细胞遗传学和分子风险驱动的调节强度在急性髓系白血病患者接受干细胞移植后环磷酰胺:一项来自EBMT急性白血病工作组的研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Jaime Sanz, Myriam Labopin, Jurjen Versluis, Didier Blaise, Lorenzo Lazzari, Juan Montoro, Gwendolyn Van Gorkom, Peter von dem Borne, Loron Sandrine, Montserrat Rovira, Péter Reményi, Patrice Chevallier, Mi Kwon, Matthias Eder, Jan Vydra, Eolia Brissot, Alexandros Spyridonidis, Simona Piemontese, Mohamad Mohty, Fabio Ciceri
{"title":"细胞遗传学和分子风险驱动的调节强度在急性髓系白血病患者接受干细胞移植后环磷酰胺:一项来自EBMT急性白血病工作组的研究。","authors":"Jaime Sanz, Myriam Labopin, Jurjen Versluis, Didier Blaise, Lorenzo Lazzari, Juan Montoro, Gwendolyn Van Gorkom, Peter von dem Borne, Loron Sandrine, Montserrat Rovira, Péter Reményi, Patrice Chevallier, Mi Kwon, Matthias Eder, Jan Vydra, Eolia Brissot, Alexandros Spyridonidis, Simona Piemontese, Mohamad Mohty, Fabio Ciceri","doi":"10.1038/s41409-025-02527-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We retrospectively analyzed the impact of conditioning intensity on transplant outcomes according to their cytogenetic/molecular risk in a cohort of 1823 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and intermediate- or adverse-risk cytogenetics in first complete remission (CR1). These patients received their first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The intermediate-risk cytogenetic group included 1386 (76%) patients, and 608 (34%) had mutated FLT3-ITD. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 930 patients (51%), while 1130 (62%) received an intensified conditioning (score ≥2.5) based on the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score. Conditioning intensity using the myeloablative/reduced intensity stratification did not impact transplant outcomes across the entire cohort. However, a higher TCI score was associated with a lower risk of relapse, with no effect on survival. In specific cytogenetic risk groups, a higher TCI score did not influence outcomes in the adverse-risk group. In the intermediate-risk group, the impact varied with FLT3-ITD status. Patients with FLT3-ITD mutation who received a higher TCI showed a beneficial effect on relapse, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival. Conversely, in FLT3-ITD wild-type patients, more intense conditioning had a detrimental effect on graft-versus-host disease-free, and relapse-free survival with no effect on other outcomes. In conclusion, for AML patients in CR1 undergoing HSCT with PTCy, it is crucial to consider cytogenetic risk and molecular status when selecting the conditioning regimen. Intensive conditioning should be considered for patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and mutated FLT3-ITD but should probably be avoided for those with wild-type FLT3-ITD.","PeriodicalId":9126,"journal":{"name":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","volume":"60 4","pages":"529-534"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-025-02527-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytogenetic and molecular risk-driven conditioning intensity in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide: a study from the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Sanz, Myriam Labopin, Jurjen Versluis, Didier Blaise, Lorenzo Lazzari, Juan Montoro, Gwendolyn Van Gorkom, Peter von dem Borne, Loron Sandrine, Montserrat Rovira, Péter Reményi, Patrice Chevallier, Mi Kwon, Matthias Eder, Jan Vydra, Eolia Brissot, Alexandros Spyridonidis, Simona Piemontese, Mohamad Mohty, Fabio Ciceri\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41409-025-02527-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We retrospectively analyzed the impact of conditioning intensity on transplant outcomes according to their cytogenetic/molecular risk in a cohort of 1823 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and intermediate- or adverse-risk cytogenetics in first complete remission (CR1). These patients received their first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The intermediate-risk cytogenetic group included 1386 (76%) patients, and 608 (34%) had mutated FLT3-ITD. