从前瞻性评估到实践:肿瘤中基于模型的剂量优化。

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s40265-025-02152-6
Bram C Agema, Birgit C P Koch, Ron H J Mathijssen, Stijn L W Koolen
{"title":"从前瞻性评估到实践:肿瘤中基于模型的剂量优化。","authors":"Bram C Agema, Birgit C P Koch, Ron H J Mathijssen, Stijn L W Koolen","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02152-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One dose does not fit all, especially in oncolytic drugs, where side effects and therapy failures highlight the need for personalized dosing approaches. In recent years, the quest to apply model-informed precision dosing to oncology drugs has gained significant momentum, reflecting its potential to revolutionize patient care by tailoring treatments to individual pharmacokinetic profiles. Despite this progress, model-informed precision dosing has not (yet) become widely integrated into routine clinical care. We aimed to explain model-informed precision dosing from a clinical viewpoint while addressing all prospective model-informed precision dosing implementation and validation studies in the field of oncology. We identified 16 different drugs for which prospective model-informed precision dosing validation/implementation has been performed. Although these studies are mostly focused on attaining adequate drug exposures and reducing inter-individual variability, improved clinical outcomes after performing model-informed precision dosing were shown for busulfan, and high-dose methotrexate. Toxicities were significantly reduced for busulfan and cyclophosphamide treatment. In contrast, for carboplatin, for which model-informed precision dosing has been used in the Calvert formula, no prospective validation on outcomes was deemed necessary as the therapeutic window had been extensively validated. Model-informed precision dosing has shown to be of added value in oncology and is expected to significantly change dosing regimens in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"487-503"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Prospective Evaluation to Practice: Model-Informed Dose Optimization in Oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Bram C Agema, Birgit C P Koch, Ron H J Mathijssen, Stijn L W Koolen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40265-025-02152-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One dose does not fit all, especially in oncolytic drugs, where side effects and therapy failures highlight the need for personalized dosing approaches. In recent years, the quest to apply model-informed precision dosing to oncology drugs has gained significant momentum, reflecting its potential to revolutionize patient care by tailoring treatments to individual pharmacokinetic profiles. Despite this progress, model-informed precision dosing has not (yet) become widely integrated into routine clinical care. We aimed to explain model-informed precision dosing from a clinical viewpoint while addressing all prospective model-informed precision dosing implementation and validation studies in the field of oncology. We identified 16 different drugs for which prospective model-informed precision dosing validation/implementation has been performed. Although these studies are mostly focused on attaining adequate drug exposures and reducing inter-individual variability, improved clinical outcomes after performing model-informed precision dosing were shown for busulfan, and high-dose methotrexate. Toxicities were significantly reduced for busulfan and cyclophosphamide treatment. In contrast, for carboplatin, for which model-informed precision dosing has been used in the Calvert formula, no prospective validation on outcomes was deemed necessary as the therapeutic window had been extensively validated. Model-informed precision dosing has shown to be of added value in oncology and is expected to significantly change dosing regimens in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"487-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946950/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-025-02152-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-025-02152-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个剂量并不适合所有人,特别是在溶瘤药物中,副作用和治疗失败突出了个性化给药方法的必要性。近年来,将基于模型的精确给药应用于肿瘤药物的研究取得了显著的进展,这反映了它通过根据个体药代动力学特征定制治疗方案来彻底改变患者护理的潜力。尽管取得了这一进展,但基于模型的精确给药还没有被广泛地整合到常规临床护理中。我们的目的是从临床角度解释模型信息精确给药,同时解决肿瘤领域所有前瞻性模型信息精确给药的实施和验证研究。我们确定了16种不同的药物,这些药物已经进行了前瞻性模型信息精确剂量验证/实施。虽然这些研究主要集中在获得足够的药物暴露和减少个体间的差异,但在执行模型信息的精确给药后,布硫芬和大剂量甲氨蝶呤的临床结果得到改善。丁硫凡和环磷酰胺治疗的毒性显著降低。相比之下,对于卡铂,在Calvert公式中使用了基于模型的精确给药,由于治疗窗口已被广泛验证,因此没有必要对结果进行前瞻性验证。基于模型的精确给药已被证明在肿瘤学中具有附加价值,并有望在未来显著改变给药方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Prospective Evaluation to Practice: Model-Informed Dose Optimization in Oncology.

One dose does not fit all, especially in oncolytic drugs, where side effects and therapy failures highlight the need for personalized dosing approaches. In recent years, the quest to apply model-informed precision dosing to oncology drugs has gained significant momentum, reflecting its potential to revolutionize patient care by tailoring treatments to individual pharmacokinetic profiles. Despite this progress, model-informed precision dosing has not (yet) become widely integrated into routine clinical care. We aimed to explain model-informed precision dosing from a clinical viewpoint while addressing all prospective model-informed precision dosing implementation and validation studies in the field of oncology. We identified 16 different drugs for which prospective model-informed precision dosing validation/implementation has been performed. Although these studies are mostly focused on attaining adequate drug exposures and reducing inter-individual variability, improved clinical outcomes after performing model-informed precision dosing were shown for busulfan, and high-dose methotrexate. Toxicities were significantly reduced for busulfan and cyclophosphamide treatment. In contrast, for carboplatin, for which model-informed precision dosing has been used in the Calvert formula, no prospective validation on outcomes was deemed necessary as the therapeutic window had been extensively validated. Model-informed precision dosing has shown to be of added value in oncology and is expected to significantly change dosing regimens in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs
Drugs 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
134
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs is a journal that aims to enhance pharmacotherapy by publishing review and original research articles on key aspects of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. The journal includes: Leading/current opinion articles providing an overview of contentious or emerging issues. Definitive reviews of drugs and drug classes, and their place in disease management. Therapy in Practice articles including recommendations for specific clinical situations. High-quality, well designed, original clinical research. Adis Drug Evaluations reviewing the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs. AdisInsight Reports summarising development at first global approval. Moreover, the journal offers additional digital features such as animated abstracts, video abstracts, instructional videos, and podcasts to increase visibility and educational value. Plain language summaries accompany articles to assist readers with some knowledge of the field in understanding important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信