美国堕胎禁令和婴儿死亡率。

Q1 Medicine
Alison Gemmill, Alexander M Franks, Selena Anjur-Dietrich, Amy Ozinsky, David Arbour, Elizabeth A Stuart, Eli Ben-Michael, Avi Feller, Suzanne O Bell
{"title":"美国堕胎禁令和婴儿死亡率。","authors":"Alison Gemmill, Alexander M Franks, Selena Anjur-Dietrich, Amy Ozinsky, David Arbour, Elizabeth A Stuart, Eli Ben-Michael, Avi Feller, Suzanne O Bell","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.28517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The impact of recent abortion bans on infant mortality is not fully understood. There is also limited evidence on how these bans may interact with long-standing racial and ethnic disparities in infant health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association of abortion bans with changes in infant mortality and to compare this association in racial and ethnic groups based on analyses within and across states.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This population-based, serial, cross-sectional study used a bayesian panel model to examine infant mortality rates in 14 states that implemented complete or 6-week abortion bans and compared them with predictions of infant mortality rates based on pre-ban mortality rates and states without bans. Data included all live births and infant deaths from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia for 2012 through 2023. Models accounted for temporal trends and state-specific factors, with analyses stratified by race and ethnicity, timing of death, and cause of death.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Complete or 6-week abortion bans.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Infant mortality rate, analyzed overall and by subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis found higher than expected infant mortality in states after adoption of abortion bans (observed vs expected, 6.26 vs 5.93 per 1000 live births; absolute increase, 0.33 [95% credible interval (CrI), 0.14-0.51]; relative increase, 5.60% [95% CrI, 2.43%-8.73%]). This resulted in an estimated 478 excess infant deaths in the 14 states with bans during the months affected by bans. The estimated increases were higher among non-Hispanic Black infants compared with other racial and ethnic groups, with 11.81 observed vs 10.66 expected infant deaths per 1000 live births, an absolute increase of 1.15 (95% CrI, 0.53-1.81) and relative increase of 10.98% (95% CrI, 4.87%-17.89%). The observed infant mortality rate due to congenital anomalies was 1.37 vs 1.24 expected (absolute increase, 0.13 [95% CrI, 0.04-0.21]; relative increase, 10.87% [95% CrI, 3.39%-18.08%]), while the rate not due to congenital anomalies was 4.89 observed vs 4.69 expected (absolute increase, 0.20 [95% CrI, 0.02-0.38]; relative increase, 4.23% [95% CrI, 0.49%-8.23%]). Texas had a dominant influence on the overall results and there were larger increases in southern vs nonsouthern states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>US states that adopted abortion bans had higher than expected infant mortality after the bans took effect. The estimated relative increases in infant mortality were larger for deaths with congenital causes and among groups that had higher than average infant mortality rates at baseline, including Black infants and those in southern states.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1315-1323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"US Abortion Bans and Infant Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Alison Gemmill, Alexander M Franks, Selena Anjur-Dietrich, Amy Ozinsky, David Arbour, Elizabeth A Stuart, Eli Ben-Michael, Avi Feller, Suzanne O Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jama.2024.28517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The impact of recent abortion bans on infant mortality is not fully understood. There is also limited evidence on how these bans may interact with long-standing racial and ethnic disparities in infant health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association of abortion bans with changes in infant mortality and to compare this association in racial and ethnic groups based on analyses within and across states.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This population-based, serial, cross-sectional study used a bayesian panel model to examine infant mortality rates in 14 states that implemented complete or 6-week abortion bans and compared them with predictions of infant mortality rates based on pre-ban mortality rates and states without bans. Data included all live births and infant deaths from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia for 2012 through 2023. Models accounted for temporal trends and state-specific factors, with analyses stratified by race and ethnicity, timing of death, and cause of death.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Complete or 6-week abortion bans.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Infant mortality rate, analyzed overall and by subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis found higher than expected infant mortality in states after adoption of abortion bans (observed vs expected, 6.26 vs 5.93 per 1000 live births; absolute increase, 0.33 [95% credible interval (CrI), 0.14-0.51]; relative increase, 5.60% [95% CrI, 2.43%-8.73%]). This resulted in an estimated 478 excess infant deaths in the 14 states with bans during the months affected by bans. The estimated increases were higher among non-Hispanic Black infants compared with other racial and ethnic groups, with 11.81 observed vs 10.66 expected infant deaths per 1000 live births, an absolute increase of 1.15 (95% CrI, 0.53-1.81) and relative increase of 10.98% (95% CrI, 4.87%-17.89%). The observed infant mortality rate due to congenital anomalies was 1.37 vs 1.24 expected (absolute increase, 0.13 [95% CrI, 0.04-0.21]; relative increase, 10.87% [95% CrI, 3.39%-18.08%]), while the rate not due to congenital anomalies was 4.89 observed vs 4.69 expected (absolute increase, 0.20 [95% CrI, 0.02-0.38]; relative increase, 4.23% [95% CrI, 0.49%-8.23%]). Texas had a dominant influence on the overall results and there were larger increases in southern vs nonsouthern states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>US states that adopted abortion bans had higher than expected infant mortality after the bans took effect. The estimated relative increases in infant mortality were larger for deaths with congenital causes and among groups that had higher than average infant mortality rates at baseline, including Black infants and those in southern states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1315-1323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.28517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.28517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:最近禁止堕胎对婴儿死亡率的影响尚不完全清楚。关于这些禁令如何与婴儿健康方面长期存在的种族和民族差异相互作用的证据也有限。目的:研究堕胎禁令与婴儿死亡率变化的关系,并根据州内和州间的分析比较种族和族裔群体之间的关系。设计、环境和参与者:这项基于人群的、连续的、横断面研究使用贝叶斯面板模型检查了14个实施完全堕胎禁令或6周堕胎禁令的州的婴儿死亡率,并将其与基于禁令前死亡率和没有禁令的州的婴儿死亡率预测进行了比较。数据包括2012年至2023年美国所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区的所有活产和婴儿死亡。模型考虑了时间趋势和各州具体因素,并按种族和民族、死亡时间和死亡原因进行了分层分析。曝光:完全或6周的堕胎禁令。主要结果和措施:婴儿死亡率,总体和亚组分析。结果:分析发现,采用堕胎禁令后各州的婴儿死亡率高于预期(观察到的vs预期的,每1000例活产6.26 vs 5.93;绝对增加,0.33[95%可信区间(CrI), 0.14-0.51];相对上升5.60% [95% CrI, 2.43% ~ 8.73%])。这导致在受禁令影响的月份里,14个实施禁令的州估计多死亡478名婴儿。与其他种族和族裔群体相比,非西班牙裔黑人婴儿的估计增长更高,每1000例活产婴儿死亡11.81 vs 10.66,绝对增长1.15 (95% CrI, 0.53-1.81),相对增长10.98% (95% CrI, 4.87%-17.89%)。观察到的先天性异常婴儿死亡率为1.37 vs 1.24(绝对增加,0.13 [95% CrI, 0.04-0.21];相对增加10.87% [95% CrI, 3.39% ~ 18.08%]),而非先天性异常发生率为4.89 vs 4.69(绝对增加0.20 [95% CrI, 0.02 ~ 0.38];相对升高4.23% [95% CrI, 0.49%-8.23%])。德克萨斯州对总体结果的影响占主导地位,南部各州比非南部各州的增幅更大。结论:实施堕胎禁令的美国各州在禁令生效后的婴儿死亡率高于预期。婴儿死亡率的估计相对增长在先天性死亡和在基线时婴儿死亡率高于平均水平的群体中更大,包括黑人婴儿和南部各州的婴儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
US Abortion Bans and Infant Mortality.

