鼻咽气道与内镜下呼吸面罩治疗肥胖门诊患者无痛胃肠内镜低氧血症的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2025-02-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S499308
Dongmei Xiang, Lei Deng, Rui Zhou, Xianjie Zhang, Lei Tian, Wencai Jiang, Yukai Zhou, Wenya Chen, Yanhua Peng
{"title":"鼻咽气道与内镜下呼吸面罩治疗肥胖门诊患者无痛胃肠内镜低氧血症的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。","authors":"Dongmei Xiang, Lei Deng, Rui Zhou, Xianjie Zhang, Lei Tian, Wencai Jiang, Yukai Zhou, Wenya Chen, Yanhua Peng","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S499308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sedatives and anesthetics can modify airway tone and induce respiratory depression, exacerbating the gas exchange impairments associated with obesity. In obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy, upper airway obstruction and hypoventilation are prevalent, leading to frequent occurrences of hypoxemia during the procedure. This study aims to investigate the effects of the nasopharyngeal airway in mitigating hypoxemia via alleviating upper airway obstruction in obese outpatients during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective single-center randomized controlled study. After signing the written informed consent, eligible outpatients scheduled for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy will be randomly allocated into the nasopharyngeal airway group (group N) and control group (group C), with 88 patients in each group. Patients in group N will undergo intubation of the nasopharyngeal airway prior to examination, whereas patients in group C will receive oxygen therapy through an endoscopic respiratory mask at a flow rate of 10 L/min during the procedure. All patients in two groups will receive propofol and opioids for procedural sedation. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes will be the incidence of epistaxis, suspended examination due to hypoxemia, manual ventilation, the times of attempt to nasopharynx airway insertion, duration of insertion of nasopharyngeal airway, tracheal/laryngeal mask intubation, adverse cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal complications, VAS score of nasopharynx pain after removing the nasopharyngeal airway, satisfaction score of patients, endoscopist and anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study evaluates the effects of nasopharyngeal airway insertion on hypoxemia caused by procedural sedation in obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence for the use of nasopharyngeal airway in obese outpatients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2300078892.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Nasopharyngeal Airway with Endoscopic Respiratory Mask for Hypoxemia in Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Obese Outpatients: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dongmei Xiang, Lei Deng, Rui Zhou, Xianjie Zhang, Lei Tian, Wencai Jiang, Yukai Zhou, Wenya Chen, Yanhua Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S499308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sedatives and anesthetics can modify airway tone and induce respiratory depression, exacerbating the gas exchange impairments associated with obesity. In obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy, upper airway obstruction and hypoventilation are prevalent, leading to frequent occurrences of hypoxemia during the procedure. This study aims to investigate the effects of the nasopharyngeal airway in mitigating hypoxemia via alleviating upper airway obstruction in obese outpatients during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective single-center randomized controlled study. After signing the written informed consent, eligible outpatients scheduled for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy will be randomly allocated into the nasopharyngeal airway group (group N) and control group (group C), with 88 patients in each group. Patients in group N will undergo intubation of the nasopharyngeal airway prior to examination, whereas patients in group C will receive oxygen therapy through an endoscopic respiratory mask at a flow rate of 10 L/min during the procedure. All patients in two groups will receive propofol and opioids for procedural sedation. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes will be the incidence of epistaxis, suspended examination due to hypoxemia, manual ventilation, the times of attempt to nasopharynx airway insertion, duration of insertion of nasopharyngeal airway, tracheal/laryngeal mask intubation, adverse cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal complications, VAS score of nasopharynx pain after removing the nasopharyngeal airway, satisfaction score of patients, endoscopist and anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study evaluates the effects of nasopharyngeal airway insertion on hypoxemia caused by procedural sedation in obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence for the use of nasopharyngeal airway in obese outpatients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2300078892.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"97-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818828/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S499308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S499308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

镇静剂和麻醉药可改变气道张力,诱发呼吸抑制,加重肥胖相关的气体交换障碍。在接受胃肠内镜检查的肥胖患者中,普遍存在上气道阻塞和通气不足,导致手术过程中经常发生低氧血症。本研究旨在探讨鼻咽气道通过减轻肥胖门诊患者在无痛胃肠内镜手术中上呼吸道阻塞而减轻低氧血症的作用。方法:这是一项前瞻性单中心随机对照研究。在签署书面知情同意书后,将符合条件的门诊无痛胃肠内镜患者随机分为鼻咽气道组(N组)和对照组(C组),每组88例。N组患者在检查前插管鼻咽气道,C组患者在检查过程中通过内镜呼吸面罩以10 L/min的流速吸氧。两组患者均给予异丙酚和阿片类药物进行程序性镇静。主要结果将是低氧血症的发生率。次要观察指标为鼻出血发生率、低氧血症导致的暂停检查、人工通气、鼻咽气道插入尝试次数、鼻咽气道插入时间、气管/喉罩插管、心血管不良事件、胃肠道并发症、鼻咽气道移除后鼻咽部疼痛VAS评分、患者、内镜医师和麻醉医师满意度评分。讨论:本研究评估鼻咽气道插入对接受胃肠内镜检查的肥胖患者手术镇静引起的低氧血症的影响。本研究结果有望为肥胖门诊患者使用鼻咽气道提供依据。试验注册号:ChiCTR2300078892。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Nasopharyngeal Airway with Endoscopic Respiratory Mask for Hypoxemia in Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Obese Outpatients: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Sedatives and anesthetics can modify airway tone and induce respiratory depression, exacerbating the gas exchange impairments associated with obesity. In obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy, upper airway obstruction and hypoventilation are prevalent, leading to frequent occurrences of hypoxemia during the procedure. This study aims to investigate the effects of the nasopharyngeal airway in mitigating hypoxemia via alleviating upper airway obstruction in obese outpatients during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy procedure.

Methods: This is a prospective single-center randomized controlled study. After signing the written informed consent, eligible outpatients scheduled for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy will be randomly allocated into the nasopharyngeal airway group (group N) and control group (group C), with 88 patients in each group. Patients in group N will undergo intubation of the nasopharyngeal airway prior to examination, whereas patients in group C will receive oxygen therapy through an endoscopic respiratory mask at a flow rate of 10 L/min during the procedure. All patients in two groups will receive propofol and opioids for procedural sedation. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes will be the incidence of epistaxis, suspended examination due to hypoxemia, manual ventilation, the times of attempt to nasopharynx airway insertion, duration of insertion of nasopharyngeal airway, tracheal/laryngeal mask intubation, adverse cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal complications, VAS score of nasopharynx pain after removing the nasopharyngeal airway, satisfaction score of patients, endoscopist and anesthesiologists.

Discussion: This study evaluates the effects of nasopharyngeal airway insertion on hypoxemia caused by procedural sedation in obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence for the use of nasopharyngeal airway in obese outpatients.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300078892.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信