Susan Yuill, Megan A Smith, Louiza S Velentzis, Monjura Nisha, Marion Saville, Erich V Kliewer, Deborah Bateson, Karen Canfell
{"title":"在澳大利亚新南威尔士州按分娩地点分娩的妇女中参与国家子宫颈筛查计划：数据联系分析。","authors":"Susan Yuill, Megan A Smith, Louiza S Velentzis, Monjura Nisha, Marion Saville, Erich V Kliewer, Deborah Bateson, Karen Canfell","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>High participation rates in the National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) by all groups of women are required to ensure the equitable elimination of cervical cancer in Australia. In this study, we examine screening participation of overseas-born women compared to Australian-born women who gave birth.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health datasets.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Women who gave birth in New South Wales between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2017.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Participation in the NCSP (≥ 1 cytology test) in the 3- and 5-year periods prior to delivery by place of maternal birth, adjusted for multiple socio-demographic and health characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1 332 669 mothers who gave birth over the study period, overall cervical screening participation in the 3- and 5-year periods prior to delivery was 67.0% and 75.7%, respectively. Participation was lower for overseas-born mothers compared to Australian-born mothers for both the 3-year (57.8% vs. 71.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.51) and 5-year (64.9% vs. 81.2%; aOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.40-0.40) participation periods. All groups of overseas-born women had substantially lower screening participation compared to Australian-born women, with the lowest relative 3-year participation in mothers born in Southern/Central Asia (aOR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.30-0.31), Oceania (aOR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.30-0.32), North-East Asia (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.48-0.50), and New Zealand (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.48-0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overseas-born women had around half the cervical screening participation in the period prior to birth compared to Australian-born women. It is likely that opportunities to screen these under-screened groups during the antenatal period, typically a time of repeated health services contact, are missed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participation in the National Cervical Screening Program Among Women Who Gave Birth in New South Wales, Australia by Place of Maternal Birth: A Data Linkage Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Susan Yuill, Megan A Smith, Louiza S Velentzis, Monjura Nisha, Marion Saville, Erich V Kliewer, Deborah Bateson, Karen Canfell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>High participation rates in the National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) by all groups of women are required to ensure the equitable elimination of cervical cancer in Australia. In this study, we examine screening participation of overseas-born women compared to Australian-born women who gave birth.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health datasets.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Women who gave birth in New South Wales between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2017.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Participation in the NCSP (≥ 1 cytology test) in the 3- and 5-year periods prior to delivery by place of maternal birth, adjusted for multiple socio-demographic and health characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1 332 669 mothers who gave birth over the study period, overall cervical screening participation in the 3- and 5-year periods prior to delivery was 67.0% and 75.7%, respectively. Participation was lower for overseas-born mothers compared to Australian-born mothers for both the 3-year (57.8% vs. 71.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.51) and 5-year (64.9% vs. 81.2%; aOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.40-0.40) participation periods. All groups of overseas-born women had substantially lower screening participation compared to Australian-born women, with the lowest relative 3-year participation in mothers born in Southern/Central Asia (aOR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.30-0.31), Oceania (aOR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.30-0.32), North-East Asia (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.48-0.50), and New Zealand (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.48-0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overseas-born women had around half the cervical screening participation in the period prior to birth compared to Australian-born women. It is likely that opportunities to screen these under-screened groups during the antenatal period, typically a time of repeated health services contact, are missed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13939\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Participation in the National Cervical Screening Program Among Women Who Gave Birth in New South Wales, Australia by Place of Maternal Birth: A Data Linkage Analysis.
Objective: High participation rates in the National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) by all groups of women are required to ensure the equitable elimination of cervical cancer in Australia. In this study, we examine screening participation of overseas-born women compared to Australian-born women who gave birth.
Design: Population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health datasets.
Setting and participants: Women who gave birth in New South Wales between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2017.
Main outcome measures: Participation in the NCSP (≥ 1 cytology test) in the 3- and 5-year periods prior to delivery by place of maternal birth, adjusted for multiple socio-demographic and health characteristics.
Results: Among the 1 332 669 mothers who gave birth over the study period, overall cervical screening participation in the 3- and 5-year periods prior to delivery was 67.0% and 75.7%, respectively. Participation was lower for overseas-born mothers compared to Australian-born mothers for both the 3-year (57.8% vs. 71.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.51) and 5-year (64.9% vs. 81.2%; aOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.40-0.40) participation periods. All groups of overseas-born women had substantially lower screening participation compared to Australian-born women, with the lowest relative 3-year participation in mothers born in Southern/Central Asia (aOR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.30-0.31), Oceania (aOR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.30-0.32), North-East Asia (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.48-0.50), and New Zealand (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.48-0.51).
Conclusions: Overseas-born women had around half the cervical screening participation in the period prior to birth compared to Australian-born women. It is likely that opportunities to screen these under-screened groups during the antenatal period, typically a time of repeated health services contact, are missed.
期刊介绍：
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
