重子振荡光谱巡天中出现的违反奇偶校验的信号是否与样本差异有关?

IF 4.3 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
O H E Philcox, J Ereza
{"title":"重子振荡光谱巡天中出现的违反奇偶校验的信号是否与样本差异有关?","authors":"O H E Philcox, J Ereza","doi":"10.1098/rsta.2024.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent works have uncovered an excess signal in the parity-odd four-point correlation function measured from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) galaxy catalogue. If physical in origin, this could indicate new parity-breaking processes in inflation. At heart, these studies compare the observed four-point correlator with the distribution obtained from parity-conserving mock galaxy surveys; if the simulations underestimate the covariance of the data, noise fluctuations may be misinterpreted as a signal. To test this, we reanalyse the BOSS CMASS parity-odd dataset with the noise distribution model using the newly developed GLAM-Uchuu suite of mocks. These comprise full [Formula: see text]-body simulations that follow the evolution of [Formula: see text] dark matter particles and represent a significant upgrade compared with the formerly used MultiDark-Patchy mocks, which were based on an alternative (non [Formula: see text]-body) gravity solver. We find no significant evidence for parity-violation (with a baseline detection significance of [Formula: see text]), suggesting that the former signal ([Formula: see text] with our data cuts) could be caused by an underestimation of the covariance in MultiDark-Patchy. The significant differences between results obtained with the two sets of BOSS-calibrated galaxy catalogues (whose covariances differ at the [Formula: see text] level) showcase the heightened sensitivity of beyond-two-point analyses to nonlinear effects and indicate that previous constraints may suffer from large systematic uncertainties.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Challenging the standard cosmological model'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19879,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences","volume":"383 2290","pages":"20240034"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could sample variance be responsible for the parity-violating signal seen in the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey?\",\"authors\":\"O H E Philcox, J Ereza\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsta.2024.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent works have uncovered an excess signal in the parity-odd four-point correlation function measured from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) galaxy catalogue. If physical in origin, this could indicate new parity-breaking processes in inflation. At heart, these studies compare the observed four-point correlator with the distribution obtained from parity-conserving mock galaxy surveys; if the simulations underestimate the covariance of the data, noise fluctuations may be misinterpreted as a signal. To test this, we reanalyse the BOSS CMASS parity-odd dataset with the noise distribution model using the newly developed GLAM-Uchuu suite of mocks. These comprise full [Formula: see text]-body simulations that follow the evolution of [Formula: see text] dark matter particles and represent a significant upgrade compared with the formerly used MultiDark-Patchy mocks, which were based on an alternative (non [Formula: see text]-body) gravity solver. We find no significant evidence for parity-violation (with a baseline detection significance of [Formula: see text]), suggesting that the former signal ([Formula: see text] with our data cuts) could be caused by an underestimation of the covariance in MultiDark-Patchy. The significant differences between results obtained with the two sets of BOSS-calibrated galaxy catalogues (whose covariances differ at the [Formula: see text] level) showcase the heightened sensitivity of beyond-two-point analyses to nonlinear effects and indicate that previous constraints may suffer from large systematic uncertainties.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Challenging the standard cosmological model'.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences\",\"volume\":\"383 2290\",\"pages\":\"20240034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Could sample variance be responsible for the parity-violating signal seen in the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey?

Recent works have uncovered an excess signal in the parity-odd four-point correlation function measured from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) galaxy catalogue. If physical in origin, this could indicate new parity-breaking processes in inflation. At heart, these studies compare the observed four-point correlator with the distribution obtained from parity-conserving mock galaxy surveys; if the simulations underestimate the covariance of the data, noise fluctuations may be misinterpreted as a signal. To test this, we reanalyse the BOSS CMASS parity-odd dataset with the noise distribution model using the newly developed GLAM-Uchuu suite of mocks. These comprise full [Formula: see text]-body simulations that follow the evolution of [Formula: see text] dark matter particles and represent a significant upgrade compared with the formerly used MultiDark-Patchy mocks, which were based on an alternative (non [Formula: see text]-body) gravity solver. We find no significant evidence for parity-violation (with a baseline detection significance of [Formula: see text]), suggesting that the former signal ([Formula: see text] with our data cuts) could be caused by an underestimation of the covariance in MultiDark-Patchy. The significant differences between results obtained with the two sets of BOSS-calibrated galaxy catalogues (whose covariances differ at the [Formula: see text] level) showcase the heightened sensitivity of beyond-two-point analyses to nonlinear effects and indicate that previous constraints may suffer from large systematic uncertainties.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Challenging the standard cosmological model'.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Continuing its long history of influential scientific publishing, Philosophical Transactions A publishes high-quality theme issues on topics of current importance and general interest within the physical, mathematical and engineering sciences, guest-edited by leading authorities and comprising new research, reviews and opinions from prominent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信