Lilian Zhan, Juanita Brown, Sharon Gustowski, Patrick Davis, Mario Loomis
{"title":"利用腕背弓肌肉能量的整骨疗法操作后腕管尺寸:一项初步研究。","authors":"Lilian Zhan, Juanita Brown, Sharon Gustowski, Patrick Davis, Mario Loomis","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. When mild to moderate in severity, nonoperative treatments including osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) have been found to be effective. Studies have been carried out to quantify the mechanism of such treatments with cadaver studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot project investigated the mechanism of a previously undescribed technique of nonoperative carpal tunnel treatment, dorsal carpal arch muscle energy (DCA-ME), which focuses on the dorsal arch (trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, and hamate bones) manipulating the bones to redome the arch, round the tunnel, and increase its volume. Although the actual effectiveness of such manipulation in the treatment of CTS can only be assessed and quantified in patients with the disorder, this initial study was carried out to see if it was feasible for physical changes following DCA-ME to be quantified with ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot study of 25 healthy volunteers with no prior history of CTS or related disorders was undertaken to quantify anatomical changes in carpal tunnel dimensions following OMT of the nondominant wrist, utilizing DCA-ME. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the OMT group (n=14) or the control group (n=11). The control group underwent a sham manipulation. Pre- and postultrasound measurements of carpal tunnel dimensions were made. The study employed a two-group, pre-/postmanipulation design to evaluate the anatomical changes resulting from the OMT manipulation compared to those following the control sham manipulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of the OMT and control groups revealed a mean increase in carpal tunnel depth from 0.45 mm ± 0.13 mm pre-OMT to 0.48 mm ± 0.13 mm post-OMT (p=0.0146, Cohen's <i>d</i>=0.214, 95 % CI 0.0068 to 0.0517). There was also a mean increase in cross-sectional area from 1.83 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 0.56 mm<sup>2</sup> pre-OMT to 1.98 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 0.59 mm<sup>2</sup> post-OMT (p=0.0058, Cohen's <i>d</i>=0.260, 95 % CI 0.0517 to 0.2490). There was no significant difference in canal width (p=0.5973) or transverse carpal ligament length (p=0.2673) following OMT intervention. The control group, which received the sham procedure, demonstrated no significant differences in the transverse carpal ligament length, carpal tunnel width, depth, or cross-sectional area before and after the sham intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound measurements at the narrowest section of the carpal tunnel before and after DCA-ME OMT of healthy asymptomatic wrists demonstrated a significant increase in cross-sectional area as well as depth, with no significant change in the length of the transverse carpal ligament, suggesting that the cause of the increased volume is an alteration of dorsal arch shape. A limitation of the study is the small sample size, inclusion of only healthy wrists, the short period of time between manipulation and measurements, and the difficulty of assuring the same level and angle of ultrasound measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"417-423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carpal tunnel dimensions following osteopathic manipulation utilizing dorsal carpal arch muscle energy: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Lilian Zhan, Juanita Brown, Sharon Gustowski, Patrick Davis, Mario Loomis\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jom-2024-0167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. When mild to moderate in severity, nonoperative treatments including osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) have been found to be effective. Studies have been carried out to quantify the mechanism of such treatments with cadaver studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot project investigated the mechanism of a previously undescribed technique of nonoperative carpal tunnel treatment, dorsal carpal arch muscle energy (DCA-ME), which focuses on the dorsal arch (trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, and hamate bones) manipulating the bones to redome the arch, round the tunnel, and increase its volume. Although the actual effectiveness of such manipulation in the treatment of CTS can only be assessed and quantified in patients with the disorder, this initial study was carried out to see if it was feasible for physical changes following DCA-ME to be quantified with ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot study of 25 healthy volunteers with no prior history of CTS or related disorders was undertaken to quantify anatomical changes in carpal tunnel dimensions following OMT of the nondominant wrist, utilizing DCA-ME. