{"title":"低电负性诱导包衣抗原对草药茶中有害非那西丁的高特异性免疫测定","authors":"Maner Chen, Wei Lai, Jianhao Lin, Zhiwei Liu, Yi Lei, Yu Wang, Chenglong Wang, Xiaoqin Yu, Qiuhua Mo, Bingzhi Wang, Hongtao Lei, Tian Guan","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <p>Phenacetin is often illegally adulterated into herbal teas for enhanced analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, posing great threats to consumers’ health. However, few rapid tests are available to monitor the banned phenacetin. Though one phenacetin immunoassay has been reported already, its unmet selectivity limits the wider application in rapid screening. Herein, a highly specific and sensitive phenacetin antibody was induced by long spacer arms-based immunogens coupling with low-electronegativity coating antigen. Furthermore, a precise indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ic-ELISA) and a field practical colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (AuNPs-LFIA) were developed for phenacetin detection in Guangdong herbal teas. This work exhibits low detection limits (8.80 ng/mL for ic-ELISA, 2.19 ng/mL for AuNPs-LFIA) and reasonable recoveries (102.8%–111.1% and 91.68%–111.91%). It is noteworthy that both of the developed ic-ELISA and AuNPs-LFIA have high accuracy and practicability in blind herbal tea analysis, which was validated by the authorized liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method. The proposed ic-ELISA and AuNPs-LFIA could be promising approaches in monitoring Guangdong herbal teas with potential illegally adulterated phenacetin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Application</h3>\n \n <p>Rapid and accurate monitoring of illicitly added drugs of phenacetin in herbal teas is necessary and important for consumers and regulatory agencies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Highly specific immunoassays for hazardous phenacetin in herbal teas enabled by low electronegativity-induced coating antigen\",\"authors\":\"Maner Chen, Wei Lai, Jianhao Lin, Zhiwei Liu, Yi Lei, Yu Wang, Chenglong Wang, Xiaoqin Yu, Qiuhua Mo, Bingzhi Wang, Hongtao Lei, Tian Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n \\n <p>Phenacetin is often illegally adulterated into herbal teas for enhanced analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, posing great threats to consumers’ health. However, few rapid tests are available to monitor the banned phenacetin. Though one phenacetin immunoassay has been reported already, its unmet selectivity limits the wider application in rapid screening. Herein, a highly specific and sensitive phenacetin antibody was induced by long spacer arms-based immunogens coupling with low-electronegativity coating antigen. Furthermore, a precise indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ic-ELISA) and a field practical colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (AuNPs-LFIA) were developed for phenacetin detection in Guangdong herbal teas. This work exhibits low detection limits (8.80 ng/mL for ic-ELISA, 2.19 ng/mL for AuNPs-LFIA) and reasonable recoveries (102.8%–111.1% and 91.68%–111.91%). It is noteworthy that both of the developed ic-ELISA and AuNPs-LFIA have high accuracy and practicability in blind herbal tea analysis, which was validated by the authorized liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method. The proposed ic-ELISA and AuNPs-LFIA could be promising approaches in monitoring Guangdong herbal teas with potential illegally adulterated phenacetin.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Practical Application</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rapid and accurate monitoring of illicitly added drugs of phenacetin in herbal teas is necessary and important for consumers and regulatory agencies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Highly specific immunoassays for hazardous phenacetin in herbal teas enabled by low electronegativity-induced coating antigen
Phenacetin is often illegally adulterated into herbal teas for enhanced analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, posing great threats to consumers’ health. However, few rapid tests are available to monitor the banned phenacetin. Though one phenacetin immunoassay has been reported already, its unmet selectivity limits the wider application in rapid screening. Herein, a highly specific and sensitive phenacetin antibody was induced by long spacer arms-based immunogens coupling with low-electronegativity coating antigen. Furthermore, a precise indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ic-ELISA) and a field practical colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (AuNPs-LFIA) were developed for phenacetin detection in Guangdong herbal teas. This work exhibits low detection limits (8.80 ng/mL for ic-ELISA, 2.19 ng/mL for AuNPs-LFIA) and reasonable recoveries (102.8%–111.1% and 91.68%–111.91%). It is noteworthy that both of the developed ic-ELISA and AuNPs-LFIA have high accuracy and practicability in blind herbal tea analysis, which was validated by the authorized liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method. The proposed ic-ELISA and AuNPs-LFIA could be promising approaches in monitoring Guangdong herbal teas with potential illegally adulterated phenacetin.
Practical Application
Rapid and accurate monitoring of illicitly added drugs of phenacetin in herbal teas is necessary and important for consumers and regulatory agencies.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.