Xinyu Cao, Guangli Zhu, Chongya Yang, Bin Wang, Yang Ang, Kangli Hui, Jingwei Xiong, Jiejie Zhou, Qiang Sun, Manlin Duan
{"title":"静脉注射利多卡因对无痛胃肠内镜患者环丙酚剂量的影响:一项双盲、随机、对照试验。","authors":"Xinyu Cao, Guangli Zhu, Chongya Yang, Bin Wang, Yang Ang, Kangli Hui, Jingwei Xiong, Jiejie Zhou, Qiang Sun, Manlin Duan","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02934-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ciprofol (CIP) for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy (GE) can cause respiratory or cardiovascular complications. The literature suggests that intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion can alleviate visceral pain and enhance humans' ventilator response to CO<sub>2</sub>. Therefore, it was hypothesized that IV lidocaine could reduce the CIP dose for painless GE and improve recovery time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized placebo-controlled trial included 40 patients undergoing GE. After CIP titration for unconsciousness, patients in group L were given IV lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg bolus dose, then a 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion); the same volume saline as placebo was given for N group patients. The primary endpoint was the required CIP dose. Secondary endpoints were: endoscopic examination time, awakening time, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time, pain and fatigue after awakening, adverse events, and endoscopist's and patient's satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both cohorts had comparable demographic characteristics. Group L's CIP consumption was decreased by 23.0% than the N group (47.38 ± 7.45 mg vs. 61.50 ± 9.44 mg, respectively, p < 0.001). Awakening time (P=0.002), PACU discharge time (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.008), and fatigue (P = 0.004) after awakening were also reduced in group L. Furthermore, group L had higher satisfaction scores than group N (P = 0.017). No marked difference was identified in the incidence of unfavorable effects (P > 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lidocaine IV infusion caused a 23.0% reduction in CIP requirements during GE. Furthermore, post-endoscopic pain and fatigue were also improved, thus suggesting that lidocaine is an efficient therapeutic option.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial has been submitted to the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300069868, registration date: 28/03/2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of intravenous lidocaine on Ciprofol dose in patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Cao, Guangli Zhu, Chongya Yang, Bin Wang, Yang Ang, Kangli Hui, Jingwei Xiong, Jiejie Zhou, Qiang Sun, Manlin Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-02934-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ciprofol (CIP) for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy (GE) can cause respiratory or cardiovascular complications. The literature suggests that intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion can alleviate visceral pain and enhance humans' ventilator response to CO<sub>2</sub>. Therefore, it was hypothesized that IV lidocaine could reduce the CIP dose for painless GE and improve recovery time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized placebo-controlled trial included 40 patients undergoing GE. After CIP titration for unconsciousness, patients in group L were given IV lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg bolus dose, then a 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion); the same volume saline as placebo was given for N group patients. The primary endpoint was the required CIP dose. Secondary endpoints were: endoscopic examination time, awakening time, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time, pain and fatigue after awakening, adverse events, and endoscopist's and patient's satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both cohorts had comparable demographic characteristics. Group L's CIP consumption was decreased by 23.0% than the N group (47.38 ± 7.45 mg vs. 61.50 ± 9.44 mg, respectively, p < 0.001). Awakening time (P=0.002), PACU discharge time (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.008), and fatigue (P = 0.004) after awakening were also reduced in group L. Furthermore, group L had higher satisfaction scores than group N (P = 0.017). No marked difference was identified in the incidence of unfavorable effects (P > 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lidocaine IV infusion caused a 23.0% reduction in CIP requirements during GE. Furthermore, post-endoscopic pain and fatigue were also improved, thus suggesting that lidocaine is an efficient therapeutic option.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial has been submitted to the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300069868, registration date: 28/03/2023).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02934-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02934-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:环丙酚(CIP)用于无痛胃肠内镜(GE)手术镇静镇痛(PSA)可引起呼吸或心血管并发症。文献提示,静脉输注利多卡因可以缓解内脏疼痛,增强人类呼吸机对CO2的反应。因此,我们假设静脉注射利多卡因可以减少无痛性GE的CIP剂量,并缩短恢复时间。方法:这项随机安慰剂对照试验包括40例接受GE治疗的患者。L组患者经CIP滴定治疗意识不清后,给予静脉注射利多卡因(先给药1.5 mg/kg,再连续输注2 mg/kg/h);N组患者给予与安慰剂等量的生理盐水。主要终点是所需的CIP剂量。次要终点为:内镜检查时间、苏醒时间、麻醉后护理单位(PACU)出院时间、苏醒后疼痛和疲劳、不良事件、内镜医师和患者满意度。结果:两个队列具有可比的人口统计学特征。L组的CIP消耗量比N组减少23.0%(分别为47.38±7.45 mg和61.50±9.44 mg, p < 0.05)。结论:静脉输注利多卡因使GE期间CIP需氧量降低23.0%。此外,内镜后疼痛和疲劳也得到改善,这表明利多卡因是一种有效的治疗选择。试验注册:本试验已提交中国临床试验注册中心(注册号:ChiCTR2300069868,注册日期:28/03/2023)。
Effect of intravenous lidocaine on Ciprofol dose in patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
Background: Ciprofol (CIP) for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy (GE) can cause respiratory or cardiovascular complications. The literature suggests that intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion can alleviate visceral pain and enhance humans' ventilator response to CO2. Therefore, it was hypothesized that IV lidocaine could reduce the CIP dose for painless GE and improve recovery time.
Methods: This randomized placebo-controlled trial included 40 patients undergoing GE. After CIP titration for unconsciousness, patients in group L were given IV lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg bolus dose, then a 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion); the same volume saline as placebo was given for N group patients. The primary endpoint was the required CIP dose. Secondary endpoints were: endoscopic examination time, awakening time, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time, pain and fatigue after awakening, adverse events, and endoscopist's and patient's satisfaction.
Results: Both cohorts had comparable demographic characteristics. Group L's CIP consumption was decreased by 23.0% than the N group (47.38 ± 7.45 mg vs. 61.50 ± 9.44 mg, respectively, p < 0.001). Awakening time (P=0.002), PACU discharge time (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.008), and fatigue (P = 0.004) after awakening were also reduced in group L. Furthermore, group L had higher satisfaction scores than group N (P = 0.017). No marked difference was identified in the incidence of unfavorable effects (P > 0.05 for all).
Conclusions: Lidocaine IV infusion caused a 23.0% reduction in CIP requirements during GE. Furthermore, post-endoscopic pain and fatigue were also improved, thus suggesting that lidocaine is an efficient therapeutic option.
Trial registration: This trial has been submitted to the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300069868, registration date: 28/03/2023).
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.