在单发膀胱肿瘤的整体切除术中应用针电极。

Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) Pub Date : 2024-12-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14440/bladder.2024.0030
Qiang Cheng, Bin Jiang, Jinlu Tang, Wenfeng Gao, Yanqi Liu, Fan Gao, Yin Lu, Yi Feng, Bingyang Guo, Xupeng Zhao, Qing Ai, Hongzhao Li
{"title":"在单发膀胱肿瘤的整体切除术中应用针电极。","authors":"Qiang Cheng, Bin Jiang, Jinlu Tang, Wenfeng Gao, Yanqi Liu, Fan Gao, Yin Lu, Yi Feng, Bingyang Guo, Xupeng Zhao, Qing Ai, Hongzhao Li","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2024.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transurethral resection of bladder tumor is associated with some limitations when used in the diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored the application of needle electrodes in the transurethral resection of single bladder tumor (SBT) and highlighted the advantages of <i>en bloc</i> resection of bladder tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 79 patients with SBT treated at the Department of Urology, People's Liberation Army General Hospital, from January to December 2023. Among the patients, 64 (81.0%) were male, and 15 (19.0%) were female, with a mean age of 62.6 years. Among the patients, 68 (86.1%) had primary tumors, 11 (13.9%) had recurrent tumors, and 2 (2.5%) had SBTs following upper urothelial carcinoma radical resection. All patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors using needle electrodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were successfully completed. The mean operation time lasted 51.0 min, and the mean blood loss was 7.9 mL. The median tumor size was 2 cm. The obturator nerve block was employed in 22 (33.8%) cases. The incidence of obturator nerve reflex was 40.9% (9/22) and 23.3% (10/43) without (<i>p</i> = 0.139). Post-operative complications included bladder tamponade in one patient (1.3%). The accuracy of muscle invasion reporting was 89.9%. Three patients were lost to follow-up, and two patients (2.6%) suffered from recurrence at 6 months. The median follow-up time was 13 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Needle electrode resection for SBTs was highly safe, had low complication rates, and offered accurate tumor staging, resulting in precise treatment and low postoperative recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":"11 4","pages":"e21200025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of needle electrodes in <i>en bloc</i> resection of single bladder tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Cheng, Bin Jiang, Jinlu Tang, Wenfeng Gao, Yanqi Liu, Fan Gao, Yin Lu, Yi Feng, Bingyang Guo, Xupeng Zhao, Qing Ai, Hongzhao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.14440/bladder.2024.0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transurethral resection of bladder tumor is associated with some limitations when used in the diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored the application of needle electrodes in the transurethral resection of single bladder tumor (SBT) and highlighted the advantages of <i>en bloc</i> resection of bladder tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 79 patients with SBT treated at the Department of Urology, People's Liberation Army General Hospital, from January to December 2023. Among the patients, 64 (81.0%) were male, and 15 (19.0%) were female, with a mean age of 62.6 years. Among the patients, 68 (86.1%) had primary tumors, 11 (13.9%) had recurrent tumors, and 2 (2.5%) had SBTs following upper urothelial carcinoma radical resection. All patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors using needle electrodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were successfully completed. The mean operation time lasted 51.0 min, and the mean blood loss was 7.9 mL. The median tumor size was 2 cm. The obturator nerve block was employed in 22 (33.8%) cases. The incidence of obturator nerve reflex was 40.9% (9/22) and 23.3% (10/43) without (<i>p</i> = 0.139). Post-operative complications included bladder tamponade in one patient (1.3%). The accuracy of muscle invasion reporting was 89.9%. Three patients were lost to follow-up, and two patients (2.6%) suffered from recurrence at 6 months. The median follow-up time was 13 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Needle electrode resection for SBTs was highly safe, had low complication rates, and offered accurate tumor staging, resulting in precise treatment and low postoperative recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"e21200025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2024.0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2024.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of needle electrodes in en bloc resection of single bladder tumor.

Background: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor is associated with some limitations when used in the diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Objectives: This study explored the application of needle electrodes in the transurethral resection of single bladder tumor (SBT) and highlighted the advantages of en bloc resection of bladder tumors.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 79 patients with SBT treated at the Department of Urology, People's Liberation Army General Hospital, from January to December 2023. Among the patients, 64 (81.0%) were male, and 15 (19.0%) were female, with a mean age of 62.6 years. Among the patients, 68 (86.1%) had primary tumors, 11 (13.9%) had recurrent tumors, and 2 (2.5%) had SBTs following upper urothelial carcinoma radical resection. All patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors using needle electrodes.

Results: All procedures were successfully completed. The mean operation time lasted 51.0 min, and the mean blood loss was 7.9 mL. The median tumor size was 2 cm. The obturator nerve block was employed in 22 (33.8%) cases. The incidence of obturator nerve reflex was 40.9% (9/22) and 23.3% (10/43) without (p = 0.139). Post-operative complications included bladder tamponade in one patient (1.3%). The accuracy of muscle invasion reporting was 89.9%. Three patients were lost to follow-up, and two patients (2.6%) suffered from recurrence at 6 months. The median follow-up time was 13 months.

Conclusion: Needle electrode resection for SBTs was highly safe, had low complication rates, and offered accurate tumor staging, resulting in precise treatment and low postoperative recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信