerations, and Post-Session Considerations.

Conclusion: This patient panel was the first of its kind in our medical school curriculum. Important considerations in panel design and implementation should focus on delivery time constraints with live-interpreting and further exploring the role of trust and communication in the physician-patient relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信