Importance: The impact of recent abortion bans on infant mortality is not fully understood. There is also limited evidence on how these bans may interact with long-standing racial and ethnic disparities in infant health.

Objective: To examine the association of abortion bans with changes in infant mortality and to compare this association in racial and ethnic groups based on analyses within and across states.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based, serial, cross-sectional study used a bayesian panel model to examine infant mortality rates in 14 states that implemented complete or 6-week abortion bans and compared them with predictions of infant mortality rates based on pre-ban mortality rates and states without bans. Data included all live births and infant deaths from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia for 2012 through 2023. Models accounted for temporal trends and state-specific factors, with analyses stratified by race and ethnicity, timing of death, and cause of death.

Exposure: Complete or 6-week abortion bans.

Main outcome and measures: Infant mortality rate, analyzed overall and by subgroups.

Results: The analysis found higher than expected infant mortality in states after adoption of abortion bans (observed vs expected, 6.26 vs 5.93 per 1000 live births; absolute increase, 0.33 [95% credible interval (CrI), 0.14-0.51]; relative increase, 5.60% [95% CrI, 2.43%-8.73%]). This resulted in an estimated 478 excess infant deaths in the 14 states with bans during the months affected by bans. The estimated increases were higher among non-Hispanic Black infants compared with other racial and ethnic groups, with 11.81 observed vs 10.66 expected infant deaths per 1000 live births, an absolute increase of 1.15 (95% CrI, 0.53-1.81) and relative increase of 10.98% (95% CrI, 4.87%-17.89%). The observed infant mortality rate due to congenital anomalies was 1.37 vs 1.24 expected (absolute increase, 0.13 [95% CrI, 0.04-0.21]; relative increase, 10.87% [95% CrI, 3.39%-18.08%]), while the rate not due to congenital anomalies was 4.89 observed vs 4.69 expected (absolute increase, 0.20 [95% CrI, 0.02-0.38]; relative increase, 4.23% [95% CrI, 0.49%-8.23%]). Texas had a dominant influence on the overall results and there were larger increases in southern vs nonsouthern states.

Conclusions: US states that adopted abortion bans had higher than expected infant mortality after the bans took effect. The estimated relative increases in infant mortality were larger for deaths with congenital causes and among groups that had higher than average infant mortality rates at baseline, including Black infants and those in southern states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA, published continuously since 1883, is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信