内镜下早期远端结直肠癌定位的差异:来自单一机构的回顾性队列分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Aiswarya Sukumar, Shafquat Zaman, Omar E S Mostafa, Jamie Patel, Akinfemi Akingboye, Peter Waterland
{"title":"内镜下早期远端结直肠癌定位的差异:来自单一机构的回顾性队列分析。","authors":"Aiswarya Sukumar, Shafquat Zaman, Omar E S Mostafa, Jamie Patel, Akinfemi Akingboye, Peter Waterland","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03642-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate staging of distal colorectal cancers is paramount in guiding neoadjuvant therapy, peri-operative, and ostomy planning. Early colonic lesions can be difficult to visualise on computed tomography (CT) scans, with tumour location solely deduced via endoscopy with the potential for introducing error. We aimed to address the paucity in literature in this area and assessed the accuracy of radiological and endoscopic localisation of distal colorectal cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of an electronic database of patients at a large District General Hospital (DGH) diagnosed with distal colorectal cancer between January 2014 to January 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, investigations, endoscopic, and operative findings were analysed. Outcomes were assessed to determine disparities between pre-operative endoscopy and final tumour location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 212 patients were endoscopically diagnosed with distal sigmoid tumour. Of these, 207 (97.6%) had a CT scan performed with 25.1% (52/207) lesions not being identified on this imaging modality with the remainder (74.9%; 155/207) being reported as visible. 38.2% (79/207) of tumours were in the sigmoid colon, 17.4% (36/207) rectosigmoid, and 19.3% (40/207) in the rectum. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 42.5% (90/212) of cases showing 84 tumours: 6.0% (5/84) sigmoid colon, 9.5% (8/84) rectosigmoid and 83.3% (70/84) rectal cancers (upper: 34, mid-rectum: 26, low: 10), with one anal cancer. 42.3% (22/52) of patients with non-visible lesions on CT had MRI scans: 68.2% (15/22) had rectal cancer (upper: 10, mid-rectum: 4, low: 1). Of the 30 where MRI was not performed, 46.7% (14) had sigmoid cancer, 16.7% (5) rectosigmoid, and 33.3% (10) rectal intraoperatively. Overall, 30.7% (65/212) of patients reported as having a distal sigmoid lesion endoscopically in fact had rectal cancer intra-operatively (rectosigmoid lesions excluded).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic localisation of distal colorectal tumours can be unreliable for accurate staging and operative planning. A pre-operative MRI scan should be considered in such instances, and particularly for non-visible lesions on CT scan. This may improve peri-operative planning, staging accuracy and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparity in endoscopic localisation of early distal colorectal cancers: a retrospective cohort analysis from a single institution.\",\"authors\":\"Aiswarya Sukumar, Shafquat Zaman, Omar E S Mostafa, Jamie Patel, Akinfemi Akingboye, Peter Waterland\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03642-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate staging of distal colorectal cancers is paramount in guiding neoadjuvant therapy, peri-operative, and ostomy planning. Early colonic lesions can be difficult to visualise on computed tomography (CT) scans, with tumour location solely deduced via endoscopy with the potential for introducing error. We aimed to address the paucity in literature in this area and assessed the accuracy of radiological and endoscopic localisation of distal colorectal cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of an electronic database of patients at a large District General Hospital (DGH) diagnosed with distal colorectal cancer between January 2014 to January 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, investigations, endoscopic, and operative findings were analysed. Outcomes were assessed to determine disparities between pre-operative endoscopy and final tumour location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 212 patients were endoscopically diagnosed with distal sigmoid tumour. Of these, 207 (97.6%) had a CT scan performed with 25.1% (52/207) lesions not being identified on this imaging modality with the remainder (74.9%; 155/207) being reported as visible. 38.2% (79/207) of tumours were in the sigmoid colon, 17.4% (36/207) rectosigmoid, and 19.3% (40/207) in the rectum. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 42.5% (90/212) of cases showing 84 tumours: 6.0% (5/84) sigmoid colon, 9.5% (8/84) rectosigmoid and 83.3% (70/84) rectal cancers (upper: 34, mid-rectum: 26, low: 10), with one anal cancer. 42.3% (22/52) of patients with non-visible lesions on CT had MRI scans: 68.2% (15/22) had rectal cancer (upper: 10, mid-rectum: 4, low: 1). Of the 30 where MRI was not performed, 46.7% (14) had sigmoid cancer, 16.7% (5) rectosigmoid, and 33.3% (10) rectal intraoperatively. Overall, 30.7% (65/212) of patients reported as having a distal sigmoid lesion endoscopically in fact had rectal cancer intra-operatively (rectosigmoid lesions excluded).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic localisation of distal colorectal tumours can be unreliable for accurate staging and operative planning. A pre-operative MRI scan should be considered in such instances, and particularly for non-visible lesions on CT scan. This may improve peri-operative planning, staging accuracy and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03642-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03642-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远端结直肠癌的准确分期对指导新辅助治疗、围手术期和造口计划至关重要。早期结肠病变很难在计算机断层扫描(CT)上可视化,肿瘤位置仅通过内窥镜推断,有可能引入错误。我们旨在解决这一领域文献的缺乏,并评估远端结直肠癌放射和内镜定位的准确性。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2023年1月在某大型区综合医院(DGH)诊断为远端结直肠癌患者的电子数据库。分析患者人口统计学、调查、内窥镜检查和手术结果。评估结果以确定术前内镜检查与最终肿瘤位置之间的差异。结果:212例患者经内镜诊断为乙状窦远端肿瘤。其中,207例(97.6%)进行了CT扫描,其中25.1%(52/207)的病变未被这种成像方式识别,其余的(74.9%;155/207)被报告为可见。乙状结肠占38.2%(79/207),直肠乙状结肠占17.4%(36/207),直肠占19.3%(40/207)。84例肿瘤,42.5%(90/212)行术前磁共振成像检查,其中乙状结肠6.0%(5/84),直肠乙状结肠9.5%(8/84),直肠癌83.3%(70/84)(上直肠34例,中直肠26例,低位10例),肛门癌1例。42.3% (22/52) CT上不可见病变的患者行MRI扫描,68.2%(15/22)为直肠癌(上直肠:10,中直肠:4,下直肠:1)。在30例未行MRI的患者中,46.7%(14)为乙状结肠癌,16.7%(5)为直肠乙状结肠癌,33.3%(10)为直肠术中癌。总体而言,30.7%(65/212)的内镜下报告乙状结肠远端病变的患者实际上术中患有直肠癌(排除直肠乙状结肠病变)。结论:内镜下结肠远端肿瘤的定位对于准确的分期和手术计划是不可靠的。在这种情况下,术前应考虑MRI扫描,特别是CT扫描上不可见的病变。这可以改善围手术期计划、分期准确性和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparity in endoscopic localisation of early distal colorectal cancers: a retrospective cohort analysis from a single institution.

