局部麻醉股动脉周围注射与皮下浸润联合股神经和坐骨神经阻滞降低全身麻醉下下肢手术中大腿止血带引起的高血压的疗效:一项随机对照双盲试验。

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_968_24
Chonruethai Tangkittithaworn, Wirinaree Kampitak, Tanawat Benjamungkalarak, Jirun Apinun
{"title":"局部麻醉股动脉周围注射与皮下浸润联合股神经和坐骨神经阻滞降低全身麻醉下下肢手术中大腿止血带引起的高血压的疗效:一项随机对照双盲试验。","authors":"Chonruethai Tangkittithaworn, Wirinaree Kampitak, Tanawat Benjamungkalarak, Jirun Apinun","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_968_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Tourniquet-induced hypertension (TH) remains an unresolved issue. Various techniques, such as peripheral nerve blocks, peri-femoral artery blocks, and subcutaneous infiltration, have been explored to address this. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of TH during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia between peri-femoral artery block and subcutaneous infiltration, combined with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. Secondary objectives included intraoperative intravenous fentanyl and antihypertensive uses, as well as postoperative pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial involved 58 patients scheduled for elective lower-limb surgery. Participants were assigned to the peri-femoral artery block (P-FAB) or subcutaneous infiltration (SI) groups. All patients received general anaesthesia alongside femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. TH was defined as a 30% increase in systolic blood pressure from baseline. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale in the post-anaesthetic care unit and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h post-surgery. Unpaired <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis. A <i>P</i> value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the incidence of TH between the P-FAB and SI groups (<i>P</i> = 1.00). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in intraoperative fentanyl (<i>P</i> = 0.459) or antihypertensive use (<i>P</i> = 0.992). Pain scores across all measured aspects, including thigh and incision sites, were also not significantly different between groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In lower-limb surgery, adding a peri-femoral artery block to general anaesthesia with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks did not reduce the incidence of TH compared to subcutaneous infiltration.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 12","pages":"1035-1042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of local anaesthetic peri-femoral artery injection compared to subcutaneous infiltration in combination with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for reducing thigh tourniquet-induced hypertension during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled double-blinded trial.\",\"authors\":\"Chonruethai Tangkittithaworn, Wirinaree Kampitak, Tanawat Benjamungkalarak, Jirun Apinun\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_968_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Tourniquet-induced hypertension (TH) remains an unresolved issue. Various techniques, such as peripheral nerve blocks, peri-femoral artery blocks, and subcutaneous infiltration, have been explored to address this. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of TH during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia between peri-femoral artery block and subcutaneous infiltration, combined with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. Secondary objectives included intraoperative intravenous fentanyl and antihypertensive uses, as well as postoperative pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial involved 58 patients scheduled for elective lower-limb surgery. Participants were assigned to the peri-femoral artery block (P-FAB) or subcutaneous infiltration (SI) groups. All patients received general anaesthesia alongside femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. TH was defined as a 30% increase in systolic blood pressure from baseline. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale in the post-anaesthetic care unit and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h post-surgery. Unpaired <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis. A <i>P</i> value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the incidence of TH between the P-FAB and SI groups (<i>P</i> = 1.00). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in intraoperative fentanyl (<i>P</i> = 0.459) or antihypertensive use (<i>P</i> = 0.992). Pain scores across all measured aspects, including thigh and incision sites, were also not significantly different between groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In lower-limb surgery, adding a peri-femoral artery block to general anaesthesia with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks did not reduce the incidence of TH compared to subcutaneous infiltration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"68 12\",\"pages\":\"1035-1042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_968_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_968_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:止血带引起的高血压(TH)仍然是一个未解决的问题。各种技术,如周围神经阻滞,股动脉周围阻滞和皮下浸润,已经被探索来解决这个问题。主要目的是比较全身麻醉下下肢手术中股周动脉阻滞和皮下浸润联合股神经和坐骨神经阻滞的TH发生率。次要目的包括术中静脉注射芬太尼和抗高血压的使用,以及术后疼痛评分。方法:这项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验纳入了58例计划择期下肢手术的患者。参与者被分为股周动脉阻滞组(P-FAB)和皮下浸润组(SI)。所有患者均行全身麻醉,同时行股神经和坐骨神经阻滞。TH的定义是收缩压比基线升高30%。在麻醉后护理单元以及术后4、8、12和24小时采用数值评定量表对疼痛进行评估。采用非配对t检验、卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行分析。P值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:P- fab组与SI组间TH的发生率无显著差异(P = 1.00)。同样,术中芬太尼(P = 0.459)和抗高血压药物(P = 0.992)的使用也无显著差异。两组间包括大腿和切口部位在内的所有测量方面的疼痛评分也无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:在下肢手术中,与皮下浸润相比,在全身麻醉与股神经和坐骨神经阻滞的基础上增加股动脉周围阻滞并不能降低TH的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of local anaesthetic peri-femoral artery injection compared to subcutaneous infiltration in combination with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for reducing thigh tourniquet-induced hypertension during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled double-blinded trial.

Background and aims: Tourniquet-induced hypertension (TH) remains an unresolved issue. Various techniques, such as peripheral nerve blocks, peri-femoral artery blocks, and subcutaneous infiltration, have been explored to address this. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of TH during lower-limb surgery under general anaesthesia between peri-femoral artery block and subcutaneous infiltration, combined with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. Secondary objectives included intraoperative intravenous fentanyl and antihypertensive uses, as well as postoperative pain scores.

Methods: This single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial involved 58 patients scheduled for elective lower-limb surgery. Participants were assigned to the peri-femoral artery block (P-FAB) or subcutaneous infiltration (SI) groups. All patients received general anaesthesia alongside femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. TH was defined as a 30% increase in systolic blood pressure from baseline. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale in the post-anaesthetic care unit and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h post-surgery. Unpaired t-test, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: There were no significant differences in the incidence of TH between the P-FAB and SI groups (P = 1.00). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in intraoperative fentanyl (P = 0.459) or antihypertensive use (P = 0.992). Pain scores across all measured aspects, including thigh and incision sites, were also not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: In lower-limb surgery, adding a peri-femoral artery block to general anaesthesia with femoral and sciatic nerve blocks did not reduce the incidence of TH compared to subcutaneous infiltration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信