髋关节手术患者的功能结局:一项随机对照研究:囊包神经组(PENG)阻滞与腹股沟上髂筋膜(SIFI)阻滞

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_838_24
Tanusha Saini, Meenakshi Aggarwal, Udeyana Singh, Mirley Rupinder Singh
{"title":"髋关节手术患者的功能结局:一项随机对照研究:囊包神经组(PENG)阻滞与腹股沟上髂筋膜(SIFI)阻滞","authors":"Tanusha Saini, Meenakshi Aggarwal, Udeyana Singh, Mirley Rupinder Singh","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_838_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>In hip surgeries, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block are commonly employed perioperative regional analgesia techniques. This study aimed to compare functional outcomes regarding quadriceps muscle strength and weight-bearing capacity between PENG and SIFI blocks after hip surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre, double-blinded, randomised trial, 60 patients undergoing hip surgeries under subarachnoid block were randomised into either Group P (PENG block) or Group S (SIFI block). Blocks were administered under ultrasound guidance with 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone. Functional mobility was assessed 24 and 48 h postoperatively by measuring quadriceps strength and maximum weight-bearing capacity. Analgesic efficacy was also evaluated by comparing visual analogue score (VAS) scores at 24 h, total opioid consumption over 24 h, and duration of analgesia. Statistical analysis included Student's <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square, and Z-test as appropriate, with statistical significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group P demonstrated significantly higher quadriceps-muscle strength at 24 h (<i>P</i> = 0.025) and 48 h (<i>P</i> = 0.002) post surgery. More patients in Group P achieved superior weight-bearing grades at 24 h (<i>P</i> = 0.002) post surgery compared to Group S. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group P at 24 h post surgery (<i>P</i> = 0.006). Group P also showed a prolonged duration of analgesia (<i>P</i> = 0.019) and lower mean opioid consumption (<i>P</i> = 0.001) compared to Group S.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PENG block may be superior to the SIFI block in terms of functional outcomes with better quadriceps strength, enhanced weight-bearing, and provision of more effective postoperative analgesia in hip surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 12","pages":"1043-1048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block for functional outcome in patients undergoing hip surgeries - A randomised controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Tanusha Saini, Meenakshi Aggarwal, Udeyana Singh, Mirley Rupinder Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_838_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>In hip surgeries, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block are commonly employed perioperative regional analgesia techniques. This study aimed to compare functional outcomes regarding quadriceps muscle strength and weight-bearing capacity between PENG and SIFI blocks after hip surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre, double-blinded, randomised trial, 60 patients undergoing hip surgeries under subarachnoid block were randomised into either Group P (PENG block) or Group S (SIFI block). Blocks were administered under ultrasound guidance with 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone. Functional mobility was assessed 24 and 48 h postoperatively by measuring quadriceps strength and maximum weight-bearing capacity. Analgesic efficacy was also evaluated by comparing visual analogue score (VAS) scores at 24 h, total opioid consumption over 24 h, and duration of analgesia. Statistical analysis included Student's <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square, and Z-test as appropriate, with statistical significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group P demonstrated significantly higher quadriceps-muscle strength at 24 h (<i>P</i> = 0.025) and 48 h (<i>P</i> = 0.002) post surgery. More patients in Group P achieved superior weight-bearing grades at 24 h (<i>P</i> = 0.002) post surgery compared to Group S. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group P at 24 h post surgery (<i>P</i> = 0.006). Group P also showed a prolonged duration of analgesia (<i>P</i> = 0.019) and lower mean opioid consumption (<i>P</i> = 0.001) compared to Group S.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PENG block may be superior to the SIFI block in terms of functional outcomes with better quadriceps strength, enhanced weight-bearing, and provision of more effective postoperative analgesia in hip surgery patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"68 12\",\"pages\":\"1043-1048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_838_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_838_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:在髋关节手术中,围手术期常用的区域镇痛技术是囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞和腹股沟上髂筋膜(SIFI)阻滞。本研究旨在比较髋关节手术后PENG和SIFI阻滞对股四头肌力量和负重能力的功能结果。方法:在这项单中心、双盲、随机试验中,60例在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下接受髋关节手术的患者被随机分为P组(PENG组)和S组(SIFI组)。在超声引导下,用0.2%罗哌卡因30 mL和地塞米松4 mg给药。术后24和48小时通过测量股四头肌力量和最大负重能力来评估功能活动能力。通过比较24 h视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、24 h阿片类药物总消耗和镇痛持续时间来评价镇痛效果。统计分析酌情采用t检验、卡方检验和z检验,P < 0.05为统计学显著性。结果:P组术后24 h (P = 0.025)和48 h (P = 0.002)股四头肌力量明显增高。术后24 h, P组患者的负重评分高于s组(P = 0.002)。术后24 h, P组患者的VAS评分明显低于s组(P = 0.006)。与s组相比,P组镇痛持续时间更长(P = 0.019),平均阿片类药物消耗更低(P = 0.001)。结论:在功能结局方面,PENG阻滞可能优于SIFI阻滞,股四头肌力量更好,负重增强,并为髋关节手术患者提供更有效的术后镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block for functional outcome in patients undergoing hip surgeries - A randomised controlled study.

Background and aims: In hip surgeries, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block are commonly employed perioperative regional analgesia techniques. This study aimed to compare functional outcomes regarding quadriceps muscle strength and weight-bearing capacity between PENG and SIFI blocks after hip surgery.

Methods: In this single-centre, double-blinded, randomised trial, 60 patients undergoing hip surgeries under subarachnoid block were randomised into either Group P (PENG block) or Group S (SIFI block). Blocks were administered under ultrasound guidance with 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone. Functional mobility was assessed 24 and 48 h postoperatively by measuring quadriceps strength and maximum weight-bearing capacity. Analgesic efficacy was also evaluated by comparing visual analogue score (VAS) scores at 24 h, total opioid consumption over 24 h, and duration of analgesia. Statistical analysis included Student's t-test, Chi-square, and Z-test as appropriate, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: Group P demonstrated significantly higher quadriceps-muscle strength at 24 h (P = 0.025) and 48 h (P = 0.002) post surgery. More patients in Group P achieved superior weight-bearing grades at 24 h (P = 0.002) post surgery compared to Group S. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group P at 24 h post surgery (P = 0.006). Group P also showed a prolonged duration of analgesia (P = 0.019) and lower mean opioid consumption (P = 0.001) compared to Group S.

Conclusion: The PENG block may be superior to the SIFI block in terms of functional outcomes with better quadriceps strength, enhanced weight-bearing, and provision of more effective postoperative analgesia in hip surgery patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信