从护理角度评估电子健康记录实施成功的工作流程工具的开发和验证:一项探索性和描述性研究。

Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.36401/JQSH-24-16
Mohammad J Jaber, Ahmad M Al-Bashaireh, Osama Kouri, Mohannad A Aldiqs, Ola M Alqudah, Omar M Khraisat, Alanoud A Bindahmsh, Abeer M Alshodukhi, Amer O Almutairi, Nevin A Hakeem
{"title":"从护理角度评估电子健康记录实施成功的工作流程工具的开发和验证:一项探索性和描述性研究。","authors":"Mohammad J Jaber, Ahmad M Al-Bashaireh, Osama Kouri, Mohannad A Aldiqs, Ola M Alqudah, Omar M Khraisat, Alanoud A Bindahmsh, Abeer M Alshodukhi, Amer O Almutairi, Nevin A Hakeem","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-24-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electronic medical records (EMR) have been recognized as practical tools for the improvement of the quality and safety of healthcare despite their occasional use in hospitals worldwide. Epic is an integrated software suite with functionality ranging from patient administration through systems for healthcare providers to billing systems, integration to the primary health sector, and a facility for granting patients access to their data. The implementation process is complicated; creating effective methods requires understanding users' attitudes about these information technologies. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire that measures the efficacy of using workflow during the EMR (Epic) implementation. Furthermore, it describes the nurses' views on the use of quality and satisfaction of workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a literature review, an initial pool of 57 items was generated based on the following three primary constructs: use, quality, and user satisfaction with the tool's workflow. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha and correlation coefficients for construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final scale comprised 53 items corresponding to the following five distinct factors: use of workflow, information quality, service quality, use of EMR, and user satisfaction and the influence of workflow on clinical care. The full scale was assessed, and Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 was found. The construct validity was assessed using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (0.976). Construct validity was tested twice using Exploratory Factor Analysis-Principal Component Analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of workflow, quality of information, quality of service, use of EMR, and user satisfaction scale have good reliability and validity and can be used to implement technology in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"8 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Workflow Instrument to Evaluate the Success of Electronic Health Records Implementation from a Nursing Perspective: An Exploratory and Descriptive Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad J Jaber, Ahmad M Al-Bashaireh, Osama Kouri, Mohannad A Aldiqs, Ola M Alqudah, Omar M Khraisat, Alanoud A Bindahmsh, Abeer M Alshodukhi, Amer O Almutairi, Nevin A Hakeem\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/JQSH-24-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electronic medical records (EMR) have been recognized as practical tools for the improvement of the quality and safety of healthcare despite their occasional use in hospitals worldwide. Epic is an integrated software suite with functionality ranging from patient administration through systems for healthcare providers to billing systems, integration to the primary health sector, and a facility for granting patients access to their data. The implementation process is complicated; creating effective methods requires understanding users' attitudes about these information technologies. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire that measures the efficacy of using workflow during the EMR (Epic) implementation. Furthermore, it describes the nurses' views on the use of quality and satisfaction of workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a literature review, an initial pool of 57 items was generated based on the following three primary constructs: use, quality, and user satisfaction with the tool's workflow. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha and correlation coefficients for construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final scale comprised 53 items corresponding to the following five distinct factors: use of workflow, information quality, service quality, use of EMR, and user satisfaction and the influence of workflow on clinical care. The full scale was assessed, and Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 was found. The construct validity was assessed using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (0.976). Construct validity was tested twice using Exploratory Factor Analysis-Principal Component Analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of workflow, quality of information, quality of service, use of EMR, and user satisfaction scale have good reliability and validity and can be used to implement technology in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"15-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808855/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-24-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-24-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子医疗记录(EMR)已被公认为提高医疗质量和安全的实用工具,尽管它们偶尔在世界各地的医院使用。Epic是一个集成的软件套件,其功能范围从患者管理到医疗保健提供商系统到计费系统,集成到初级卫生部门,以及授予患者访问其数据的设施。实施过程很复杂;创建有效的方法需要了解用户对这些信息技术的态度。本研究旨在开发和验证一份问卷,以衡量在EMR (Epic)实施期间使用工作流的有效性。此外,还描述了护士对工作流程使用质量和满意度的看法。方法:在文献回顾之后,根据以下三个主要结构:使用、质量和对工具工作流程的用户满意度,生成了一个包含57个项目的初始池。内部一致性信度通过计算Cronbach's alpha和结构效度相关系数来评估。结果:最终量表包含53个条目,分别对应以下五个不同的因素:工作流程的使用、信息质量、服务质量、电子病历的使用、用户满意度以及工作流程对临床护理的影响。全量表评估,Cronbach's alpha为0.95。采用Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin抽样充分性检验和Bartlett球性检验(0.976)评估结构效度。采用探索性因子分析-主成分分析对结构效度进行两次检验。结论:工作流程的使用、信息质量、服务质量、电子病历的使用和用户满意度量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于医疗卫生技术的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of a Workflow Instrument to Evaluate the Success of Electronic Health Records Implementation from a Nursing Perspective: An Exploratory and Descriptive Study.

Introduction: Electronic medical records (EMR) have been recognized as practical tools for the improvement of the quality and safety of healthcare despite their occasional use in hospitals worldwide. Epic is an integrated software suite with functionality ranging from patient administration through systems for healthcare providers to billing systems, integration to the primary health sector, and a facility for granting patients access to their data. The implementation process is complicated; creating effective methods requires understanding users' attitudes about these information technologies. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire that measures the efficacy of using workflow during the EMR (Epic) implementation. Furthermore, it describes the nurses' views on the use of quality and satisfaction of workflow.

Methods: Following a literature review, an initial pool of 57 items was generated based on the following three primary constructs: use, quality, and user satisfaction with the tool's workflow. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha and correlation coefficients for construct validity.

Results: The final scale comprised 53 items corresponding to the following five distinct factors: use of workflow, information quality, service quality, use of EMR, and user satisfaction and the influence of workflow on clinical care. The full scale was assessed, and Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 was found. The construct validity was assessed using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (0.976). Construct validity was tested twice using Exploratory Factor Analysis-Principal Component Analysis.

Conclusion: The use of workflow, quality of information, quality of service, use of EMR, and user satisfaction scale have good reliability and validity and can be used to implement technology in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信