[德国医院用药安全:结构化质量报告分析]。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2501-0241
Nadin Kastirke, Beatrice Groß
{"title":"[德国医院用药安全:结构化质量报告分析]。","authors":"Nadin Kastirke, Beatrice Groß","doi":"10.1055/a-2501-0241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medication safety represents an increasingly pertinent aspect of quality and risk management in hospitals. However, little is known about the relevance of specific methods in controlling medication safety with respect to medical care processes. The aim of this study, therefore, is to assess the implementation of medication safety measures and the significance of specific hospital characteristics.We analyzed data from 2018, comprising structured quality reports of 1987 sites that were the first to contain information on 13 medication safety tools and measures. Relative implementation rates were assessed both in general and for subgroups. The latter were formed based on site size, presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. The relevance of corresponding differences between subgroups was examined using threshold analysis.Across all 13 medication safety measures, implementation rates varied highly (gapless medication safety after hospital release: 71.4%; SOP for good prescription practice: 23.5%). Rates also increased in relation to site size from 31.5% (<50 hospital beds) to 61.5% (>500 hospital beds). This pattern was especially prevalent for medication safety measures pertaining to electronics and IT. There were significant differences between eight measures based on the presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. Two measures (medication safety training, description of optimal medication processes) did not vary with the hospital characteristics.Our results highlight the importance of standardized assessments of quality assurance data in hospital settings. The present data analysis enables the identification of those measures that have already been implemented. Implementation seems to be associated with hospital characteristics as well as regulatory guidelines. However, it is noteworthy that medication safety measures are not being implemented across the board. This might be explained by economic, social and technological barriers. These hurdles should be dealt with on a long-term basis and via adequate incentives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"193-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Medication safety in German hospitals: An analysis of structured quality reports].\",\"authors\":\"Nadin Kastirke, Beatrice Groß\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2501-0241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medication safety represents an increasingly pertinent aspect of quality and risk management in hospitals. However, little is known about the relevance of specific methods in controlling medication safety with respect to medical care processes. The aim of this study, therefore, is to assess the implementation of medication safety measures and the significance of specific hospital characteristics.We analyzed data from 2018, comprising structured quality reports of 1987 sites that were the first to contain information on 13 medication safety tools and measures. Relative implementation rates were assessed both in general and for subgroups. The latter were formed based on site size, presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. The relevance of corresponding differences between subgroups was examined using threshold analysis.Across all 13 medication safety measures, implementation rates varied highly (gapless medication safety after hospital release: 71.4%; SOP for good prescription practice: 23.5%). Rates also increased in relation to site size from 31.5% (<50 hospital beds) to 61.5% (>500 hospital beds). This pattern was especially prevalent for medication safety measures pertaining to electronics and IT. There were significant differences between eight measures based on the presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. Two measures (medication safety training, description of optimal medication processes) did not vary with the hospital characteristics.Our results highlight the importance of standardized assessments of quality assurance data in hospital settings. The present data analysis enables the identification of those measures that have already been implemented. Implementation seems to be associated with hospital characteristics as well as regulatory guidelines. However, it is noteworthy that medication safety measures are not being implemented across the board. This might be explained by economic, social and technological barriers. These hurdles should be dealt with on a long-term basis and via adequate incentives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"193-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2501-0241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2501-0241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物安全是医院质量和风险管理日益相关的一个方面。然而,在控制药物安全的具体方法与医疗保健过程的相关性知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是评估实施用药安全措施的具体医院特点的意义。我们分析了2018年的数据,包括1987个站点的结构化质量报告,这些站点首次包含13种药物安全工具和措施的信息。对总体和亚组的相对执行率进行了评估。后者是根据场地大小、专业部门的存在以及大学医院的隶属关系而形成的。使用阈值分析检查亚组间相应差异的相关性。在所有13项用药安全措施中,实施率差异很大(出院后无间隙用药安全:71.4%;良好处方操作SOP: 23.5%)。与医院面积相关的费率也从31.5%(500张病床)增加。这种模式在与电子和IT相关的药物安全措施中尤其普遍。基于专科的存在和大学医院隶属关系的八项措施之间存在显着差异。两项措施(用药安全培训、最佳用药流程描述)不随医院特点而变化。我们的研究结果强调了在医院环境中对质量保证数据进行标准化评估的重要性。目前的数据分析可以确定已经执行的措施。实施似乎与医院特点和监管指南有关。然而,值得注意的是,药物安全措施并没有全面实施。这可以用经济、社会和技术壁垒来解释。这些障碍应在长期基础上通过适当的激励措施加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Medication safety in German hospitals: An analysis of structured quality reports].

Medication safety represents an increasingly pertinent aspect of quality and risk management in hospitals. However, little is known about the relevance of specific methods in controlling medication safety with respect to medical care processes. The aim of this study, therefore, is to assess the implementation of medication safety measures and the significance of specific hospital characteristics.We analyzed data from 2018, comprising structured quality reports of 1987 sites that were the first to contain information on 13 medication safety tools and measures. Relative implementation rates were assessed both in general and for subgroups. The latter were formed based on site size, presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. The relevance of corresponding differences between subgroups was examined using threshold analysis.Across all 13 medication safety measures, implementation rates varied highly (gapless medication safety after hospital release: 71.4%; SOP for good prescription practice: 23.5%). Rates also increased in relation to site size from 31.5% (<50 hospital beds) to 61.5% (>500 hospital beds). This pattern was especially prevalent for medication safety measures pertaining to electronics and IT. There were significant differences between eight measures based on the presence of specialized departments as well as university hospital affiliation. Two measures (medication safety training, description of optimal medication processes) did not vary with the hospital characteristics.Our results highlight the importance of standardized assessments of quality assurance data in hospital settings. The present data analysis enables the identification of those measures that have already been implemented. Implementation seems to be associated with hospital characteristics as well as regulatory guidelines. However, it is noteworthy that medication safety measures are not being implemented across the board. This might be explained by economic, social and technological barriers. These hurdles should be dealt with on a long-term basis and via adequate incentives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信