Background: Accurate staging of distal colorectal cancers is paramount in guiding neoadjuvant therapy, peri-operative, and ostomy planning. Early colonic lesions can be difficult to visualise on computed tomography (CT) scans, with tumour location solely deduced via endoscopy with the potential for introducing error. We aimed to address the paucity in literature in this area and assessed the accuracy of radiological and endoscopic localisation of distal colorectal cancers.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of an electronic database of patients at a large District General Hospital (DGH) diagnosed with distal colorectal cancer between January 2014 to January 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, investigations, endoscopic, and operative findings were analysed. Outcomes were assessed to determine disparities between pre-operative endoscopy and final tumour location.

Results: A total of 212 patients were endoscopically diagnosed with distal sigmoid tumour. Of these, 207 (97.6%) had a CT scan performed with 25.1% (52/207) lesions not being identified on this imaging modality with the remainder (74.9%; 155/207) being reported as visible. 38.2% (79/207) of tumours were in the sigmoid colon, 17.4% (36/207) rectosigmoid, and 19.3% (40/207) in the rectum. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 42.5% (90/212) of cases showing 84 tumours: 6.0% (5/84) sigmoid colon, 9.5% (8/84) rectosigmoid and 83.3% (70/84) rectal cancers (upper: 34, mid-rectum: 26, low: 10), with one anal cancer. 42.3% (22/52) of patients with non-visible lesions on CT had MRI scans: 68.2% (15/22) had rectal cancer (upper: 10, mid-rectum: 4, low: 1). Of the 30 where MRI was not performed, 46.7% (14) had sigmoid cancer, 16.7% (5) rectosigmoid, and 33.3% (10) rectal intraoperatively. Overall, 30.7% (65/212) of patients reported as having a distal sigmoid lesion endoscopically in fact had rectal cancer intra-operatively (rectosigmoid lesions excluded).

Conclusion: Endoscopic localisation of distal colorectal tumours can be unreliable for accurate staging and operative planning. A pre-operative MRI scan should be considered in such instances, and particularly for non-visible lesions on CT scan. This may improve peri-operative planning, staging accuracy and patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信