通过教育和激励麻醉师使用挥发效率比来提高全身麻醉时七氟醚的输送效率。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1177/0310057X241296574
Samuel T Costello, Blake J Vorias, Roman Kluger
{"title":"通过教育和激励麻醉师使用挥发效率比来提高全身麻醉时七氟醚的输送效率。","authors":"Samuel T Costello, Blake J Vorias, Roman Kluger","doi":"10.1177/0310057X241296574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volatile anaesthetic agents such as sevoflurane contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, and selecting low fresh gas flows on anaesthetic machines minimises their waste. Facilitating improvements in sevoflurane use requires the education, motivation, and standardised evaluation of anaesthetists. There is currently no standard of practice related to the efficiency of anaesthetic gas delivery per case. We conducted a multi-component study termed 'Low With The Flow' (LWTF) to directly address these requirements by educating and motivating anaesthetists to reduce fresh gas flow and thereby sevoflurane use. We introduced a novel metric, the 'volatile efficiency ratio' (VER), able to be calculated on Draeger Primus™, the Draeger Atlan™ family and Draeger Perseus A500™ machines, to audit sevoflurane use in a case-by-case fashion, and assess whether the intervention could achieve a set VER target. The LWTF intervention significantly improved the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery (VER 0.46 pre-intervention (<i>n</i> = 518) versus VER 0.57 post-intervention (<i>n</i> = 531), 95% confidence interval 0.092 to 0.129, <i>P < </i>0.0001) resulting in a calculated average of 1.3 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions reduction and approximately AUD 3.50 saving per case. Consequently, the financial and environmental outcomes from sevoflurane delivery were considerably reduced. Our LWTF intervention provides a valuable model for other anaesthetic departments to investigate and address the global environmental and financial burdens related to their volatile anaesthetic use. For anaesthetists using anaesthesia machines that do not facilitate calculation of VER, an approach using components of our LWTF intervention may still reduce the environmental and financial impacts associated with administration of volatile anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"161-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery during general anaesthesia by educating and motivating anaesthetists to utilise the Volatile Efficiency Ratio.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel T Costello, Blake J Vorias, Roman Kluger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0310057X241296574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Volatile anaesthetic agents such as sevoflurane contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, and selecting low fresh gas flows on anaesthetic machines minimises their waste. Facilitating improvements in sevoflurane use requires the education, motivation, and standardised evaluation of anaesthetists. There is currently no standard of practice related to the efficiency of anaesthetic gas delivery per case. We conducted a multi-component study termed 'Low With The Flow' (LWTF) to directly address these requirements by educating and motivating anaesthetists to reduce fresh gas flow and thereby sevoflurane use. We introduced a novel metric, the 'volatile efficiency ratio' (VER), able to be calculated on Draeger Primus™, the Draeger Atlan™ family and Draeger Perseus A500™ machines, to audit sevoflurane use in a case-by-case fashion, and assess whether the intervention could achieve a set VER target. The LWTF intervention significantly improved the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery (VER 0.46 pre-intervention (<i>n</i> = 518) versus VER 0.57 post-intervention (<i>n</i> = 531), 95% confidence interval 0.092 to 0.129, <i>P < </i>0.0001) resulting in a calculated average of 1.3 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions reduction and approximately AUD 3.50 saving per case. Consequently, the financial and environmental outcomes from sevoflurane delivery were considerably reduced. Our LWTF intervention provides a valuable model for other anaesthetic departments to investigate and address the global environmental and financial burdens related to their volatile anaesthetic use. For anaesthetists using anaesthesia machines that do not facilitate calculation of VER, an approach using components of our LWTF intervention may still reduce the environmental and financial impacts associated with administration of volatile anaesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"161-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X241296574\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X241296574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

挥发性麻醉剂如七氟醚会导致温室气体排放,在麻醉机上选择低新鲜气体流量可以最大限度地减少浪费。促进七氟醚使用的改进需要对麻醉师进行教育、激励和标准化评估。目前还没有关于每例麻醉气体输送效率的实践标准。我们进行了一项名为“低流量”(LWTF)的多组分研究,通过教育和激励麻醉师减少新鲜气体流量,从而减少七氟醚的使用,直接解决了这些要求。我们引入了一种新的指标,即“挥发效率比”(VER),可以在Draeger Primus™、Draeger Atlan™系列和Draeger Perseus A500™机器上计算,以具体情况审计七氟醚的使用情况,并评估干预措施是否可以达到设定的VER目标。LWTF干预显着提高了七氟烷的输送效率(干预前的VER为0.46 (n = 518),干预后的VER为0.57 (n = 531), 95%置信区间为0.092至0.129,P为0.0001),计算平均减少了1.3千克二氧化碳当量的排放量,每例节省约3.50澳元。因此,七氟烷交付的财务和环境成果大大减少。我们的LWTF干预为其他麻醉部门调查和解决与挥发性麻醉剂使用相关的全球环境和财政负担提供了一个有价值的模型。对于使用不便于计算VER的麻醉机的麻醉师,使用我们的LWTF干预组件的方法仍然可以减少与施用挥发性麻醉相关的环境和财务影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery during general anaesthesia by educating and motivating anaesthetists to utilise the Volatile Efficiency Ratio.

Volatile anaesthetic agents such as sevoflurane contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, and selecting low fresh gas flows on anaesthetic machines minimises their waste. Facilitating improvements in sevoflurane use requires the education, motivation, and standardised evaluation of anaesthetists. There is currently no standard of practice related to the efficiency of anaesthetic gas delivery per case. We conducted a multi-component study termed 'Low With The Flow' (LWTF) to directly address these requirements by educating and motivating anaesthetists to reduce fresh gas flow and thereby sevoflurane use. We introduced a novel metric, the 'volatile efficiency ratio' (VER), able to be calculated on Draeger Primus™, the Draeger Atlan™ family and Draeger Perseus A500™ machines, to audit sevoflurane use in a case-by-case fashion, and assess whether the intervention could achieve a set VER target. The LWTF intervention significantly improved the efficiency of sevoflurane delivery (VER 0.46 pre-intervention (n = 518) versus VER 0.57 post-intervention (n = 531), 95% confidence interval 0.092 to 0.129, P < 0.0001) resulting in a calculated average of 1.3 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions reduction and approximately AUD 3.50 saving per case. Consequently, the financial and environmental outcomes from sevoflurane delivery were considerably reduced. Our LWTF intervention provides a valuable model for other anaesthetic departments to investigate and address the global environmental and financial burdens related to their volatile anaesthetic use. For anaesthetists using anaesthesia machines that do not facilitate calculation of VER, an approach using components of our LWTF intervention may still reduce the environmental and financial impacts associated with administration of volatile anaesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信