Juan Antonio Carbonell-Asins, Elena Jiménez-Martí, Sergio Romero, Eduardo García, Ana Miralles-Marco, Beatriz Lopez, Marisol Huerta, Carmelo Caballero, Hugo Boggino, Cinthia Gauna, Olga Beatriz Acevedo-Funes, Gabriel Benitez Nuñez, Claudia Melina Céspedes-Cardozo, Edith A Fernandez-Figueroa, Nayeli Ortiz-Olvera, Erika Ruiz-García, Fátima Carneiro, Rita Barros, Ceu Figueiredo, Rui M Ferreira, Tessa Suzanne Groen-van Schooten, Demi van Santvliet, Sarah Derks, Romina Luca, Maria Alsina, Arnoldo Riquelme, Andrés Cervantes, Tania Fleitas
{"title":"在CELAC和欧洲的普通人群中实施胃癌意识教育干预:LEGACy联盟提出的一项策略。","authors":"Juan Antonio Carbonell-Asins, Elena Jiménez-Martí, Sergio Romero, Eduardo García, Ana Miralles-Marco, Beatriz Lopez, Marisol Huerta, Carmelo Caballero, Hugo Boggino, Cinthia Gauna, Olga Beatriz Acevedo-Funes, Gabriel Benitez Nuñez, Claudia Melina Céspedes-Cardozo, Edith A Fernandez-Figueroa, Nayeli Ortiz-Olvera, Erika Ruiz-García, Fátima Carneiro, Rita Barros, Ceu Figueiredo, Rui M Ferreira, Tessa Suzanne Groen-van Schooten, Demi van Santvliet, Sarah Derks, Romina Luca, Maria Alsina, Arnoldo Riquelme, Andrés Cervantes, Tania Fleitas","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02578-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer (GC) has a poor prognosis. The LEGACy consortium has been established to enhance GC outcomes though improved primary and secondary prevention strategies. We performed an educational intervention study using an online module to disseminate knowledge about GC risk factors and symptoms to the general population. Participants were recruited through various media channels and were exposed to an online questionnaire to assess their knowledge, before and after the educational intervention. The educational intervention included an informative brochure and a short video providing essential information about GC. Primary outcome was to evaluate the overall knowledge (global score) before and after the intervention. A total of 1034 participants were evaluated before the intervention. Of those, 866 also completed the short-term and 362 the long-term questionnaire after the intervention, respectively. On a scale of 0 to 17, the baseline global score mean was 9.4 (3.2). Results showed an increase in the average global knowledge score by 1.80 (95% CI: 1.63-1.96, p < 0.001) and 1.81 (95% CI: 1.65-1.96, p < 0.001) points after completing the short and long-term questionnaires compared to the baseline respectively for all individual questions (p < 0.05). This interventional study showed significantly improved knowledge in most domains on GC risk factors, signs, and symptoms which could be a useful strategy for promoting cancer prevention. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04019808.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of an Educational Intervention for Gastric Cancer Awareness in the General Population in CELAC and Europe: A Strategy Proposed by the LEGACy Consortium.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Antonio Carbonell-Asins, Elena Jiménez-Martí, Sergio Romero, Eduardo García, Ana Miralles-Marco, Beatriz Lopez, Marisol Huerta, Carmelo Caballero, Hugo Boggino, Cinthia Gauna, Olga Beatriz Acevedo-Funes, Gabriel Benitez Nuñez, Claudia Melina Céspedes-Cardozo, Edith A Fernandez-Figueroa, Nayeli Ortiz-Olvera, Erika Ruiz-García, Fátima Carneiro, Rita Barros, Ceu Figueiredo, Rui M Ferreira, Tessa Suzanne Groen-van Schooten, Demi van Santvliet, Sarah Derks, Romina Luca, Maria Alsina, Arnoldo Riquelme, Andrés Cervantes, Tania Fleitas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02578-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gastric cancer (GC) has a poor prognosis. The LEGACy consortium has been established to enhance GC outcomes though improved primary and secondary prevention strategies. We performed an educational intervention study using an online module to disseminate knowledge about GC risk factors and symptoms to the general population. Participants were recruited through various media channels and were exposed to an online questionnaire to assess their knowledge, before and after the educational intervention. The educational intervention included an informative brochure and a short video providing essential information about GC. Primary outcome was to evaluate the overall knowledge (global score) before and after the intervention. A total of 1034 participants were evaluated before the intervention. Of those, 866 also completed the short-term and 362 the long-term questionnaire after the intervention, respectively. On a scale of 0 to 17, the baseline global score mean was 9.4 (3.2). Results showed an increase in the average global knowledge score by 1.80 (95% CI: 1.63-1.96, p < 0.001) and 1.81 (95% CI: 1.65-1.96, p < 0.001) points after completing the short and long-term questionnaires compared to the baseline respectively for all individual questions (p < 0.05). This interventional study showed significantly improved knowledge in most domains on GC risk factors, signs, and symptoms which could be a useful strategy for promoting cancer prevention. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04019808.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02578-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02578-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
胃癌(GC)预后较差。LEGACy联盟的建立是为了通过改进一级和二级预防策略来提高GC结果。我们使用在线模块进行了一项教育干预研究,向普通人群传播有关胃癌危险因素和症状的知识。参与者通过各种媒体渠道招募,并在教育干预之前和之后接受在线问卷调查,以评估他们的知识。教育干预包括一本信息丰富的小册子和一个简短的视频,提供有关GC的基本信息。主要结果是评估干预前后的总体知识(总体得分)。干预前共对1034名参与者进行了评估。其中866人在干预后完成了短期问卷,362人完成了长期问卷。在0到17的范围内,基线总体得分平均值为9.4(3.2)。结果显示,全球知识平均分增加了1.80分(95% CI: 1.63-1.96, p
Implementation of an Educational Intervention for Gastric Cancer Awareness in the General Population in CELAC and Europe: A Strategy Proposed by the LEGACy Consortium.
Gastric cancer (GC) has a poor prognosis. The LEGACy consortium has been established to enhance GC outcomes though improved primary and secondary prevention strategies. We performed an educational intervention study using an online module to disseminate knowledge about GC risk factors and symptoms to the general population. Participants were recruited through various media channels and were exposed to an online questionnaire to assess their knowledge, before and after the educational intervention. The educational intervention included an informative brochure and a short video providing essential information about GC. Primary outcome was to evaluate the overall knowledge (global score) before and after the intervention. A total of 1034 participants were evaluated before the intervention. Of those, 866 also completed the short-term and 362 the long-term questionnaire after the intervention, respectively. On a scale of 0 to 17, the baseline global score mean was 9.4 (3.2). Results showed an increase in the average global knowledge score by 1.80 (95% CI: 1.63-1.96, p < 0.001) and 1.81 (95% CI: 1.65-1.96, p < 0.001) points after completing the short and long-term questionnaires compared to the baseline respectively for all individual questions (p < 0.05). This interventional study showed significantly improved knowledge in most domains on GC risk factors, signs, and symptoms which could be a useful strategy for promoting cancer prevention. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04019808.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.