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the OMT group (n=14) or the control group (n=11). The control group underwent a sham manipulation. Pre- and postultrasound measurements of carpal tunnel dimensions were made. The study employed a two-group, pre-/postmanipulation design to evaluate the anatomical changes resulting from the OMT manipulation compared to those following the control sham manipulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of the OMT and control groups revealed a mean increase in carpal tunnel depth from 0.45 mm ± 0.13 mm pre-OMT to 0.48 mm ± 0.13 mm post-OMT (p=0.0146, Cohen's <i>d</i>=0.214, 95 % CI 0.0068 to 0.0517). There was also a mean increase in cross-sectional area from 1.83 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 0.56 mm<sup>2</sup> pre-OMT to 1.98 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 0.59 mm<sup>2</sup> post-OMT (p=0.0058, Cohen's <i>d</i>=0.260, 95 % CI 0.0517 to 0.2490). There was no significant difference in canal width (p=0.5973) or transverse carpal ligament length (p=0.2673) following OMT intervention. The control group, which received the sham procedure, demonstrated no significant differences in the transverse carpal ligament length, carpal tunnel width, depth, or cross-sectional area before and after the sham intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound measurements at the narrowest section of the carpal tunnel before and after DCA-ME OMT of healthy asymptomatic wrists demonstrated a significant increase in cross-sectional area as well as depth, with no significant change in the length of the transverse carpal ligament, suggesting that the cause of the increased volume is an alteration of dorsal arch shape. A limitation of the study is the small sample size, inclusion of only healthy wrists, the short period of time between manipulation and measurements, and the difficulty of assuring the same level and angle of ultrasound measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"417-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腕管综合征(CTS)是最常见的压迫性神经病变。当严重程度轻至中度时,非手术治疗包括骨疗法手法治疗(OMT)已被发现是有效的。通过尸体研究、磁共振成像(MRI)和超声,已经开展了量化这种治疗机制的研究。目的:本试点项目研究了先前描述的非手术腕管治疗技术的机制,腕弓背肌能量(DCA-ME),其重点是背弓(斜方骨、梯形骨、头状骨和钩状骨)操纵骨骼来重塑弓,绕过隧道,并增加其体积。虽然这种手法治疗CTS的实际效果只能在患有该疾病的患者中进行评估和量化,但本初步研究是为了确定DCA-ME后的物理变化是否可以用超声来量化。方法:对25名没有CTS病史或相关疾病的健康志愿者进行初步研究,利用DCA-ME量化非优势腕关节OMT后腕管尺寸的解剖变化。受试者被随机分配到OMT组(n=14)或对照组(n=11)。对照组进行假操作。超声前后测量腕管尺寸。该研究采用两组手法前/手法后设计来评估OMT手法与对照假手法后的解剖变化。结果:与对照组相比,OMT组腕管深度从OMT前的0.45 mm±0.13 mm增加到OMT后的0.48 mm±0.13 mm (p=0.0146, Cohen’s d=0.214, 95 % CI 0.0068 ~ 0.0517)。横截面积也从omt前的1.83 mm2±0.56 mm2增加到omt后的1.98 mm2±0.59 mm2 (p=0.0058, Cohen's d=0.260, 95 % CI 0.0517至0.2490)。经OMT干预后,腕管宽度(p=0.5973)和腕横韧带长度(p=0.2673)无显著差异。对照组接受假手术,在假干预前后腕横韧带长度、腕管宽度、深度或横截面积均无显著差异。结论:健康无症状腕关节行DCA-ME OMT前后,腕管最窄段超声测量显示,腕管截面积和深度明显增加,腕横韧带长度无明显变化,提示其体积增加的原因是背弓形状的改变。该研究的一个局限性是样本量小,只包括健康的手腕,操作和测量之间的时间短,难以保证超声测量的相同水平和角度。
Carpal tunnel dimensions following osteopathic manipulation utilizing dorsal carpal arch muscle energy: a pilot study.
Context: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. When mild to moderate in severity, nonoperative treatments including osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) have been found to be effective. Studies have been carried out to quantify the mechanism of such treatments with cadaver studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound.
Objectives: This pilot project investigated the mechanism of a previously undescribed technique of nonoperative carpal tunnel treatment, dorsal carpal arch muscle energy (DCA-ME), which focuses on the dorsal arch (trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, and hamate bones) manipulating the bones to redome the arch, round the tunnel, and increase its volume. Although the actual effectiveness of such manipulation in the treatment of CTS can only be assessed and quantified in patients with the disorder, this initial study was carried out to see if it was feasible for physical changes following DCA-ME to be quantified with ultrasound.
Methods: A pilot study of 25 healthy volunteers with no prior history of CTS or related disorders was undertaken to quantify anatomical changes in carpal tunnel dimensions following OMT of the nondominant wrist, utilizing DCA-ME. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the OMT group (n=14) or the control group (n=11). The control group underwent a sham manipulation. Pre- and postultrasound measurements of carpal tunnel dimensions were made. The study employed a two-group, pre-/postmanipulation design to evaluate the anatomical changes resulting from the OMT manipulation compared to those following the control sham manipulation.
Results: Comparison of the OMT and control groups revealed a mean increase in carpal tunnel depth from 0.45 mm ± 0.13 mm pre-OMT to 0.48 mm ± 0.13 mm post-OMT (p=0.0146, Cohen's d=0.214, 95 % CI 0.0068 to 0.0517). There was also a mean increase in cross-sectional area from 1.83 mm2 ± 0.56 mm2 pre-OMT to 1.98 mm2 ± 0.59 mm2 post-OMT (p=0.0058, Cohen's d=0.260, 95 % CI 0.0517 to 0.2490). There was no significant difference in canal width (p=0.5973) or transverse carpal ligament length (p=0.2673) following OMT intervention. The control group, which received the sham procedure, demonstrated no significant differences in the transverse carpal ligament length, carpal tunnel width, depth, or cross-sectional area before and after the sham intervention.
Conclusions: Ultrasound measurements at the narrowest section of the carpal tunnel before and after DCA-ME OMT of healthy asymptomatic wrists demonstrated a significant increase in cross-sectional area as well as depth, with no significant change in the length of the transverse carpal ligament, suggesting that the cause of the increased volume is an alteration of dorsal arch shape. A limitation of the study is the small sample size, inclusion of only healthy wrists, the short period of time between manipulation and measurements, and the difficulty of assuring the same level and angle of ultrasound measurements.