麻醉护理团队模式中CRNA实践视角的叙述性定性研究。

Q3 Medicine
Cindi Dabney, Michael Carter, Michael Herr, Todd Monroe, James Moore, Nina Sublette
{"title":"麻醉护理团队模式中CRNA实践视角的叙述性定性研究。","authors":"Cindi Dabney, Michael Carter, Michael Herr, Todd Monroe, James Moore, Nina Sublette","doi":"10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research focused on the perspectives of certified registered nurse anesthetists on practice within the anesthesia care team (ACT) model. This narrative, qualitative study examined participants' perspectives on the strengths, challenges, conflict resolutions, and any other information they provided about working in the ACT model. The participants drew sharp distinctions between the supervision requirement of the ACT and that of collaboration with a team approach. The participants reported that they enjoyed and supported collaboration and found that the team approach led to efficient patient care while having extra hands to help and minds to problem-solve complicated patient scenarios. They did not believe physician supervision over their practice was necessary and proved burdensome. They further reported that they often relied on collaboration, accommodation, or compromise to resolve decision-making conflicts when they practiced within the ACT. However, several reported avoiding or leaving the ACT care model for independent practice. Participants who left ACTs reported that they were much happier with their profession and would never return to the ACT model. The recommendations from this study include discontinuing supervision of their practice while strengthening collaboration, a change in payment structure for anesthesia services, and reformed hospital credentialing. They believe that these recommendations would facilitate the full scope of practice and work independently to deliver the high-quality anesthesia care they trained for.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"93 1","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Narrative, Qualitative Research Study of CRNA Perspectives of Practice Within the Anesthesia Care Team Model.\",\"authors\":\"Cindi Dabney, Michael Carter, Michael Herr, Todd Monroe, James Moore, Nina Sublette\",\"doi\":\"10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This research focused on the perspectives of certified registered nurse anesthetists on practice within the anesthesia care team (ACT) model. This narrative, qualitative study examined participants' perspectives on the strengths, challenges, conflict resolutions, and any other information they provided about working in the ACT model. The participants drew sharp distinctions between the supervision requirement of the ACT and that of collaboration with a team approach. The participants reported that they enjoyed and supported collaboration and found that the team approach led to efficient patient care while having extra hands to help and minds to problem-solve complicated patient scenarios. They did not believe physician supervision over their practice was necessary and proved burdensome. They further reported that they often relied on collaboration, accommodation, or compromise to resolve decision-making conflicts when they practiced within the ACT. However, several reported avoiding or leaving the ACT care model for independent practice. Participants who left ACTs reported that they were much happier with their profession and would never return to the ACT model. The recommendations from this study include discontinuing supervision of their practice while strengthening collaboration, a change in payment structure for anesthesia services, and reformed hospital credentialing. They believe that these recommendations would facilitate the full scope of practice and work independently to deliver the high-quality anesthesia care they trained for.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AANA journal\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"45-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AANA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是在麻醉护理团队(ACT)模式下,注册麻醉师护士执业的观点。这个叙述性的定性研究考察了参与者对在ACT模式中工作的优势、挑战、冲突解决方案以及他们提供的任何其他信息的看法。与会者对ACT的监督要求和团队合作的要求做出了鲜明的区分。参与者报告说,他们喜欢并支持合作,发现团队合作的方式带来了高效的病人护理,同时有额外的人手来帮助和思考解决复杂的病人情况。他们不相信医生对他们的实践监督是必要的,事实证明这是一种负担。他们进一步报告说,当他们在ACT考试中练习时,他们经常依靠合作、迁就或妥协来解决决策冲突。然而,一些报告避免或离开ACT护理模式独立实践。离开ACT的参与者报告说,他们对自己的职业更满意,并且永远不会回到ACT模式。这项研究的建议包括在加强合作的同时停止对他们的实践的监督,改变麻醉服务的支付结构,改革医院的资质。他们相信,这些建议将促进全面的实践和独立工作,以提供高质量的麻醉护理,他们的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Narrative, Qualitative Research Study of CRNA Perspectives of Practice Within the Anesthesia Care Team Model.

This research focused on the perspectives of certified registered nurse anesthetists on practice within the anesthesia care team (ACT) model. This narrative, qualitative study examined participants' perspectives on the strengths, challenges, conflict resolutions, and any other information they provided about working in the ACT model. The participants drew sharp distinctions between the supervision requirement of the ACT and that of collaboration with a team approach. The participants reported that they enjoyed and supported collaboration and found that the team approach led to efficient patient care while having extra hands to help and minds to problem-solve complicated patient scenarios. They did not believe physician supervision over their practice was necessary and proved burdensome. They further reported that they often relied on collaboration, accommodation, or compromise to resolve decision-making conflicts when they practiced within the ACT. However, several reported avoiding or leaving the ACT care model for independent practice. Participants who left ACTs reported that they were much happier with their profession and would never return to the ACT model. The recommendations from this study include discontinuing supervision of their practice while strengthening collaboration, a change in payment structure for anesthesia services, and reformed hospital credentialing. They believe that these recommendations would facilitate the full scope of practice and work independently to deliver the high-quality anesthesia care they trained for.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信