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 930 patients (51%), while 1130 (62%) received an intensified conditioning (score ≥2.5) based on the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score. Conditioning intensity using the myeloablative/reduced intensity stratification did not impact transplant outcomes across the entire cohort. However, a higher TCI score was associated with a lower risk of relapse, with no effect on survival. In specific cytogenetic risk groups, a higher TCI score did not influence outcomes in the adverse-risk group. In the intermediate-risk group, the impact varied with FLT3-ITD status. Patients with FLT3-ITD mutation who received a higher TCI showed a beneficial effect on relapse, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival. Conversely, in FLT3-ITD wild-type patients, more intense conditioning had a detrimental effect on graft-versus-host disease-free, and relapse-free survival with no effect on other outcomes. In conclusion, for AML patients in CR1 undergoing HSCT with PTCy, it is crucial to consider cytogenetic risk and molecular status when selecting the conditioning regimen. Intensive conditioning should be considered for patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and mutated FLT3-ITD but should probably be avoided for those with wild-type FLT3-ITD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone Marrow Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"529-534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-025-02527-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone Marrow Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-025-02527-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41409-025-02527-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们回顾性分析了1823例首次完全缓解(CR1)的急性髓性白血病(AML)和中度或不良风险细胞遗传学患者,根据其细胞遗传学/分子风险,调节强度对移植结果的影响。这些患者接受了移植后使用环磷酰胺(PTCy)的首次造血干细胞移植(HSCT)。中危细胞遗传学组包括1386例(76%)患者,其中608例(34%)发生FLT3-ITD突变。930例(51%)患者接受了骨髓清除调节,1130例(62%)患者接受了基于移植调节强度(TCI)评分≥2.5的强化调节。使用清髓/降低强度分层的调节强度对整个队列的移植结果没有影响。然而,较高的TCI评分与较低的复发风险相关,对生存没有影响。在特定的细胞遗传学风险组中,较高的TCI评分不影响不良风险组的结果。在中危组,影响随FLT3-ITD状态的不同而不同。接受较高TCI的FLT3-ITD突变患者对复发、无白血病生存期(LFS)和总生存期均有有益影响。相反,在FLT3-ITD野生型患者中,更强的调节对无移植物抗宿主病和无复发生存有不利影响,对其他结局没有影响。总之,对于接受HSCT合并PTCy的CR1 AML患者,在选择调节方案时考虑细胞遗传学风险和分子状态至关重要。对于中等风险细胞遗传学和突变FLT3-ITD患者应考虑强化调理,但对于野生型FLT3-ITD患者应避免强化调理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cytogenetic and molecular risk-driven conditioning intensity in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide: a study from the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT

Cytogenetic and molecular risk-driven conditioning intensity in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide: a study from the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT
We retrospectively analyzed the impact of conditioning intensity on transplant outcomes according to their cytogenetic/molecular risk in a cohort of 1823 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and intermediate- or adverse-risk cytogenetics in first complete remission (CR1). These patients received their first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The intermediate-risk cytogenetic group included 1386 (76%) patients, and 608 (34%) had mutated FLT3-ITD. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 930 patients (51%), while 1130 (62%) received an intensified conditioning (score ≥2.5) based on the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score. Conditioning intensity using the myeloablative/reduced intensity stratification did not impact transplant outcomes across the entire cohort. However, a higher TCI score was associated with a lower risk of relapse, with no effect on survival. In specific cytogenetic risk groups, a higher TCI score did not influence outcomes in the adverse-risk group. In the intermediate-risk group, the impact varied with FLT3-ITD status. Patients with FLT3-ITD mutation who received a higher TCI showed a beneficial effect on relapse, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival. Conversely, in FLT3-ITD wild-type patients, more intense conditioning had a detrimental effect on graft-versus-host disease-free, and relapse-free survival with no effect on other outcomes. In conclusion, for AML patients in CR1 undergoing HSCT with PTCy, it is crucial to consider cytogenetic risk and molecular status when selecting the conditioning regimen. Intensive conditioning should be considered for patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and mutated FLT3-ITD but should probably be avoided for those with wild-type FLT3-ITD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Bone Marrow Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
337
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes high quality, peer reviewed original research that addresses all aspects of basic biology and clinical use of haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. The broad scope of the journal thus encompasses topics such as stem cell biology, e.g., kinetics and cytokine control, transplantation immunology e.g., HLA and matching techniques, translational research, and clinical results of specific transplant protocols. Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes 24 issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信